Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,580 of 12,750    |
|    Phil Hobbs to Lu Wei    |
|    Re: IR thermometers    |
|    01 Jul 21 21:25:05    |
      From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net              Lu Wei wrote:       > On 2021-6-27 1:29, RichD wrote:       >> I wonder about those IR thermometers so prevalent       >> during the past year. Previously, I recall seeing them       >> at deli salad bars, used to monitor the sour tureens.       >>       >> I understand the physics, the relationship between       >> spectrum and temperature. What is the accuracy,       >> considering the problems of focus and reflection,       >> and ambient noise?       >>       > The accuracy is not good to my impression, but it's just for quick       > scanning. And they usually have no emissivity setting (I guess they are       > fixed to 0.95 or so).       >       >> What's the internal sensor?       >>       >              So much of the 'precautions' of the last year or more have been pretty       much theatre. Even if the IR gun was perfectly accurate, and       irrespective of my state of health, the temperature of my forehead when       I've just come in from outside is going to be quite different between       January and July.              Cheers              Phil Hobbs              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca