Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,514 of 12,750    |
|    --- -.dotat to laloum.eric@gmail.com    |
|    Re: detectors for near UV    |
|    09 Dec 13 22:54:43    |
      From: hwabnig@.-              On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:31:07 -0800 (PST), laloum.eric@gmail.com wrote:              >Thank you,       >       > I'll have a look on this UV100 device...       >       >Phil, your remark on the detector surface is indeed really the critical issue       for my project.       >The fluorescence emitter is somehow "enclosed" in a "box" which surface is       covered by mirrors that should direct the light onto the detector surface. In       virtue of the Etendue conservation principle, I presume that I need either a       very large area        detector with small acceptance angle or a small area detector but with very       large acceptance angle. I've contacted APD and SiPM vendors in order to get       this "collection angle" information but they apparently do not test it !       >       >I was wondering if using non-imaging optical elements like tapered fiber       bundle, I could "concentrate" more efficiently the fluorescence emission into       my detector.       >Such taper bundle are used in Streak camera for instance in order to couple       the 25mm phosphor to 18 mm CCD readout.       >       >Best regards,       >       > Eric       What colour is the fluorescence?       Optical fibers introduce thier own fluorescence if exposed to UV.              w.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca