Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,142 of 12,750    |
|    Lu Wei to RichD    |
|    Re: measuring phase    |
|    27 Oct 15 11:20:42    |
      From: luweitest@address.invalid              On 2015-10-27 7:13, RichD wrote:       > At an image processing seminar last week, I saw a startling presentation.       > The speaker noted that we cannot measure phase at optical wavelengths,       > hence costs a major loss of information. To illustrate, he displayed two       > face photos, then swapped the phase, with no modification of the       > magnitudes. The faces switched places, with slight distortion! He's       > researching algorithms to recover phase.       >       > Which made me wonder: what 's the highest frequency where we can       > measure phase, and with what accuracy?       >       > Also, a theoretical question manifests - why is it, that most of the       > information is in the phase? You'd expect 50-50.       >       Image is spatial distribution of EM wave, so the information includes       amplitude & frequency (rendered as spectra), phase, and their spatial       distribution. Phase carries least information compared to others.       Holography uses that information to build 3D images.              --       Regards,       Lu Wei       PGP key ID: 0x92CCE1EA              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca