Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,309 of 12,750    |
|    laloum.eric@gmail.com to All    |
|    Re: Focused or collimated beam onto a ph    |
|    04 May 17 10:18:20    |
      > >> Hi all,       > >>       > >> In most of the optical layout I can see for photodetection, light arrives       as a focused beam onto the photodetector. I'm wondering if it would equally       work with a collimated beam (parallel) onto the detector (without any focusing       lens in front of        detector). For large area photodetectors, like the photocathode of a PMT, it       seems to me that a collimated beam would generate a more repeatable response       compared to a beam focused onto one single point, notably in case of       photocathode response non-       uniformity.       > >> Of course, for imaging detectors, it's clear to me that detector plane       must be optically conjugated to sample plane. However, for photometric       measurements, where image is not needed, I don't really understand the       interest of optical conjugation        between sample and detector.       > >>       > >> Thanks,       > >        > > For laser sources I rarely use a lens. Just send the beam onto        > > a photodiode, align from maximum signal.        > >        >        > Yup. Focusing light down on the detector is a win if you're in a low       > light or high speed situation, because you can use a smaller detector       > that is faster and has lower capacitance and less area to pick up       > background light. It doesn't help anything if the detector is big       > enough to handle the whole beam.       >        > The drawbacks are nonlinearity and possible detector damage.       >        > If the beam is mildly too large for the detector, then you can use a       > lens well out of focus to adjust the spot size to the detector area.       >        > Cheers       >        > Phil Hobbs       >        > --        > Dr Philip C D Hobbs       > Principal Consultant       > ElectroOptical Innovations LLC       > Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics       >        > 160 North State Road #203       > Briarcliff Manor NY 10510       >        > hobbs at electrooptical dot net       > http://electrooptical.net              Hi,              Thanks for the explanation. Now, I'm a bit puzzled. It's often said that       photodetector like photodiode gives an output (photocurrent) propotional to       irradiance (W/m²). But irradiance is not conserved and is notably not the       same for a collimated beam or        a focused beam. I would be more at ease if photodetector would response to       radiance (W/m²/steradian), because of radiance conservation principle. There       is something wrong somewhere ! Can you help ?              Thanks              Eric              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca