Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,991 of 12,750    |
|    Phil Hobbs to ggherold@gmail.com    |
|    Re: non-polarizing beam splitters    |
|    07 Jan 15 23:23:11    |
      From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net              On 1/6/2015 8:54 PM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:       > On Monday, December 29, 2014 9:06:55 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:       >> I'll probably have to get a couple to play with. The nonpolarizing thing       and the asymmetry make them potentially harder to use than PBSes for anything       at all fancy--for instance if the phase shift between p and s is more than a       degree or two, the        output polarization will be a mess.       >>       >> Cheers       >>       >> Phil Hobbs       >       > Hi Phil, (and I thought SO was dead.)       > If there is any absorption you get a phase shift.       > (But you know that.)       > We've used the phase shift in metallic beam splitters.              Interesting--what do you use it for? IME it's usually a nuisance.       (You folks have some pretty cool ideas.)              Cheers              Phil Hobbs              --       Dr Philip C D Hobbs       Principal Consultant       ElectroOptical Innovations LLC       Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics              160 North State Road #203       Briarcliff Manor NY 10510              hobbs at electrooptical dot net       http://electrooptical.net              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca