From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net   
      
   On 02/06/2014 11:38 AM, haiticare2011@gmail.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Although you claim to be being scientific, you nevertheless seem to   
   >> be   
   >>   
   >> using a private definition of "information", so that we're all   
   >> talking   
   >>   
   >> past each other here.  What exactly do you mean by "information"?   
   >>   
   >>   
   > I never claimed to be scientific, just that the Shannon people   
   > falsely do. Nor do I know what "information" is, but just that they   
   > don't either.   
      
   Well, they seem to be able to prove correct theorems about it, and   
   generate useful, testable, interesting, correct results on that basis.   
   That usually indicates that somebody knows what he's talking about.   
      
    > There is nothing private about my questions, except the   
   > answers.   
      
   Since you deny their definition, and don't supply one of your own,   
   you're therefore talking about nothing whatsoever.  ;)   
      
   Cheers   
      
   Phil Hobbs   
   --   
   Dr Philip C D Hobbs   
   Principal Consultant   
   ElectroOptical Innovations LLC   
   Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics   
      
   160 North State Road #203   
   Briarcliff Manor NY 10510   
      
   hobbs at electrooptical dot net   
   http://electrooptical.net   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)