Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,363 of 12,750    |
|    whit3rd to glen walpert    |
|    Re: Measuring sunlight strength througho    |
|    11 Oct 17 04:40:20    |
      From: whit3rd@gmail.com              On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-7, glen walpert wrote:       > On Mon, 09 Oct 2017 16:38:18 -0700, whit3rd wrote:       >       > > On Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 6:55:37 PM UTC-7, malna...@gmail.com       > > wrote:       > >       > >> I am working...to measure the strength of the sunlight without       > >> introducing too much of a bias based on the time of the day - when the       > >> sun shines at a different angle              > > Well, the classical approach is to use a crystal ball, and a carved       > > wooden screen.              > Interesting approach, but for simple electronic monitoring with no moving       > parts how about the method used by photographic lightmeters for       > omnidirectional measurement, a spherical diffuser placed over the       > detector,              A good approach too, is an integrating sphere; basically, a white sphere       with a porthole, or (to get fancy) two spheres, with a porthole into the       first, and an aperture from the first to the second, with the sensor       in the second.              The weakness, is that the direction of the illumination can be       edge-on to the circular hole, it isn't really as omnidirectional       as you'd like. The hemisphere diffusers subtend pi *R*R as lit       from their axis of rotation, but only pi * R*R/2 if the source       is 90 degrees to that...              The angle dependence for a flat window is as cos(theta), so you       get 1% diminution after 8 degrees; a belt of hemispheres       at 16 degree intervals (22 sensors) and a choose-whichever-is-brightest       rule might do a good measurement job. If you       need not only the plane of the ecliptic but the full 4pi steradians       covered, it's up to a couple of hundred sensors.              More practical, would be a couple of hundred light fibers, aimed all different       directions,       with end B coupled to a single, nonspherical plate of a sensor.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca