Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,992 of 12,750    |
|    ggherold@gmail.com to Phil Hobbs    |
|    Re: non-polarizing beam splitters    |
|    09 Jan 15 08:28:42    |
      On Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 11:35:02 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:       > On 01/08/2015 11:05 AM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:       > > On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 11:23:10 PM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:       > >> On 1/6/2015 8:54 PM, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:       > >>> On Monday, December 29, 2014 9:06:55 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:       > >>>> I'll probably have to get a couple to play with. The       > >>>> nonpolarizing thing and the asymmetry make them potentially       > >>>> harder to use than PBSes for anything at all fancy--for       > >>>> instance if the phase shift between p and s is more than a       > >>>> degree or two, the output polarization will be a mess.       > >>>>       > >>>> Cheers       > >>>>       > >>>> Phil Hobbs       > >>>       > >>> Hi Phil, (and I thought SO was dead.) If there is any absorption       > >>> you get a phase shift. (But you know that.) We've used the phase       > >>> shift in metallic beam splitters.       > >>       > >> Interesting--what do you use it for? IME it's usually a nuisance.       > >> (You folks have some pretty cool ideas.)       > >>       > >> Cheers       > >>       > >> Phil Hobbs       >       > >       > > This was my colleagues idea... we bought a bunch of inconel (I       > > think) metallic beam splitters from thor labs, and found the one that       > > gives ~90 degree phase shift. This was stuck into a Michelson       > > interferometer and then one looks at both the output beams. (You       > > need a second beam splitter to pick off the beam that goes back to       > > the light source.) Then with two signals in quadrature you can get       > > direction information as you move one of the mirrors. Pretty neat.       > > You also get much better noise immunity when counting fringes... it's       > > almost all phase noise and no amplitude noise. (If you understand       > > what I mean by that.... the quadrature signal looked at x-y on a       > > 'scope is a circle and noise (bumping the table) moves around the       > > perimeter of the circle, but doesn't change the radius, that was not       > > for you Phil, but for those reading along at home.)       > >       > > George H.       >       > Cute, and much cheaper than using waveplates, if you can afford the       > power loss. (BTW I never feel like you're talking down to me, don't       > worry. There's all sorts of stuff I don't know, or have forgotten, or       > haven't thought about.)       >       > I usually use a QWP in each arm and a polarizing beam splitter. That       > gets rid of the beam going back to the laser, and the recombined beams       > are in orthogonal linear polarizations. Another PBS or (ideally) a       > Wollaston prism at 45 degrees in the output arm produces two       > interference signals 180 degrees out of phase. Subtracting them after       > detection gets rid of the residual AM noise (autobalancing helps a lot).              Oh... that's fun. I think we have all the pieces/ parts except for the QWP       (in the visible.)       I do have some 3-D glasses I nicked from the movie theater.       I think those have both polarizer and waveplate...              George H.       >       > Coincidentally I have a project going that will use a frequency counter       > to do Doppler velocity measurements. It's a great deal simpler than a       > big digitizer/FPGA back end (which I wouldn't know how to build anyway),       > at the cost of ~ 5 dB of SNR.       >       > Running a comparator at the zero crossings of the difference signal is a       > win for that. (An AM detector supplies the gate signal for the counter,       > so we only count when the SNR is reasonable, i.e. more than about 8.)       >       > Cheers       >       > Phil Hobbs       >       >       > --       > Dr Philip C D Hobbs       > Principal Consultant       > ElectroOptical Innovations LLC       > Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics       >       > 160 North State Road #203       > Briarcliff Manor NY 10510       >       > hobbs at electrooptical dot net       > http://electrooptical.net              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca