Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,559 of 12,750    |
|    haiticare2011@gmail.com to gghe...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Cutting interference filters?    |
|    15 Jan 14 07:49:26    |
      On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 7:43:40 PM UTC-5, gghe...@gmail.com wrote:       > On Monday, January 13, 2014 12:02:06 PM UTC-5, haitic...@gmail.com wrote:       >        > > As a thought experiment, consider that an average Si PD detector is       somewhere around 2mmx2mm, as I remember. So the question arises in my mind,       has anyone cut the rather expensive filters into sizes needed for the       detectors? I looked around, and        Tungsten carbide scribe goes for $8 (seems to work better than the diamond       variety.)        >        > >        >        > > This could be done by hand, but a "scribing engine" worth consideration.       I'm still thinking about it, but ideal is to have tensioner spring, guide for       sliding, and way to immobilize the filter.        >        > >        >        > > What is needed for immobilization is a glue to temporarily fix the filter.       The dopping wax used by diamond polishers, the old standby Duco cement, or       Sodium Silicate, a water soluble glue. You probably dont want to melt wax, or       expose filter to water,        so that leaves Duco released with acetone. I'm even nervous with acetone,       since it has a hydrophilic double nature capable of penetrating inorganic       films. I'd feel better with a strictly hydrophobic solvent like toluene,       methylene chloride, or hexane.        >        > >        >        > > Possibly someone will post that the filter manufacturers like OCLI are       doing this already, but given that detectors are generally small area, it's a       bit surprising to me that the filters are so large.        >        > >        >        > > JB       >        >        >        > I think this is a bad idea, Interference filters (IF) typically have       internal layers that don't like water, and hence a coating around the       perimeter.        >        > So it depends on the IF, only my supplier knows for sure.        >        >        >        > George H.              I used to make these professionally, if that matters. There are several       designs - many layer dielectrics and metal layers with a gap between. These       were made by magnetron sputtering, which produces a fairly hard coating,       depending on the material. They        are generally up to being cut. You understand, this is for prototype work, and       production would be different. Materials vary, but high index is often TiO2       and low can be MgF2. These are robust materials, as evidenced by some camera       filters directly        exposed to the ambient. In production, you might set the computer program       boundary conditions to index of refraction 1.33 to embed in Silicone. These       multilayer dielectrics are designed in computer programs, and the thicknesses       monitored by quartz        crystal oscillators inside the vacuum chamber.               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca