Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,410 of 12,750    |
|    Michael Koch to All    |
|    Re: Eyepieces for fast f/2.8 telescopes    |
|    18 Jun 18 08:57:41    |
      From: astroelectronic@t-online.de              Phil,              I'm not sure if I have understood all this correctly. Let's use another       example:              We are star testing a lens with 10cm diameter and 100cm focal length.              Case 1: The lens has 10 waves of astigmatism (over the full 10cm aperture).       The spot size in the best focal plane will be much larger than the Airy disk.              Case 2: The lens is perfect, but we put an astigmatic window exactly in the       middle between the lens and the focal plane. The window introduces 10 waves of       astigmatism (over 5cm aperture) into the light cone.              In both cases the light cone has 10 waves of astigmatism when it arrives at       the focal plane.       But I think case 2 will have a smaller spot size than case 1. Do you agree?              Case 3: Let's assume the astigmatic window is placed at distance x in front of       the perfect lens. In this case the spot size is independant of distance x,       right?              Are there any general rules how to estimate the spot size, depending on the       position along the light path where the aberration is introduced?              Thanks,       Michael              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca