Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,370 of 12,750    |
|    RichD to All    |
|    Rayleigh vs. Nyquist    |
|    12 Dec 17 15:36:43    |
      From: r_delaney2001@yahoo.com              Consider the Nyquist criterion for sampling a continuous        waveform - 2x bandwidth - then the Rayleigh resolution        principle - peaks must separate by at least 1 wavelength.               Don't these look much analogous?        Especially as λ = 1/f              Ruminating a bit more... Nyquist sampling can be        viewed as a mandate to sample each period, at least        twice. And, Rayleigh mandates that the image be        'sampled' twice, in the sense of a peak and trough.              It strikes me they may be equivalent, in some deeper        sense. Has anyone ever tried to derive such a result,        mathematically?              I can't be the first to ever conjecture this -               --       Rich              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca