home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.optics      Discussion relating to the science of op      12,750 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 11,066 of 12,750   
   glen herrmannsfeldt to Peter Webb   
   Re: IR goggles   
   10 Feb 12 05:39:10   
   
   XPost: sci.physics, sci.physics.electromag   
   From: gah@ugcs.caltech.edu   
      
   In sci.physics.electromag Peter Webb  wrote:   
      
   (snip on IR night viewers)   
   >> They also do amplification, so, no, they can't be passive.   
      
   > Sure they can. You just need a lens or a mirror larger than the human pupil   
   > at the front end, and you will get gain. If you don't believe me, try   
   > looking at the moon through a large astronomical telescope at low   
   > magnification. Unfortunately you generally also get magnification, which   
   > depending on the application may be a bad thing. But passive devices can   
   > definitely amplify the light that you see.   
      
   But IR is lower frequency than visible light, so you can't use   
   something like fluorescence to do the conversion. There is a conversion   
   system with very low efficiency, but even that needs a power source.   
   (It is used for testing IR lasers, and other high power IR sources.)   
      
   The passive way to do up-conversion is with a frequency tripler,   
   but that has even lower efficiency. It works for a laser source,   
   not a reflection laser illuminated, and not from natural IR   
   sources.   
      
   -- glen   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca