Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,100 of 12,750    |
|    RichD to Skywise    |
|    Re: dumb question on lasers    |
|    26 Aug 15 12:21:26    |
      From: r_delaney2001@yahoo.com              On August 22, Skywise wrote:       >>> Lasers are useful for their low dispersion.       >>> What I wonder is, why are they necessary for the       >>> most common applications? e.g. bar codes, CD readers,       >>> My point is that collimated, non-coherent light       >>> was developed long before the laser.       >       >> Sure, starlight for instance. The problem with spatially incoherent       >> sources such as LEDs and tungsten lamps is that in order to get a small       >> focused spot, you have to trade away almost all of your light.       >       > Am I remembering correctly that the output from a laser is       > 'appears' as a point source? And from that you can "get a small       > focused spot" WITHOUT "[trading] away almost all of your light".              I'm still unclear - if a light source is focused and       collimated into a tight beam, where is the light "traded away"?              I recall working on a photolithography project once, with       a mercury arc lamp source, a series of (very expensive)       lenses focused the light, worked fine. Nobody mentioned       anything about using a laser for greater efficiency. As       you can suss from my questions, I wasn't on the optical team -              --       Rich              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca