Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,767 of 12,750    |
|    sgpopticsguru@gmail.com to Louis Boyd    |
|    Re: Camera Calibration    |
|    24 Mar 14 08:37:57    |
      On Monday, March 24, 2014 12:37:34 AM UTC+8, Louis Boyd wrote:       > sgpopticsguru@gmail.com wrote:       >        > > On Saturday, March 22, 2014 11:40:21 PM UTC+8, Mikko OH2HVJ wrote:       >        > >>       >        > >>       >        > >>> I repeat the test for various exposure durations under the same       >        > >>> light       >        > >>       >        > >>> and do a linear regression on pixel values. The linearity of the       >        > >>       >        > >>> pixels are very good but they do not cross from zero, the       >        > >>> regression       >        > >>       >        > >>> line has a DC offset.       >        > >>       >        > >>       >        > >>       >        > >> There's a bias voltage in the sensor output signal by both the       >        > >>       >        > >> chip amplifiers and purposefully added so that AD converter       >        > >>       >        > >> does not have to start from zero, where it may be non-linear.       >        > >>       >        > >>       >        > >>       >        > >> This is removed in astronomy by taking 'bias images' in dark with       >        > >>       >        > >> zero exposure time and substracting this from the image.       >        > >>       >        > >>       >        > >>       >        > >> --       >        > >>       >        > >> Mikko OH2HVJ       >        > >       >        > > Mikko, I do this. If you look at my description, I first measure FPN       >        > > and take it out. Despite this I see a DC offset later which makes me       >        > > wonder.       >        > >       >        >        >        > What is the magnitude of the effect your seeing? (measured A/D counts       >        > out of full range A/D counts) at the zero crossing? What kind of        >        > sensor and camera? Manufacturer & model of both?       >        >        >        > How are you determining that the exposure is uniform over the nominal       >        > exposure time? What is the light source? What method are you using to        >        > start and stop the exposure. Switching the light source on and off? A        >        > mechanical shutter in the camera? Interline transfer on the sensor?       >        >        >        > This is just a guess based on limited information, but you may be        >        > measuring the ramp of the opening and closing of the camera's shutter        >        > if it's a Scientific grade camera with a mechanical shutter. That can        >        > be removed in the reduction process.a It can be a simple constant        >        > subtracted from the exposure if the shutter is always allowed to open        >        > fully before closing. It's not an error. It's just a fact that        >        > doubling the time between opening the shutter and closing it allows a        >        > little more than twice the light to pass though as opening it and        >        > closing it twice.       >        >        >        > You may also care if the exposure at the center of the sensor is equal        >        > to the exposure off axis. Most scientific cameras put mechanical        >        > shutters right in front of the sensor and have two leaves which open        >        > from the center which gives a longer exposure in the center of the        >        > sensor. That can be more important to precision photometry than        >        > linearity vs exposure time.       >        >        >        > What is your specific application?              Dear Luis,       Thanks for the detailed answers. The magnitude of the effect is very small but       it is there nonetheless. Camera is a global shutter cmos from Aptina.       (AR0134). Light source is a point LED with diffuser in front. Since camera       shutter is electronic, most of        your theory may not be applicable. I do not have an integrating sphere handy       so I use a point source and change the current on the LED to change overall       light level.               I am essentially calibrate the colors of the camera perfectly, hence my effort       to take out the FPN/Dark Noise/Row Col Noise/PRNU etc. so that I am left with       temporal noise and real light.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca