Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,642 of 12,750    |
|    haiticare2011@gmail.com to Michael Balda    |
|    Re: How to generate (pseudo-)random, non    |
|    31 Jan 14 07:09:19    |
      On Friday, January 31, 2014 6:18:23 AM UTC-5, Michael Balda wrote:       > I'd like to use a pattern projector for computer vision tasks. The pattern       can be in the NIR range, should not repeat itself but doesn't need to be       described exactly, so random noise, speckle etc. should be fine. It would be       preferrable, if the pattern        can be restricted to a defined field of view instead of being omni-directional       and was stable over time. Of course there are several different approaches but       I would like to find one which is        >        > (a) cheap,        >        > (b) robust,        >        > (c) efficient (in terms of power consumption),        >        > (d) not too complex,       >        > (e) has good availability of components and        >        > (f) is monochromatic or has small bandwidth.       >        >        >        > Thanks in advance for any suggestions.              well, without knowing more, here is a rather speculative approach:        Put a bright led into a fluid bath in a test tube and point it where you want       to. Put small mica or similar particles in the fluid, so that they stay in       suspension. (Glitter from crafts store possible.) Then, based on the thermal       currents from the led (       or a helper resistor below it.), you will see a "near field" projection of       patterns. If you sand off the plastic enclosure on the led, it will magnify       the effect, but try without first. The trick with this sort of thing is to get       a dense fluid, and        perchloroethylene dry cleaning fluid a good choice. With water, plastic flakes       would be best, since they have low density.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca