Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,167 of 12,750    |
|    boxman to Phil Hobbs    |
|    Re: 75mm beamsplitter cube    |
|    31 Jul 12 10:59:40    |
      From: boxman@voyager.net              On 7/30/2012 9:35 PM, Phil Hobbs wrote:       > boxman wrote:       >>       >> On 7/30/2012 11:11 AM, Michael Koch wrote:       >>> Hi,       >>>       >>> does anybody know a source for big 75mm beamsplitter cubes, broadband       400-700nm non-polarizing?       >>>       >>> Thanks,       >>> Michael       >>>       >>       >> I needed a 75 mm beamsplitter like this a few years ago and could not       >> find a supplier that stocked them. I ended up buying the cheapest 75 mm       >> right angle prisms that met my optical specifications that I could find       >> and then working with a custom optical shop to have them coated and       >> assembled into a cube (I used PFG Precision optics for the coating and       >> assembly).       >       > 75 mm is a monster beam splitter. Getting light through that much glass       > without serious waveform distortion can be a problem. Do you really       > need it to be a cube?       >       > Cheers       >       > Phil Hobbs       >       If a cube is used in a projection imaging system (which is what I was       using it for) then the cube works better than the plate because the       plate introduces a path difference in the combined beams for the       projection lens which can degrade the projected image worse than the cube.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca