Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,652 of 12,750    |
|    Henry Nebrensky to HoloLab    |
|    Re: fringe lock system    |
|    12 Feb 23 14:43:31    |
      From: torty5737@gmail.com              On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 15:41:42 UTC, HoloLab wrote:       > > On Thursday, October 24, 2002 at 11:01:10 AM UTC+2, BS wrote:        > > If you need high frequency locking, I suggest you actually lock your       fringes        > > around a fixed frequency, not around a fixed position. For instance,        > > introduce a 100Hz movement into one of the mirrors of your setup via a       piezo        > > and correct this movement with a second mirror of the setup (also on a        > > piezo). The advantage here is that because your mirrors are already        > > vibrating at a 'high' frequency (but out of phase so as to cancel their        > > movements), you get a much higher bandwith in the correction of random       phase        > > shift errors...              I'm possibly being thick here, and my hands on holography experience is       decades out of date, but I'm struggling to find an intuitive understanding for       why vibrating the mirror is better vis-a-vis random phase shifts: surely half       the time the mirror is        travelling in the wrong direction, so first you have to stop it, and then move       it to the right place but you have now less time to do so (owing to time spent       halting it)...              Maybe if the vibration was mains-electricity related (motors, etc.) it would       make more sense?              Thanks              Henry              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca