Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,582 of 12,750    |
|    Dieter Michel to All    |
|    Re: glare    |
|    03 Jul 21 01:34:06    |
      From: dmichel@prosound.de              Rich,               > Attempting to use a laptop outdoors recently, to        > great frustration, I wonder about the phenomenon        > of washout.              the ambient light is scattered and reflected off the       laptop screen and so produces an ambient light luminance       - say La - that adds to the light that is generated by       the display itself - Ld. It also adds to the luminance       Lb of the display when it displays black image content.              The full screen contrast of your laptop is normally       defined as the luminance for full white content Lw       divided by the aforementioned Lb (black content:              Cfs = Lw / Lb              Cfs may typically be in the order of around 700-1000       for a notebook display.              Values taken from a real measurements e.g. were              Lw = 310 cd/m²       Lb = 0,42 cd/m²              Cfs = 738(:1)              The same display produced a luminance Lad of about       5 cd/m² at an ambient light illuminance of 5000 Lux       under diffuse lighting conditions.              So this adds to both Lw and Lb produced by the display,       so the new full screen contrast at 5000lx ambient light       illuminance was:              Cfsa = (Lw + Lad)/(Lb + Lad) = (310 + 5)/(0,42 + 5)               = 315/5,42 = 58,12                     So, the influence of the ambient light makes the       screen contrast drop from 738:1 to just about 58:1.              5000lx is not so untypical for daylight, it can be much       more on a sunny summer day.              Plus, the numbers above are for diffuse reflections       off the screen surface, which, from the numbers, seems       to have been a "glare display" with some antireflective       coating.              If you can see the ambient light source as a (dim)       mirror image on the screen surface, the contrast       may be significantly smaller, such as e.g. less       than 5:1 for the same display.               > Or likewise, in a dark cinema, a brightly        > lit door opens, and contrast diminishes.              In a front projection situation, the effect is much       more dominant because the projection screen is white       and so diffusely reflects much more light than an       LCD screen.              In the above example, the LCD screen produced only       like 5 cd/m² when diffusely lit with an ambient       illuminance of 5000lx. This is not very much and       probably that notebook screen has got some       antireflective coating to enhance it's ambient light       performance.              A projection screen with Gain=1 would produce like       1590 cd/m2 which is much more - but also inevitable       because the screen does reflect light on purpose.              Therefore, it is really difficult to have a front       projection system with a good contrast performance       under daylight conditions. You would need extremely       powerful projectors and when it really comes down       to it, the sun will probably win out all regardless.              All the best,              Dieter              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca