Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,358 of 12,750    |
|    JTS to Phil Hobbs    |
|    Re: Measuring sunlight strength througho    |
|    04 Oct 17 22:38:27    |
      From: pireddag@hotmail.com              On 2017-10-04 16:28, Phil Hobbs wrote:       > On 10/04/2017 04:29 AM, JTS wrote:       >> On 2017-10-04 03:55, malna.polya@gmail.com wrote:       >>> Hi All,       >>>       >>> I am working on a project: we have a light sensor with only around 40       >>> degrees field of view. Our goal is to measure the strength of the       >>> sunlight without introducing too much of a bias based on the time of       >>> the day - when the sun shines at a different angle. We want to keep       >>> the sensor stationary.       >>>              (cut)              >>>       >>> Another concern is to find a solution which doesn't filter out much of       >>> the light spectrum.       >>>       >>> Does anyone have any ideas on how to solve this challenge?       >>>       >>> Thank you in advance!       >>>       >>       >>       >> Other posters have more experience and might comment on this, but I have       >> got a feeling that the theorem of conservation of etendue makes what you       >> want impossible. If you want to decrease the angular spread of a source       >> (and this is what you want to do: a source emitting at different angles       >> for different times is the same as a source emitting at different angles       >> at the same time for what regards the theorem) then you have to increase       >> the area which the light crosses. I think this is what is happening in       >> the solution with a set of lenses.       >              >       > The OP can do pretty well with a non-imaging concentrator run backwards,       > i.e. small end towards the sky. Of course it has to be smallish in       > order for the big end to fit the available detector, and there's still a       > cosine rolloff due to obliquity.       >                     Yes, excellent: you need to decrease the area from where you collect the       light and you will be able to get light with the reduced angular       distribution at the detector.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca