Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,404 of 12,750    |
|    Phil Hobbs to Michael Koch    |
|    Re: Eyepieces for fast f/2.8 telescopes    |
|    04 Jun 18 11:33:47    |
      From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net              On 06/03/2018 02:28 PM, Michael Koch wrote:       > Hello all,       >       > I have tested a few TeleVue Ethos eyepieces with a Zygo interferometer at a       very fast f/2.8 light cone (tested with a f/1.9 transmission sphere, and       aperture limited in software to 67.9%).       > Three tested eyepieces have quite different amounts of spherical aberration:       > 21mm Ethos Z8 = 0.80 waves (undercorrected)       > 13mm Ethos Z8 = 0.33 waves (undercorrected)       > 8mm Ethos Z8 = -0.48 waves (overcorrected)       >       > Now let's compare two cases:       > Case 1: A f/2.8 paraboloid mirror is perfect, and the eyepiece has 1 wave of       spherical aberration.       > Case 2: A paraboloid mirror has 1 wave of spherical aberration, and the       eyepiece is perfect.       > When we make a star test with these two telescopes, will we see the same       error in both cases? Or can we argue that the error in the eyepiece is less       severe, because it occurs closer to the observer's eye?       >       > The backgound of my question is that a friend of me has figured a 14" f/2.8       mirror, and we think the mirror is quite good, verified by two independant       tests.       > However when making the star test the mirror isn't as good as expected. We       are trying to figure out what's going on.       >              The pupil of the eye will be the limiting aperture if the system is       designed for comfort, but it may or may not be in a test setup.              In the absence of vignetting, I think they'll be pretty similar since       both are basically occurring in the pupil (of the telescope). If the       eyepiece were optically closer to the image, the effect would be less,       because the phase errors would have mainly a local effect, and of course       right at the image, it would hardly do anything except change the FOV.       (It would be a field lens and not an eyepiece.)              Cheers              Phil Hobbs              --       Dr Philip C D Hobbs       Principal Consultant       ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics       Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics       Briarcliff Manor NY 10510              http://electrooptical.net       https://hobbs-eo.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca