home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.optics      Discussion relating to the science of op      12,750 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 11,566 of 12,750   
   haiticare2011@gmail.com to gghe...@gmail.com   
   Re: Cutting interference filters?   
   18 Jan 14 02:50:00   
   
   On Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:43:54 AM UTC-5, gghe...@gmail.com wrote:   
   > On Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:19:18 AM UTC-5, haitic...@gmail.com wrote:   
   >    
   > > On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:57:24 PM UTC-5, gghe...@gmail.com wrote:   
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > > Hi George,   
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > > My mispent youth - doing TF work. Thanks for your understanding. I am just   
   doing quantitative work, covering a Si Photodiode with a filter that may not   
   preserve an image, just most of the light. So the BP34 (which Phil Hobbs   
   kindly told me about), is    
   about 2.5 mm square, as I recall.    
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > > The bandpass filters in Edmunds optics cost over $100 for the 12-25 mm dia   
   sizes. But these filters are for the "satin underwear" crowd who don't mind   
   paying high prices for filters that maintain coherence over every square mm of   
   their aperture, a    
   luxury unnecessary in quantitative measurements.   
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > > The thickness of the bandpass designs I don't know - I'm going to make a   
   wild guess - It's 10 layers X 400 angstroms (40 nm). So that's a thickness of   
   .4 micron, if my math OK. Probably low by 2-3X.   
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > > The whole thing is a thought experiment, at least to me, to just see what   
   is the minimum required for quantitative measurements in narrow bandwidth   
   filters. Depositing directly onto a Si surface another way to go.   
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > > JB   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > No problem,  I don't even bother looking at optics from Edmunds anymore.     
   >    
   > (too expensive) Thor labs has 12mm IF's for ~$50.   
   >    
   > We buy some unmounted ones from optometrics for ~$28.  (but that price is   
   from an old PO so...)   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > George H.   
      
   Thank you George. I'll look into them. Edmunds IS pricey - I note their BaSO4   
   paint >200$. I'm betting its got a minimal binder.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca