Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,761 of 12,750    |
|    sgpopticsguru@gmail.com to All    |
|    Camera Calibration    |
|    22 Mar 14 04:35:06    |
      I am trying to characterize a camera sensor and I have a problem that I cannot       explain. I am trying to measure the linearity of pixels (pix value vs. light).              My test set up is fairly simple. For a given exposure duration, I measure the       FPN and dark noise of the camera (close shutter, dark room, take 200 frames,       average out to eliminate temporal noise and what is left FPN and dark noise).       I repeat this test        for various exposure durations.               Later, I provide pretty uniform light (via diffuser and point source) and       measure pixel values over 200 frames. (no lens) I take out the previous FPN       and dark noise average from each of the frame and average out to find out PRNU.              I repeat the test for various exposure durations under the same light and do a       linear regression on pixel values. The linearity of the pixels are very good       but they do not cross from zero, the regression line has a DC offset.               I cannot figure out why? I assumed when I take out the FPN and dark noise       components, the DC offset should have been taken out. I use same gain for all       measurements. If I repeat the experiment with more intense light, I still see       the DC offset on        linearity but it is different, somehow the linearity line for pixels is       shifted up or down with light, which doesn't make sense.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca