XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics.particle   
   From: jeroen@nospam.please   
      
   On 2012-06-05 00:26, Poutnik wrote:   
   > In article posted Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:32:53 -0700 (PDT)   
   >   Katsumoto Sakuraba says..   
   >>   
   >> On Jun 3, 3:53 pm, Poutnik  wrote:   
   >>> In article posted Sun, 3 Jun 2012 06:43:05 -0700 (PDT)   
   >>>   Katsumoto Sakuraba says..   
   >>>   
   >>>>> By far the best place to start is:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>          Feynman, _QED_. This is a non-mathematical introduction to the   
   >>>>>          basic concepts of QED.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Tom Roberts   
   >>>   
   >>>> why, the mathematical one makes no sense?   
   >>>   
   >>> Is guessing why so hard ?   
   >>>   
   >>> --   
   >>> Poutnik   
   >>   
   >> this means exactly what?   
   >>   
   >> QED has no mathematical beauty as well   
   >>   
   >> good bye   
   >   
   > Unfortunately, it works...   
   >   
      
   So did epicycles.   
      
   Jeroen Belleman   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)