On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 7:57:33 PM UTC-5, gghe...@gmail.com wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 11:00:46 AM UTC-5, haitic...@gmail.com wrote:   
   >    
   > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:29:25 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > > Thanks for listening   
   >    
   > >    
   >    
   > > JB   
   >    
   > Dude, let me just say we all* pretty much know how synchronous detection   
   works,   
   >    
   > and other noise reduction techniques, implementing them in the 'right way'   
   is the fun part that we like to talk about.  Please join us.  (We've all* read   
   AoE several times.)    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > George H.   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > *all is obviously an exageration, but take it to mean many.   
      
   George   
   I'm glad you showed up. I'm trying to settle an issue in synchronous   
   detection. I have a water sample I am measuring ppm pollution of a species in.   
   I can synchro detect the transmission - that's not a problem. But the signal   
   is way down in the noise.    
   Exactly how can I get it out?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)