Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,513 of 12,750    |
|    Phil Hobbs to adamstrange8w7@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Question about matching the lens to     |
|    05 Aug 20 06:48:14    |
      From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net              On 2020-08-04 13:08, adamstrange8w7@gmail.com wrote:       > I am designing an infrared lens to work at 10 microns. I have a       > detector with a 12 micron pitch and a system maximum aperture of 95       > mm. What would be the optimum focal length for this lens? I realize       > that it is best to have two pixels across the Airy disk, which would       > mean this system should a focal length of 80 mm.              At some point the FOV has to come into the equation. Otherwise you can       oversample the image as much as you want.              >       > However, the customer wants the resolution equivalent of a       > diffraction-limited system with a focal length of 200 mm, which of       > course is not happening with this aperture and this detector pitch.              Why not? The FL just determines what the angular subtense of each pixel       is. The image-side numerical aperture is what determines the maximum       available resolution for a given wavelength.              > but I was wondering if there is some optimum value for a mismatch       > between the lens and a detector? Some focal length which would allow       > the unresolved details of the scene to best be extracted?              Professional astronomers with relatively deep pockets often use four       pixels per cycle at Nyquist. Amateurs have to trade off the diameter       and FOV of the scope (which determine the image NA) vs. the available       budget.              >       > The system will be taking several images of the scene, and they       > could, theoretically, be combined to increase the level of detail.       >       > Thanks in advance for your replies.       >              Cheers              Phil Hobbs       --       Dr Philip C D Hobbs       Principal Consultant       ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics       Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics       Briarcliff Manor NY 10510              http://electrooptical.net       http://hobbs-eo.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca