Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,369 of 12,750    |
|    Phil Hobbs to All    |
|    Nonpolarizing beamsplitter mystery    |
|    21 Jul 13 12:09:38    |
      From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net              A client of mine is having a very strange problem with what Newport       laughingly describes as a nonpolarizing beamsplitter cube.              Their Michelson interferometer works with one lens in each arm, works       with no lenses, but does not work with only one lens. The fringes just       go away.              The lens is used as a cat's eye reflector, i.e. it has a mirror at       focus, and no amount of tweaking will get the fringes back.              Ah, I hear you say, it's spatial incoherence--the beam is multimode, so       when you spatially invert it, it won't interfere with itself anymore.       Invert twice, you're back to full interference. And that idea is       supported by an interesting fact: inverting the beam twice in _one_ arm       also works:               P=1/f f 2f P=1/f 2f       beam () x () x|mirror              Pretty diagnostic of a spatial coherence problem, right?              Thing is, the input beam comes from a single-mode fibre plus collimator,       so it isn't spatially multimode at all.              The laser is actually a SLD used for coherence tomography, so the       fringes have about a 10-um range of visibility about zero path       difference, so it must be some temporal or polarization problem.              Everything I've thought of winds up being too small an effect. Path       differences are quadratic in angle, so they're too small, and everything       else seems to be small-squared as well.              The one exception is the beamsplitter hypotenuse, because there the beam       is at 45 degrees' incidence, so weirdness can enter in the first order.        But what weirdness?              They're 3000 miles away, so I can't just dive in and poke around with       the thing, and I never use NPBSes for anything, so I don't have any in       the drawer.              Before I buy one and measure it, do any of you folks have any good       ideas, especially any based on relevant experience?              Thanks              Phil "Call me Puzzled" Hobbs                     --       Dr Philip C D Hobbs       Principal Consultant       ElectroOptical Innovations LLC       Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics              160 North State Road #203       Briarcliff Manor NY 10510              hobbs at electrooptical dot net       http://electrooptical.net              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca