Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,540 of 12,750    |
|    haiticare2011@gmail.com to All    |
|    Cutting interference filters?    |
|    13 Jan 14 09:02:06    |
      As a thought experiment, consider that an average Si PD detector is somewhere       around 2mmx2mm, as I remember. So the question arises in my mind, has anyone       cut the rather expensive filters into sizes needed for the detectors? I looked       around, and Tungsten        carbide scribe goes for $8 (seems to work better than the diamond variety.)        This could be done by hand, but a "scribing engine" worth consideration. I'm       still thinking about it, but ideal is to have tensioner spring, guide for       sliding, and way to immobilize the filter.        What is needed for immobilization is a glue to temporarily fix the filter. The       dopping wax used by diamond polishers, the old standby Duco cement, or Sodium       Silicate, a water soluble glue. You probably dont want to melt wax, or expose       filter to water, so        that leaves Duco released with acetone. I'm even nervous with acetone, since       it has a hydrophilic double nature capable of penetrating inorganic films. I'd       feel better with a strictly hydrophobic solvent like toluene, methylene       chloride, or hexane.        Possibly someone will post that the filter manufacturers like OCLI are doing       this already, but given that detectors are generally small area, it's a bit       surprising to me that the filters are so large.        JB              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca