Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,610 of 12,750    |
|    Phil Hobbs to Rhydian    |
|    Re: Optics question (Fresnel equations)    |
|    10 Feb 22 11:35:31    |
      XPost: sci.electronics.design       From: pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net              Rhydian wrote:       > Hi,       >       > I'm building an optical instrument that points a 850nm LED at a boundary       > between two materials at an oblique angle, and measures the (specular)       > reflection with a photodiode at the same (opposite) angle.       >       > The first few prototypes are working well but I want to compare the       > performance I'm getting with the theoretical limits. My starting point       > is the Fresnel equations, but the part I'm having trouble with is that       > they give separate results for the s and p polarizations. How do I       > combine the two into a total reflected power?       >       > As the incident angle approaches the critical angle for total reflection,       > both the s and p numbers approach unity, so clearly I can't just sum       > them, or take the vector sum, or I would get an answer greater than 1.       > Average? Use the highest of the two?       >       > I'm assuming here that the photodiode detector (Osram SFH2700) has a       > response that's insensitive to polarization, but happy to be corrected on       > this point.       >       > I have a copy of "Building Electro-Optical Systems" but there's clearly       > something I'm missing. Google is not much help either, it finds pretty-       > much exactly the same question (but for microwaves rather than IR) from       > two years ago, and no replies.       >       > TIA       >       > Rhydian       > (who should probably have paid more attention in electromagnetics classes       > 30 years ago)       >              You just treat the two polarizations independently and add up the       photocurrents when you're done.              LEDs are pretty well unpolarized when you look at them from a distance.              There are polarization effects with angle, due to the Fresnel       reflections from the top surface. If the LED has a flat top facet,       p-polarized light escapes better, so there's a tendency for the light to       be somewhat radially-polarized. Textured surfaces and lensed packages       smear that out pretty well, though, so to leading order your LED should       be unpolarized.              Thus, it's a good guess to assume the LED light has equal amounts of s-       and p-polarized light. These don't interfere, so the total photocurrent       is just the sum of the s and p photocurrents.              Cheers              Phil Hobbs              --       Dr Philip C D Hobbs       Principal Consultant       ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics       Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics       Briarcliff Manor NY 10510              http://electrooptical.net       http://hobbs-eo.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca