Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,101 of 12,750    |
|    robert bristow-johnson to Jerry Avins    |
|    Re: Is Match Filtering Ever Used To Reco    |
|    10 Apr 12 00:30:46    |
      XPost: sci.math.num-analysis, sci.math, comp.dsp       From: rbj@audioimagination.com              On 4/9/12 11:49 PM, Jerry Avins wrote:       > On 4/7/2012 12:25 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:       >> Is it common to use matched filtering to recover the original signal       >> in optics?       >       > Matched filtering is used to _recover_ a signal only by those who don't       > understand it. It is used to _determine_the_presence_or_absence of a       > particular signal -- the one that matches the filter -- in a degraded       > channel.              oooh, careful with the troll, Jerry. i told him that last week and he       wasn't particularly appreciative.              troll: "determining the presence or absence of a particular signal" is       what we mean by "detection". and that wikipedia example was one of       detection *not* recovery (but it's a lousy article anyway).              --              r b-j rbj@audioimagination.com              "Imagination is more important than knowledge."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca