Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,619 of 12,750    |
|    RichD to Phil Hobbs    |
|    Re: polarized sunglasses    |
|    08 Apr 22 14:25:52    |
      From: r_delaney2001@yahoo.com              On April 7, Phil Hobbs wrote:       >> How does polarization of light improve a sunglasses       >> quality? Or the "sunglass experience", so to speak -       >> That is, I presume the usual definition - the lens       >> passes light polarized along a single direction.              > When light reflects obliquely off a dielectric surface, such as water or       > the shiny hood of your car, the reflection is partially polarized,       > usually with the vertical polarization much weaker than horizontal.       > That means that the electric (E) field is vibrating mostly in the       > horizontal direction. (I'm assuming that the surface is horizontal and       > the light is coming from above, which is the usual situation outdoors.)       > So the glints are polarized and the rest of the scene mostly isn't. (*)       > Thus polarizing filters that absorb the horizontal polarization       > selectively reduce the glints.              So this type of filter removes the bit we commonly call glare.              But there's no free lunch. So what's the loss or cost?              > The reason is interesting. The electric field of a light ray       > oscillates, but is directed perpendicular to the propagation direction.       > At an interface between two non-absorbing dielectrics, the reflected and       > refracted beams go in different directions, but their fields have to add       > up to the same as the incident wave. The addition is vectorial, so       > there's a difference between horizontal polarization, which stays       horizontal, and       > vertical, which has to change directions on account of the change in       > propagation direction.       >       > It turns out that when the reflected and refracted rays are at 90       > degrees to each other, in vertical polarization the reflection goes to       > zero and in horizontal polarization it doesn't. The incidence angle       > where this happens is called "Brewster's angle" after its discoverer.                     I'm familiar with Brewster angle, but unclear how it affects       sunglass performance, i.e. the subjective experience.              --       Rich              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca