Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.optics    |    Discussion relating to the science of op    |    12,750 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,747 of 12,750    |
|    Michal Wlodarczyk to All    |
|    Simple color air absorbance meter projec    |
|    07 Jan 26 19:03:40    |
      From: michal@mpp.edu.pl              Hello,              I am considering a hobby-level project to build a simple and low-cost       open-path two (or three) wavelength absorbance meter for atmospheric       measurements targeting nitrogen oxides (NOx), which exhibit yellow/brown       color, lying in the visible range.              The basic idea is an active system with a transmitter/receiver unit on one       side and a retroreflector placed approximately 10–100 m away. I am       currently       considering two wavelengths, one 405 nm and second not critical but maybe       530 nm, to allow differential absorbance measurements.              For the receiver, I am thinking of using a PIN photodiode placed at the       focus of a relatively large lens to increase beam diameter and make system       less prone to air instability, het haze etc.              The main uncertainty concerns the transmitter side. One idea is to use       high-power LEDs and couple the emitted light into the same optical axis as       the by reflecting it off plain glass plates (microscope slides?) placed in       front of the photodiode. LEDs are inexpensive and can provide substantial       optical power, so emission strength is not the primary concern. Probably       LEDs are far better than laser diodes in this setup - high power, no       speckles and paradoxically not being point source.              However, I am worried about stray reflections, surface       scratches, dust on the glass plates and lens and general backscatter       potentially       overwhelming the weak signal returning from the distant retroreflector.       A polarizer in front of the photodiode might help, but I am unsure whether       this would be sufficient in practice.       In principle, at these path lengths it might be possible to discriminate       the returning signal based on time-of-flight, but I am not sure whether       this is practically achievable with LEDs (or lasers) and a simple       photodiode-based receiver.              I would appreciate any thoughts, references, or alternative optical       layouts.              Best regards,       Michal Wlodarczyk              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca