Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,279 of 12,750    |
|    little sailor to All    |
|    Re: Illumination engineering books    |
|    06 Nov 16 22:18:36    |
      From: jotrs@hotmail.de              Am 02.11.2016 um 00:18 schrieb Adam Hirst:              >>       >       > I know I'm very late in responding to this, but if the OP is no longer       > available, at least my post might be useful to someone else.       >                     I am the OP, and I thank you very much for your analysis.              In the meantime I had already "converged" to the book of Chaves, I find       it - up to the pont where i read it, that is the first explanations       about flow lines, detailed and reasonably easy to follow.              I have also read through the book of Koshel and I agree that it is more       of a reference book than a book for learning design techniques (although       I do not remember anymore what I read, it was the impression that I got       at the time). Moreover - I started with Welford and Winston (I do not       know if Winston, Miñano and Benítez is based on that!) I read and       experimented a bit with the edge ray principle, but I wasn't able to       understand what is a flow line and why it is useful from their       explanation; that is when I switched to the book of Chaves.              By the way for a software I bought myself LensLab (the entry level       version of Optica), I find it much fun to work with and - even if I do       not have any other significant experience with optical design programs -       I do have the guess that for learning it is better than standard       programs (which anyway I decided not to buy as I did not want to invest       the couple of thousands Euro for something that I yet don't know where       will go); and the reason is that Mathematica gives one much flexibility       to analyze the system according to one's wishes.       One problem with LensLab is that the intersections with the surfaces are       not always found - I experimented in different ways and at the end for       example I had to give up reproducing a diagram in Welford and Winston,       the one where the rays that hit a CPC are classified according whether       they are transmitted or rejected and for the transmitted ones the nubmer       of reflections is counted. I know that Optica is better on that respect,       but again it is much more expensive.                     ---       Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.       https://www.avast.com/antivirus              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca