Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,925 of 12,750    |
|    Louis Boyd to Laurie    |
|    Re: 10X    |
|    09 Aug 11 08:34:53    |
      From: boyd@apt0.sao.arizona.edu              Laurie wrote:       > Optical devices generally have their magnification specified as nX;       > e.g. 10X, meaning that the magnification produces an image that is ten       > times larger than the original.       > Yet, when one looks through a "10X" binocular with one eye and       > without with the other eye, and then overlaps the two images, one sees       > about a 2-3 times larger image.       > Why?       > Laurie              Maybe the manufacturer thinks they should specify the magnification in       terms of area or volume rather than linear dimension. 10x apparent       area would require 3.16X increase in linear dimensions. Likewise for       a 10x appearance in object volume of an object with the same proportions       the linear magnification should only be 2.15X              What does an object which appears to be "10 times larger" mean to you?              Are those binoculars perhaps made in China? I've seen cheap Chinese       fixed magnification riflescope with "mil-dot" reticles where the reticle       spacings aren't anywhere close to being 1 milliradian spacing. I'm not       sure if it's matter of lying, stupidity, or they simply don't care as       long as it sells.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca