Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,366 of 12,750    |
|    David Miller to All    |
|    Minimum Measurable astigmatism with Shac    |
|    07 Dec 17 11:33:49    |
      From: dave.scienceman@gmail.com              Hi,              I just found this forum, and it seemed like the perfect place to ask about       this. I have an older Shack-Harmann WFS from WaveFront Sciences. I was using       it to check colimation for a holography set-up, and no matter what, the       minimum measured astigmatism        was ~lambda/10. All other aberations (defocus, coma, spherical) were       ~lambda/50. THe RMS wavefront deviation is ~lambda/30, mostly due to       astigmatism, it would seem.               After some digging, I found a Blue Sky Collimeter in the back of a cabinet in       the lab, and used this for an independent measure. The beam *blinks* on and       off - so it would seem the phase is very flat.              I tested the calibration of the WFS by placing it several meters from a       pinhole, and measuring the radius of curvature. It was within the error of my       tape measure.              Is there a minimum phase error a WFS, or its software, can measure correctly?        As in, if the error is too small, numerical noise or something else becomes an       issue? Could it be that after all these years, the hardware no longer matches       the calibration        file?              Thanks for any feedback,       David              --        David Miller       Graduate Research Assistant       Department of Electrical Engineering       University of Colorado              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca