Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,498 of 12,750    |
|    laloum.eric@gmail.com to All    |
|    Re: Nyquist spatial sampling and pixeliz    |
|    22 Nov 13 13:35:30    |
      Hi all,              Sorry for my late feedback on this topic...       Thanks for all your details explanation.       If I understand correctly, Nyquist sampling is not sufficient but with enough       oversampling, then the border between pixels will get less and less       discernable. Intuitively, I presume that if pixel size is so small that it       only represent one percent of        Airy radius (point spread function), then the contrast between two adjacent       pixel will be so small that it will be either immerged in the noise or not       properly discriminated by the ADC step.                      Best regards,              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca