Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,402 of 12,750    |
|    Michael Koch to All    |
|    Eyepieces for fast f/2.8 telescopes    |
|    03 Jun 18 11:28:26    |
      From: astroelectronic@t-online.de              Hello all,              I have tested a few TeleVue Ethos eyepieces with a Zygo interferometer at a       very fast f/2.8 light cone (tested with a f/1.9 transmission sphere, and       aperture limited in software to 67.9%).       Three tested eyepieces have quite different amounts of spherical aberration:       21mm Ethos Z8 = 0.80 waves (undercorrected)       13mm Ethos Z8 = 0.33 waves (undercorrected)       8mm Ethos Z8 = -0.48 waves (overcorrected)              Now let's compare two cases:       Case 1: A f/2.8 paraboloid mirror is perfect, and the eyepiece has 1 wave of       spherical aberration.       Case 2: A paraboloid mirror has 1 wave of spherical aberration, and the       eyepiece is perfect.       When we make a star test with these two telescopes, will we see the same error       in both cases? Or can we argue that the error in the eyepiece is less severe,       because it occurs closer to the observer's eye?              The backgound of my question is that a friend of me has figured a 14" f/2.8       mirror, and we think the mirror is quite good, verified by two independant       tests.       However when making the star test the mirror isn't as good as expected. We are       trying to figure out what's going on.              Thanks,       Michael              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca