Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,467 of 12,750    |
|    ggherold@gmail.com to Phil Hobbs    |
|    Re: Help needed in extracting signal fro    |
|    24 Dec 19 21:53:48    |
      On Friday, December 20, 2019 at 4:13:56 PM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:       > On 2019-12-20 13:05, ggherold@gmail.com wrote:       > > On Wednesday, December 18, 2019 at 11:17:49 AM UTC-5, adamstr...@gmail.com       wrote:       > >> I'm trying to form a gray-scale image of a scene by scanning it with a       laser in daylight.       > >>       > >> The setup is, I stare at the entire scene with a stationary lens and a       single photodetector (and this does not scan, but takes in the entire scene),       and then I scan a laser spot across the scene to build up a rastered image.       > >> The light contribution from the entire background is 8000X brighter than       the light from the laser spot.       > >> I have heard that it is possible to extract faint signals from a noisy       background by modulating the signal (the laser spot) and extracting the       matching frequency components from the noise, which sounds crazy to me       because, well, the noise is 8000X        greater than the signal, and any detector is going to have a hard time seeing,       say, 1000 photons on top of 8,000,000.       > >>       > >> What am I missing? I'm not a signal-processing guy, if that wasn't       obvious already.       > >>       > >> Can modulating the laser spot enable me to build up a grayscale image of       the scene, and if so, how, or should I take a different approach?       > >        > > A narrow band pass filter (Interference filter) centered on the laser       > > wavelength would help a lot. (maybe you already have one?)       > > Seems like there will alos be a distance effect in the reflected laser       > > light. Objects twice as far away will only scatter 1/4 the photons       > > into your detector.... maybe that's what you want?       > >        > > George H.       > >        >        > If the filter is on a flat surface, angle tuning will limit the FOV, though.       Ahh, yeah right... an artful choice of BW maybe?               George H.               >        > Cheers       >        > Phil Hobbs       >        > --        > Dr Philip C D Hobbs       > Principal Consultant       > ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics       > Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics       > Briarcliff Manor NY 10510       >        > http://electrooptical.net       > http://hobbs-eo.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca