Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,765 of 12,750    |
|    Louis Boyd to sgpopticsguru@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Camera Calibration    |
|    23 Mar 14 09:37:34    |
      From: boyd@apt0.sao.arizona.edu              sgpopticsguru@gmail.com wrote:       > On Saturday, March 22, 2014 11:40:21 PM UTC+8, Mikko OH2HVJ wrote:       >>       >>       >>> I repeat the test for various exposure durations under the same       >>> light       >>       >>> and do a linear regression on pixel values. The linearity of the       >>       >>> pixels are very good but they do not cross from zero, the       >>> regression       >>       >>> line has a DC offset.       >>       >>       >>       >> There's a bias voltage in the sensor output signal by both the       >>       >> chip amplifiers and purposefully added so that AD converter       >>       >> does not have to start from zero, where it may be non-linear.       >>       >>       >>       >> This is removed in astronomy by taking 'bias images' in dark with       >>       >> zero exposure time and substracting this from the image.       >>       >>       >>       >> --       >>       >> Mikko OH2HVJ       >       > Mikko, I do this. If you look at my description, I first measure FPN       > and take it out. Despite this I see a DC offset later which makes me       > wonder.       >              What is the magnitude of the effect your seeing? (measured A/D counts       out of full range A/D counts) at the zero crossing? What kind of       sensor and camera? Manufacturer & model of both?              How are you determining that the exposure is uniform over the nominal       exposure time? What is the light source? What method are you using to       start and stop the exposure. Switching the light source on and off? A       mechanical shutter in the camera? Interline transfer on the sensor?              This is just a guess based on limited information, but you may be       measuring the ramp of the opening and closing of the camera's shutter       if it's a Scientific grade camera with a mechanical shutter. That can        be removed in the reduction process.a It can be a simple constant       subtracted from the exposure if the shutter is always allowed to open       fully before closing. It's not an error. It's just a fact that       doubling the time between opening the shutter and closing it allows a       little more than twice the light to pass though as opening it and       closing it twice.              You may also care if the exposure at the center of the sensor is equal       to the exposure off axis. Most scientific cameras put mechanical       shutters right in front of the sensor and have two leaves which open       from the center which gives a longer exposure in the center of the       sensor. That can be more important to precision photometry than       linearity vs exposure time.              What is your specific application?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca