Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,395 of 12,750    |
|    wadexkelman@provide.net to James Klein    |
|    Re: Speed of light and time quantization    |
|    18 Aug 13 08:20:15    |
      On Thursday, August 15, 2013 1:42:58 AM UTC-4, James Klein wrote:       > Hi,       >        > "It always botherd me that everything seems quantized except time."                      Hi, Jim.        The product of time and energy is quantized, as is the product of distance       and momentum.              > "...or could this not explain        > the limit for the speed of light in a vac."        >               It seems we live in a Universe that has a maximum speed limit and a minimum       resolution. This is exactly how one would arrange a system that is optimized       for calculations. Are we living in a simulation? If so, how would you tell?       Many of the "laws" of nature are emergent; that is, they cannot be predicted       from first principles. An example is the rigidity of a steel beam, which is       not a property of the iron atoms themselves, but only a property of the       collection of atoms. Which        first principle predicts the rigidity of materials? Where does this property       come from?       We create simulations of the Universe inside our machines, and presumably, if       we created a sufficiently complex simulation, it could create a simulation of       its own. So, how far are we from the bottom? It may be turtles all the way       down to a minimum        calculation for us, but is that true all the way up?              -Wade              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca