Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,218 of 12,750    |
|    RichD to gghe...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: silicon mirror    |
|    23 Feb 16 17:22:53    |
      From: r_delaney2001@yahoo.com              On February 23, gghe...@gmail.com wrote:       >>> I atended a presentation of the LIGO discovery last week,       >>> by the lead engineer on the interferometry, the limiting       >>> factor on the whole shebang       >>> At conclusion, he forecast a schedule of long term performance       >>> improvements. One of these, 10 years out, is the use of silicon,       >>> or silicon oxide, mirrors.       >       > > Probably that as a single crystal with a very low dislocation density,       > > it should have essentially zero residual stress and hence zero creep.       >       > I was visiting caltech ~2002-3? and talking with a staff/physics       > guy. He runs advanced labs 1/2 time and works on ligo 1/2 time.       > He said one of the issue's was 1/f type noise due to thermal       > relaxations somewhere in the mirror mounts... (or something like that.)              The speaker was Rana Adhikari, Caltech faculty.       He's been working on this for 20 years. He told       some personal stories of advisors' counsel to       avoid the LIGO project, which was likely a dead       end, technically and careerwise, as grav. waves       would never be detected.              Interestingly, he's a pure experimentalist. Later, he       directed all theoretical questions regarding relativity       to Kip Thorn, who was also present.              --       Rich              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca