Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,215 of 12,750    |
|    rll_sb to All    |
|    Re: accurate measurement of focal length    |
|    25 Oct 12 16:05:51    |
      From: rlombardo3@gmail.com              In engineering, the exact focal length and position are not required as one       simply adjusts the axial position of the lens relative to the focal plane to       obtain the smallest spot (circle of least confusion). Exact focal length is       not needed, nor measured typically.              As you are interested in monochromatic light focusing, the problem is less       challenging, but manufacturing tolerances must also be considered in       attempting to determine the exact value. Zemax optical design software can       be used to input tolerances and Monte Carlo simulations be run to estimate       the range of focal variations.              As you are also no-doubt aware, the focal lengths given include the back,       front, and effective. All rather nebulous in any attempted measurement.              Can you describe why you need to know the focal length so accurately. For       theoretical studies, you can simply use the provided focal length and for       empirical work, you can measure the focal length by iteratively measuring       the focused spot and moving the lens until the smallest focused spot is       obtained. Most automated MTF stations have this ability, typically in the       visible or far-IR band only. Using a blackbody source with a       narrow-bandwidth filter at 1553 nm along with a detector sensitive in that       band would provide an accurate measurement. The MTF stations I've used use       a calibrated stage that reads in 0.001", which is accurate to a higher level       than you need. There are companies that can provide this service, but at a       non-standard wavelength cost might be prohibitive.              I suggest having the focal length measured at nominal wavelength that       transmits 1553 nm light and then correct the focal length from visible (for       example) to your wavelength using refractive indices of the lens materials       to obtain the adjusted focal length.              Please contact me directly at ltec@cox.net if you need more specifics.              Ciao,              - Russ in Santa Barbara                     "laser" wrote in message       news:74359794-c7a7-422c-9c96-2bb548b4aac1@googlegroups.com...              http://search.newport.com/?q=KPX115AR.18              To whom it may concern,       I am trying to get focal length of this lens at 1553nm. In specifications,       tolerance of the focal length of this lens is +/-1% and it is not enough for       my application. I would like to get the focal length of this lens within       <+/-0.1-0.2% error.              Would you please let me know what is a best way to know the answer?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca