home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.optics      Discussion relating to the science of op      12,750 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 11,340 of 12,750   
   Narasimham Gudipaty to J-C   
   Re: aplanatic cardoide refraction   
   22 May 13 16:14:08   
   
   From: mathma18@gmail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:42:42 AM UTC+5:30, J-C wrote:   
   > "Narasimham Gudipaty"  wrote in message   
   >    
   > news:.... @a15g2000pbu.googlegroups.com...   
   >    
   > On May 21, 2:17 am, "J-C"  wrote:   
   >    
   > >  wrote in message   
   >    
   > ----   
   >    
   > > As to Descartes ovals they are pretty useless in practice for a number of   
   >    
   > > reasons, while they may be stigmatic they do not fulfill the sine   
   >    
   > > condition   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > > for example, therefore they can't be used for imaging extended objects.   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > Thanks.(Working in India I have only a limited or ready access to such   
   >    
   > good old book sources. Apart from internet, trying to  derive it   
   >    
   > afresh).   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > But under what situations is Snell's law not valid ? Why cartesian   
   >    
   > ovals, with optical length invariance considered,do not obey the law?   
   >    
   > What situation makes it to re-conform ? ( I mean, when did the law   
   >    
   > become illegal :) ?).   
       
   > Narasimham   
      
   > ===============================================   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > The references I gave you are entirely free and I am sure that you can   
   >    
   > download them in India as in most elsewhere.   
       
   > There are many more such "Google Books" texts in optics which are   
   >    
   > available for free at various levels and even if old they provide a good   
   >    
   > start at least for elementary (and in fact not so elementary) start in   
   >    
   > optics, geometrical and physical.   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > You don't have to re-invent, re-discover or re-derive anything.   
       
   >    
   > And Google Books is only one of many such internet resources,   
   >    
   > many quite recent and up to date.   
       
   > Please choose two or three books and start to study them earnestly.   
       
   > We are very fortunate to have the internet at our disposal, Srinivasa   
   >    
   > Ramanujan had very few books but he did study whatever he had very   
   >    
   > hard.   
   >    
       
   > I am sorry but since I do not understand your question I am unable   
   >    
   > to give you an answer, now or later.   
      
   Thanks a lot for guidance and encouragement. Sorry for insufficent expression.   
   My aim was to see how to design a transmitter/receicer optical combo, source   
   inside denser medium between two foci, modifying Snell's law to suit   
   differetial equation    
   formulation.   
      
   http://i44.tinypic.com/2wgtymx.jpg   
   http://i40.tinypic.com/cuqzq.png   
      
   I have come this far, Snell's law not being obeyed was in fact a matter of   
   concern, but now ok.Optical path length tallies. Pl comment.   
      
   Regards   
   Narasimham   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca