Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,487 of 12,750    |
|    Phil Hobbs to laloum.eric@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Nyquist spatial sampling and pixeliz    |
|    08 Nov 13 16:12:23    |
      From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net              On 11/08/2013 03:57 PM, laloum.eric@gmail.com wrote:       > Dear All,       >       > Is it possible that an image is correctly sampled according to Nyquist (2 to       3 pixel per resolution element) but nevertheless show some pixelization effect       when sufficiently zoomed ?       > I guess both issues (Digital sampling and pixellisation) are highly       related...and it's quite easy to conceive that correct Nyquist sampling is a       necessary condition for avoiding pixelization, but is it also a sufficient       condition ?       >       > I would say no but can't explain why ;-(       >       > Thanks,       >       > Eric       >              Visible pixellation is caused by crude zoom algorithms that just       replicate pixels.              Cheers              Phil Hobbs              --       Dr Philip C D Hobbs       Principal Consultant       ElectroOptical Innovations LLC       Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics              160 North State Road #203       Briarcliff Manor NY 10510              hobbs at electrooptical dot net       http://electrooptical.net              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca