home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.physics.research      Current physics research. (Moderated)      17,516 messages   

   17516   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Collision, Energy, and Force   

   21 Feb 26 23:27:42   

   4k   

   17515   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Collision, Energy, and Force   

   18 Feb 26 17:43:15   

   3k   

   17514   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Collision, Energy, and Force   

   17 Feb 26 19:23:28   

   1k   

   17513   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Elastic Collision   

   16 Feb 26 17:14:55   

   5k   

   17512   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Elastic Collision   

   15 Feb 26 00:26:34   

   2k   

   17511   

   Luigi Fortunati to Kaukasoina   

   Re: Elastic Collision   

   14 Feb 26 23:52:00   

   3k   

   17510   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Elastic Collision   

   15 Feb 26 11:02:46   

   3k   

   17509   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Elastic Collision   

   12 Feb 26 23:26:45   

   2k   

   17508   

   Pierre Asselin to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Elastic Collision   

   13 Feb 26 18:05:45   

   1k   

   17507   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Elastic Collision   

   13 Feb 26 18:05:31   

   2k   

   17506   

   Petri Kaukasoina to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Elastic Collision   

   13 Feb 26 18:05:38   

   2,004b   

   17505   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Elastic Collision   

   11 Feb 26 22:30:55   

   1k   

   17504   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Tug of War   

   21 Jan 26 22:20:40   

   3k   

   17503   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Tug of War   

   22 Jan 26 22:55:13   

   3k   

   17502   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Tug of War   

   20 Jan 26 08:37:53   

   2k   

   17501   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Tug of War   

   17 Jan 26 18:00:22   

   1k   

   17500   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Tug of War   

   14 Jan 26 22:25:03   

   5k   

   17499   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Tug of War   

   11 Jan 26 19:51:49   

   5k   

   17498   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Tug of War   

   03 Jan 26 22:22:58   

   4k   

   17497   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Tug of War   

   01 Jan 26 00:33:56   

   5k   

   17496   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Tug of War   

   26 Dec 25 13:41:24   

   6k   

   17495   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Tug of War (1/2)   

   30 Dec 25 18:31:27   

   7k   

   17494   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to mt2.1.4-99339-1767148287@gold.bkis-   

   Re: Tug of War   

   02 Jan 26 00:12:02   

   4k   

   17493   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Tug of War   

   24 Dec 25 22:56:01   

   3k   

   17492   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to All   

   Re: Tug of War (2/2)   

   24 Dec 25 23:28:13   

   3k   

   17491   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to All   

   Re: Tug of War (1/2)   

   24 Dec 25 23:28:13   

   7k   

   17490   

   Luigi Fortunati to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Tug of War   

   19 Dec 25 23:36:25   

   1k   

   17489   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Tug of War   

   19 Dec 25 01:30:40   

   3k   

   17488   

   Stefan Ram to Hendrik van Hees   

   Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector?   

   05 Dec 25 13:41:20   

   1k   

   17487   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Acting forces (2/2)   

   29 Nov 25 00:08:10   

   2k   

   17486   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Acting forces (2/2)   

   27 Nov 25 16:33:34   

   2k   

   17485   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Acting forces   

   22 Nov 25 12:18:46   

   1,733b   

   17484   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to All   

   Re: Inertia and the Principles of Dynami   

   11 Nov 25 00:02:12   

   1,733b   

   17483   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to All   

   Re: Inertia and the Principles of Dynami   

   10 Nov 25 19:22:27   

   1k   

   17482   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to All   

   Re: Inertia and the Principles of Dynami   

   10 Nov 25 19:22:27   

   7k   

   17481   

   Luigi Fortunati to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Inertia and the Principles of Dynami   

   07 Nov 25 12:49:08   

   4k   

   17480   

   Luigi Fortunati to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Inertia and the Principles of Dynami   

   09 Nov 25 00:04:21   

   3k   

   17479   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Inertia and the Principles of Dynami   

   03 Nov 25 23:49:28   

   2,987b   

   17478   

   Luigi Fortunati to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from    

   27 Oct 25 00:00:20   

   2k   

   17477   

   Luigi Fortunati to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from    

   20 Oct 25 19:08:24   

   3k   

   17476   

   Pierre Asselin to Mikko   

   Re: Is force transmitted?   

   15 Oct 25 12:23:05   

   1k   

   17475   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from    

   11 Oct 25 17:10:16   

   1,092b   

   17474   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Is force transmitted?   

   11 Oct 25 17:15:48   

   1,092b   

   17473   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to All   

   derivation of Newton's 3rd law from 2nd    

   02 Oct 25 15:03:51   

   3k   

   17472   

   Thomas Koenig to dr.j.thornburg@gmail-pink.com   

   Re: Towed car   

   01 Oct 25 22:42:04   

   2k   

   17471   

   Luigi Fortunati to dr.j.thornburg@gmail-pink.com   

   Re: Towed car   

   01 Oct 25 22:41:10   

   4k   

   17470   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to All   

   derivation of Newton's 3rd law from 2nd    

   01 Oct 25 22:45:04   

   7k   

   17469   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to All   

   Re: Towed car   

   30 Sep 25 12:12:28   

   3k   

   17468   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Two equal and opposite forces   

   29 Sep 25 21:40:54   

   3,538b   

   17467   

   Jos Bergervoet to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The Lindblad Picture. Solving The Ri   

   19 Sep 25 13:17:54   

   2k   

   17466   

   Lydia Marie Williamson to All   

   The Lindblad Picture. Solving The Riddle   

   28 Aug 25 09:05:40   

   3k   

   17465   

   Lydia Marie Williamson to All   

   The Lindblad Picture. Solving The Riddle   

   28 Aug 25 09:05:40   

   7k   

   17464   

   Lydia Marie Williamson to All   

   The Lindblad Picture. Solving The Riddle   

   28 Aug 25 09:05:40   

   7k   

   17463   

   Stefan Ram to Lydia Marie Williamson   

   Re: The Lindblad Picture. Solving The Ri   

   28 Aug 25 19:32:15   

   6,749b   

   17462   

   Luigi Fortunati to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: The dynamometer   

   09 Aug 25 22:11:54   

   2k   

   17461   

   Stefan Ram to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Where's "left"?   

   05 Aug 25 06:43:19   

   2k   

   17460   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   Where's "left"?   

   02 Aug 25 21:57:54   

   2k   

   17459   

   Stefan Ram to Mikko   

   Re: Action and reaction   

   07 Jul 25 10:54:39   

   4k   

   17458   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from    

   05 Jul 25 12:01:37   

   3,687b   

   17457   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The experiment -- action + reaction   

   05 Jul 25 09:42:33   

   2k   

   17456   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from    

   04 Jul 25 19:21:47   

   3k   

   17455   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The spring   

   19 Apr 25 23:53:40   

   1k   

   17454   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The spring   

   17 Apr 25 09:40:06   

   1k   

   17453   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's Third Law and Inertia   

   08 Apr 25 16:01:02   

   2k   

   17452   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's Third Law and Inertia   

   08 Apr 25 11:27:48   

   1k   

   17451   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's Third Law and Inertia   

   07 Apr 25 12:26:37   

   3k   

   17450   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's Third Law and Inertia   

   06 Apr 25 11:50:11   

   2,934b   

   17449   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Newton's Third Law and Inertia   

   05 Apr 25 20:31:24   

   2,934b   

   17448   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The hidden error   

   28 Mar 25 12:16:16   

   2,934b   

   17447   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The "net" force   

   22 Mar 25 16:31:37   

   2,934b   

   17446   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton   

   02 Mar 25 09:14:50   

   1k   

   17445   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton   

   01 Mar 25 09:18:54   

   3k   

   17444   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's Gravity (1/2)   

   08 Jan 25 07:49:57   

   7k   

   17443   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's Gravity   

   07 Jan 25 12:19:34   

   3k   

   17442   

   Jens Schweikhardt to All   

   Re: Newton's Gravity   

   06 Jan 25 15:01:29   

   1k   

   17441   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's Gravity   

   05 Jan 25 16:27:00   

   2k   

   17440   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's Gravity   

   03 Jan 25 22:18:17   

   3k   

   17439   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's Gravity   

   01 Jan 25 18:28:00   

   1k   

   17438   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's Gravity   

   01 Jan 25 08:08:45   

   1k   

   17437   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Newton's Gravity   

   31 Dec 24 14:03:32   

   1k   

   17436   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's Gravity   

   01 Jan 25 08:06:48   

   1k   

   17435   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Elevator in Free Fall   

   30 Dec 24 12:34:55   

   1,057b   

   17434   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Elevator in Free Fall   

   29 Dec 24 12:34:35   

   2k   

   17433   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Elevator in Free Fall   

   29 Dec 24 07:20:44   

   2k   

   17432   

   Hendrik van Hees to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Elevator in Free Fall   

   22 Dec 24 10:35:29   

   5k   

   17431   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Elevator in Free Fall   

   22 Dec 24 08:57:11   

   1k   

   17430   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi   

   Re: The Elevator in Free Fall (2/2)   

   21 Dec 24 08:27:44   

   3k   

   17429   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi   

   Re: The Elevator in Free Fall (1/2)   

   21 Dec 24 08:27:44   

   7k   

   17428   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The Elevator in Free Fall   

   19 Dec 24 22:51:17   

   1k   

   17427   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's 3rd law is wrong   

   20 Nov 24 07:39:34   

   2k   

   17426   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's 3rd law is wrong   

   10 Oct 24 17:42:20   

   3k   

   17425   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's 3rd law is wrong   

   28 Sep 24 18:19:13   

   2k   

   17424   

   Tom Roberts to D. Goncz   

   Re: Imaginary matrices   

   25 Sep 24 22:46:39   

   1k   

   17423   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's 3rd law is wrong   

   23 Sep 24 07:01:41   

   4k   

   17422   

   D. Goncz to All   

   Imaginary matrices   

   22 Sep 24 13:22:33   

   2k   

   17421   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's 3rd law is wrong   

   20 Sep 24 07:26:13   

   2k   

   17420   

   Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 to All   

   Re: Von Neumann cycle stationary plant d   

   16 Sep 24 07:03:31   

   5k   

   17419   

   Sylva Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's 3rd law is wrong   

   16 Sep 24 01:44:42   

   4,752b   

   17418   

   Python to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?A_Web_app_showing_Einstein-Poi   

   08 Sep 24 14:47:49   

   4,752b   

   17417   

   Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 to All   

   Von Neumann cycle stationary plant detai   

   07 Sep 24 08:42:18   

   4,752b   

   17416   

   Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 to All   

   Von Neumann cycle stationary plant detai   

   07 Sep 24 08:42:18   

   6k   

   17415   

   D. Goncz to All   

   Bloch Spheres   

   31 Aug 24 11:48:07   

   3k   

   17414   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Inertia and third principle   

   24 Aug 24 08:46:57   

   1k   

   17413   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Inertia and third principle   

   15 Aug 24 13:52:30   

   1,236b   

   17412   

   Stefan Ram to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector?   

   10 Aug 24 06:16:00   

   1k   

   17411   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Inertia and third principle   

   08 Aug 24 21:15:56   

   1,284b   

   17410   

   Hendrik van Hees to Mikko   

   Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector?   

   09 Aug 24 13:53:39   

   2k   

   17409   

   Stefan Ram to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector?   

   09 Aug 24 13:54:17   

   2k   

   17408   

   Mikko to the moderator   

   Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector?   

   08 Aug 24 21:15:43   

   2,231b   

   17407   

   Mikko to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector?   

   08 Aug 24 11:00:40   

   3k   

   17406   

   Hendrik van Hees to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector?   

   08 Aug 24 07:49:24   

   6k   

   17405   

   Stefan Ram to moderator jt   

   Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector?   

   08 Aug 24 07:02:29   

   3k   

   17404   

   Mikko to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The momentum - a cotangent vector?   

   07 Aug 24 11:37:02   

   1k   

   17403   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   The momentum - a cotangent vector?   

   07 Aug 24 06:54:34   

   1,240b   

   17402   

   Stefan Ram to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Matrix Multiplication in SR   

   01 Aug 24 07:01:38   

   2k   

   17401   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Inertia and third principle   

   22 Jul 24 09:56:42   

   1,665b   

   17400   

   Stefan Ram to Mikko   

   Re: Energy - the "hot potato"?   

   20 Jun 24 12:39:40   

   3k   

   17399   

   Mikko to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Energy - the "hot potato"?   

   19 Jun 24 13:06:59   

   1k   

   17398   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   Energy - the "hot potato"?   

   18 Jun 24 18:25:10   

   1k   

   17397   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Equivalence principle   

   14 Jun 24 12:42:18   

   1k   

   17396   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Space and spacetime   

   15 Jun 24 06:25:15   

   1k   

   17395   

   Hendrik van Hees to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Equivalence principle   

   13 Jun 24 10:38:48   

   2k   

   17394   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Equivalence principle   

   13 Jun 24 08:29:43   

   2,247b   

   17393   

   Hendrik van Hees to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Equivalence principle   

   11 Jun 24 08:46:14   

   2k   

   17392   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Equivalence principle   

   11 Jun 24 07:05:55   

   1k   

   17391   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Experiments on the validity of Relat   

   02 Jun 24 07:42:06   

   1,060b   

   17390   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   Falling into a black hole   

   26 May 24 16:46:52   

   3k   

   17389   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Experiments on the validity of Relat   

   19 May 24 13:49:50   

   5k   

   17388   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Experiments on the validity of Relat   

   16 May 24 07:24:08   

   3k   

   17387   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Experiments on the validity of Relat   

   15 May 24 06:52:00   

   2k   

   17386   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Experiments on the validity of Relativit   

   13 May 24 06:58:16   

   2k   

   17385   

   =?iso-8859-1?q?P=E1sztor_Borb=E9ly_ to Volney   

   Re: Theoretical Force carrying bosons   

   02 May 24 07:27:39   

   1k   

   17384   

   Volney to All   

   Re: Theoretical Force carrying bosons   

   02 May 24 20:12:19   

   1k   

   17383   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   09 Apr 24 11:42:17   

   1,395b   

   17382   

   wugi to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   09 Apr 24 07:00:40   

   1k   

   17381   

   wugi to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   05 Apr 24 04:24:16   

   2k   

   17380   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   08 Apr 24 06:54:36   

   1k   

   17379   

   Volney to All   

   Theoretical Force carrying bosons   

   05 Apr 24 07:00:41   

   2k   

   17378   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Gravitational mass and inertial mass   

   03 Apr 24 06:58:33   

   2,085b   

   17377   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   25 Mar 24 13:04:43   

   2k   

   17376   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Free fall   

   25 Mar 24 08:14:06   

   2,096b   

   17375   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   25 Mar 24 08:14:06   

   2,096b   

   17374   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   24 Mar 24 08:41:44   

   2,096b   

   17373   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   21 Mar 24 23:13:41   

   4k   

   17372   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Free fall   

   17 Mar 24 13:49:22   

   3k   

   17371   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Free fall   

   15 Mar 24 12:21:00   

   3,299b   

   17370   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   15 Mar 24 01:11:39   

   1k   

   17369   

   D. Goncz to All   

   A little finite math... And an invitatio   

   09 Mar 24 13:44:15   

   5k   

   17368   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Gravitational force and gravitationa   

   07 Mar 24 12:23:21   

   1k   

   17367   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Gravitational force and gravitationa   

   19 Feb 24 00:32:13   

   1k   

   17366   

   Robert Winn to All   

   Time   

   12 Feb 24 22:55:16   

   6k   

   17365   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Gravitational force and gravitational ac   

   15 Feb 24 12:31:18   

   1k   

   17364   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   11 Feb 24 08:54:07   

   1,052b   

   17363   

   Robert Winn to All   

   Galilean explanation of time   

   10 Feb 24 10:09:25   

   5k   

   17362   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   06 Feb 24 12:21:12   

   2k   

   17361   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Free fall   

   06 Feb 24 14:26:36   

   2k   

   17360   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Free fall   

   06 Feb 24 08:26:51   

   1k   

   17359   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   05 Feb 24 08:10:44   

   1,139b   

   17358   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   02 Feb 24 11:39:55   

   2k   

   17357   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   01 Feb 24 08:44:37   

   1k   

   17356   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Free fall   

   31 Jan 24 07:59:59   

   1,493b   

   17355   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   30 Jan 24 08:27:37   

   1,493b   

   17354   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Inclined plane   

   29 Jan 24 10:39:50   

   1,493b   

   17353   

   D. Goncz to All   

   Are toroidal coordinates orthogonal and    

   29 Jan 24 03:11:13   

   2k   

   17352   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   29 Jan 24 08:20:10   

   1,960b   

   17351   

   Stefan Ram to Mod.   

   Re: Fast pennies   

   27 Jan 24 16:08:15   

   2k   

   17350   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Free fall   

   27 Jan 24 16:23:06   

   2k   

   17349   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Free fall   

   26 Jan 24 08:18:39   

   2k   

   17348   

   Mikko to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   26 Jan 24 02:03:16   

   1k   

   17347   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   25 Jan 24 08:32:21   

   1k   

   17346   

   Douglas Dana Edward^2 Parker-Goncz to All   

   Re: Transpoloidal field   

   23 Jan 24 19:39:05   

   1k   

   17345   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Free fall   

   23 Jan 24 19:46:45   

   1k   

   17344   

   Mikko to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Free fall   

   21 Jan 24 13:42:49   

   1,153b   

   17343   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Free fall   

   21 Jan 24 09:04:19   

   1,153b   

   17342   

   wugi to All   

   Re: Fast pennies   

   19 Jan 24 18:34:13   

   1k   

   17341   

   Richard Livingston to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Fast pennies   

   18 Jan 24 13:02:21   

   1,392b   

   17340   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   Fast pennies   

   15 Jan 24 13:10:10   

   1k   

   17339   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   10 Jan 24 23:24:08   

   3k   

   17338   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   04 Jan 24 23:49:56   

   2k   

   17337   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   03 Jan 24 10:49:09   

   2k   

   17336   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   02 Jan 24 08:17:26   

   2k   

   17335   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   01 Jan 24 00:18:12   

   2k   

   17334   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Gravity and curvature   

   25 Dec 23 01:34:09   

   2k   

   17333   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Gravity and curvature   

   25 Dec 23 01:30:57   

   2k   

   17332   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Gravity and curvature   

   25 Dec 23 01:31:07   

   2k   

   17331   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Gravity and curvature   

   17 Dec 23 16:29:50   

   2k   

   17330   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Gravity and curvature   

   21 Dec 23 08:19:38   

   4k   

   17329   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Gravity and curvature   

   20 Dec 23 22:53:58   

   3,901b   

   17328   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Gravity and curvature   

   18 Dec 23 16:07:15   

   3k   

   17327   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Gravity and curvature   

   18 Dec 23 08:30:20   

   3k   

   17326   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   11 Dec 23 12:26:40   

   1k   

   17325   

   Hendrik van Hees to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   11 Dec 23 13:33:03   

   3k   

   17324   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The second law   

   07 Dec 23 09:34:48   

   2,914b   

   17323   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   10 Dec 23 10:52:28   

   2,914b   

   17322   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   04 Nov 23 23:22:58   

   2k   

   17321   

   George Hrabovsky to All   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   02 Nov 23 06:08:07   

   4k   

   17320   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   01 Nov 23 07:59:12   

   3,587b   

   17319   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   01 Nov 23 14:33:38   

   1k   

   17318   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   30 Oct 23 00:35:59   

   2k   

   17317   

   Richard Livingston to All   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   29 Oct 23 10:42:09   

   1,693b   

   17316   

   George Hrabovsky to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   29 Oct 23 10:51:56   

   2k   

   17315   

   George Hrabovsky to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   29 Oct 23 10:41:59   

   1,768b   

   17314   

   George Hrabovsky to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   29 Oct 23 10:24:08   

   1,768b   

   17313   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   29 Oct 23 00:40:52   

   1k   

   17312   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   28 Oct 23 11:02:10   

   1,053b   

   17311   

   George Hrabovsky to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is inertia a vector?   

   26 Oct 23 16:12:16   

   1,053b   

   17310   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Inertia   

   16 Oct 23 19:50:58   

   1,053b   

   17309   

   Julio Di Egidio to All   

   Dis-relativity theory   

   14 Oct 23 15:16:09   

   1,053b   

   17308   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Twin watches   

   26 Sep 23 07:36:47   

   2k   

   17307   

   Mike Fontenot to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Twin watches   

   26 Sep 23 07:36:47   

   1k   

   17306   

   Richard Livingston to Stefan Ram   

   Re: QFT videos   

   25 Sep 23 15:42:00   

   3k   

   17305   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Twin watches   

   25 Sep 23 15:46:36   

   2k   

   17304   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   QFT videos   

   23 Sep 23 14:08:36   

   2k   

   17303   

   Luigi Fortunati to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: Twin watches   

   23 Sep 23 14:09:27   

   2,307b   

   17302   

   D. Goncz to All   

   Novel Indexed Units   

   22 Sep 23 02:22:57   

   2k   

   17301   

   Yanick Toutain to All   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   21 Sep 23 13:01:11   

   2k   

   17300   

   Yanick Toutain to All   

   Gravitation and quanta by Jacques Solomo   

   20 Sep 23 19:24:08   

   1k   

   17299   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: Twin watches   

   19 Sep 23 07:12:29   

   1,394b   

   17298   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   17 Sep 23 01:27:03   

   2k   

   17297   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   17 Sep 23 01:26:17   

   1k   

   17296   

   Edward Prochak to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   13 Sep 23 07:03:51   

   1,157b   

   17295   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   10 Sep 23 01:30:07   

   3k   

   17294   

   wugi to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   10 Sep 23 13:37:40   

   2k   

   17293   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   12 Sep 23 06:59:20   

   1,957b   

   17292   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   06 Sep 23 22:52:40   

   1k   

   17291   

   wugi to All   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   07 Sep 23 11:03:57   

   2k   

   17290   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The SR between reality and appearanc   

   05 Sep 23 11:01:20   

   1k   

   17289   

   William to Pat Dolan   

   Re: The Big Ben Paradox   

   05 Sep 23 11:02:33   

   4k   

   17288   

   Tom Roberts to Pat Dolan   

   Re: The Big Ben Paradox   

   04 Sep 23 07:11:37   

   3k   

   17287   

   Stefan Ram to Pat Dolan   

   Re: The Big Ben Paradox   

   02 Sep 23 11:54:34   

   1k   

   17286   

   Pat Dolan to All   

   The Big Ben Paradox   

   02 Sep 23 08:32:05   

   1k   

   17285   

   wugi to All   

   Re: Synchronization   

   01 Sep 23 07:34:46   

   1,263b   

   17284   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Synchronization   

   26 Aug 23 11:39:13   

   2k   

   17283   

   Richard Livingston to stargene   

   Re: JWST's surprising galaxies and Big G   

   21 Aug 23 13:43:32   

   1k   

   17282   

   stargene to All   

   JWST's surprising galaxies and Big G   

   20 Aug 23 21:38:36   

   1,062b   

   17281   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Synchronization   

   15 Aug 23 07:14:29   

   1,062b   

   17280   

   Richard Livingston to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Waves moving in a lecture   

   10 Aug 23 12:33:19   

   1k   

   17279   

   Stefan Ram to Then he   

   Waves moving in a lecture   

   02 Aug 23 10:11:06   

   1k   

   17278   

   Julio Di Egidio to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   28 Jul 23 13:52:58   

   2k   

   17277   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   26 Jul 23 07:29:53   

   1k   

   17276   

   Tom Roberts to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   25 Jul 23 00:24:59   

   3k   

   17275   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   25 Jul 23 00:38:01   

   3k   

   17274   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   24 Jul 23 09:54:27   

   2k   

   17273   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   24 Jul 23 09:52:45   

   3k   

   17272   

   Julio Di Egidio to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   24 Jul 23 15:22:56   

   1k   

   17271   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   24 Jul 23 00:06:18   

   2k   

   17270   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   23 Jul 23 09:59:52   

   1k   

   17269   

   wugi to All   

   SRT interactive   

   20 Jul 23 11:45:20   

   1k   

   17268   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   19 Jul 23 07:07:22   

   3k   

   17267   

   Stefan Ram to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   18 Jul 23 13:25:04   

   3,099b   

   17266   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   18 Jul 23 12:12:16   

   2k   

   17265   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   18 Jul 23 07:28:20   

   4k   

   17264   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   18 Jul 23 07:28:20   

   2k   

   17263   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   17 Jul 23 09:38:45   

   1k   

   17262   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   17 Jul 23 11:59:00   

   4k   

   17261   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   16 Jul 23 07:58:01   

   1k   

   17260   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The Twins and the Earth's Rotation   

   14 Jul 23 23:27:02   

   1k   

   17259   

   Stefan Ram to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Symmetries   

   11 Jul 23 10:56:07   

   2k   

   17258   

   Thomas Koenig to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Symmetries   

   09 Jul 23 00:39:26   

   1k   

   17257   

   Stefan Ram to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Symmetries   

   08 Jul 23 21:35:56   

   1k   

   17256   

   Stefan Ram to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Symmetries   

   27 Jun 23 12:20:09   

   1,347b   

   17255   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Length contraction   

   27 Jun 23 12:20:24   

   1,347b   

   17254   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   Symmetries   

   24 Jun 23 13:37:05   

   1k   

   17253   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Length contraction   

   21 Jun 23 09:08:17   

   1,306b   

   17252   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Length contraction   

   07 Jun 23 09:52:01   

   1,306b   

   17251   

   Corey White to All   

   Gravity (1/2)   

   01 Jun 23 07:14:35   

   7k   

   17250   

   Richard Livingston to Corey White   

   Re: Gravity   

   01 Jun 23 14:23:51   

   2k   

   17249   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Length contraction   

   28 May 23 23:55:12   

   1,582b   

   17248   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Length contraction   

   22 May 23 10:16:03   

   1,582b   

   17247   

   Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 to All   

   Superelliptical Architectural Foundation   

   22 May 23 10:15:40   

   1,582b   

   17246   

   Steven Carlip to Richard Livingston   

   Re: Planetary Aberration   

   19 May 23 08:04:11   

   1,582b   

   17245   

   Tom Roberts to Richard Livingston   

   Re: Planetary Aberration   

   18 May 23 13:20:49   

   2k   

   17244   

   Richard Livingston to All   

   Planetary Aberration   

   16 May 23 07:24:00   

   2k   

   17243   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Is the free-falling elevator an iner   

   04 May 23 08:23:52   

   1,730b   

   17242   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is the free-falling elevator an iner   

   03 May 23 06:57:45   

   2k   

   17241   

   Rock Brentwood to All   

   Re: Faraday's Law and the Maxwell Equati   

   30 Apr 23 12:47:53   

   7k   

   17240   

   Rock Brentwood to All   

   Re: Parallel Fourier Gradient   

   30 Apr 23 12:46:47   

   2k   

   17239   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The elevator in zero gravity   

   18 Apr 23 23:49:41   

   1,968b   

   17238   

   Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 to All   

   Parallel Fourier Gradient   

   15 Apr 23 23:35:36   

   2k   

   17237   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The internal force   

   04 Apr 23 11:39:23   

   2k   

   17236   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The internal force   

   30 Mar 23 20:59:01   

   2,223b   

   17235   

   Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 to All   

   Homopolar Motor 2   

   23 Mar 23 23:59:01   

   7k   

   17234   

   israel socratus to All   

   Re: The force of gravity   

   21 Mar 23 23:59:41   

   6,932b   

   17233   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Existence of "apparent" force   

   17 Mar 23 16:17:53   

   3k   

   17232   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Existence of "apparent" force   

   13 Mar 23 11:34:17   

   2k   

   17231   

   Guido Wugi to All   

   Re: Existence of "apparent" force   

   16 Mar 23 21:04:10   

   2k   

   17230   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Existence of "apparent" force   

   17 Mar 23 06:13:23   

   1k   

   17229   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Two questions about force   

   23 Feb 23 13:41:21   

   1,038b   

   17228   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Two questions about force   

   22 Feb 23 14:26:53   

   1,038b   

   17227   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Two questions about force   

   22 Feb 23 14:31:18   

   3k   

   17226   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Two questions about force   

   22 Feb 23 08:10:09   

   2k   

   17225   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Two questions about force   

   21 Feb 23 07:59:19   

   1,718b   

   17224   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Two questions about force   

   20 Feb 23 09:09:08   

   2k   

   17223   

   amal banerjee to All   

   Pseudopotential k vector selection for s   

   20 Feb 23 07:57:56   

   1k   

   17222   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Two questions about force   

   19 Feb 23 15:01:21   

   2k   

   17221   

   George Hrabovsky to Stefan Ram   

   Re: How do things get into black holes?   

   18 Feb 23 00:49:14   

   2k   

   17220   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Two questions about force   

   18 Feb 23 00:37:48   

   1k   

   17219   

   Sylvia Else to Richard Livingston   

   Re: Chat GPT =&D Example Verbatim   

   16 Feb 23 22:30:10   

   2k   

   17218   

   Douglas Dana Edward^2 Parker-Goncz to All   

   Re: Chat GPT =&D Example Verbatim   

   16 Feb 23 11:43:44   

   2k   

   17217   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   Re: How do things get into black holes?   

   15 Feb 23 13:47:34   

   2,446b   

   17216   

   Douglas Dana Edward^2 Parker-Goncz to richali...@gmail.com   

   Re: Chat GPT =&D Example Verbatim   

   12 Feb 23 13:00:13   

   1k   

   17215   

   Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 to All   

   Symmetric Cylindrical Coordinates (2/2)   

   12 Feb 23 13:02:01   

   1,248b   

   17214   

   Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 to All   

   Symmetric Cylindrical Coordinates (1/2)   

   12 Feb 23 13:02:01   

   7k   

   17213   

   John L. to All   

   How do things get into black holes?   

   12 Feb 23 14:06:26   

   2k   

   17212   

   Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 to All   

   Chat GPT =&D Example Verbatim (1/3)   

   01 Feb 23 00:53:36   

   7k   

   17211   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   Bra vectors in Ballentine   

   30 Jan 23 08:46:41   

   2k   

   17210   

   Richard Livingston to All   

   Re: Chat GPT =&D Example Verbatim   

   02 Feb 23 08:52:01   

   1,897b   

   17209   

   Rock Brentwood to All   

   A non-perturbative perturbation theory?   

   28 Jan 23 22:38:56   

   1,897b   

   17208   

   Rock Brentwood to fortuna   

   Re: Relativity of simultaneity   

   28 Jan 23 22:39:18   

   1k   

   17207   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The direction of the precession   

   16 Jan 23 10:03:53   

   1,346b   

   17206   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   14 Jan 23 00:15:52   

   2k   

   17205   

   Hendrik van Hees to All   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   12 Jan 23 13:16:59   

   6k   

   17204   

   Edward Prochak to All   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   12 Jan 23 08:23:18   

   4k   

   17203   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   12 Jan 23 08:23:17   

   4k   

   17202   

   wugi to All   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   12 Jan 23 08:23:17   

   3k   

   17201   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   11 Jan 23 10:58:51   

   3k   

   17200   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Alan Folmsbee   

   Re: Oxygen double helix images, in theor   

   11 Jan 23 10:58:34   

   2k   

   17199   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   11 Jan 23 08:32:14   

   3k   

   17198   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Relativity of simultaneity   

   06 Jan 23 09:21:34   

   3,076b   

   17197   

   Richard Livingston to All   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   03 Jan 23 17:09:38   

   3,076b   

   17196   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Richard Livingston   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   02 Jan 23 11:02:26   

   1k   

   17195   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   02 Jan 23 08:37:34   

   1k   

   17194   

   Stefan Ram to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   01 Jan 23 21:56:59   

   2k   

   17193   

   Richard Livingston to All   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   02 Jan 23 08:37:34   

   2k   

   17192   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   31 Dec 22 12:08:23   

   1,884b   

   17191   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Apparent rotation   

   30 Dec 22 08:45:53   

   1k   

   17190   

   Hendrik van Hees to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: Centrifugal force (simulation)   

   25 Dec 22 10:00:02   

   3k   

   17189   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Centrifugal force (simulation)   

   25 Dec 22 08:55:08   

   1k   

   17188   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to hitlong@yahoo.com   

   Re: Back to the drawing board   

   25 Dec 22 08:55:38   

   6k   

   17187   

   Julio Di Egidio to Hendrik van Hees   

   Re: Centrifugal force (simulation)   

   24 Dec 22 22:34:14   

   2k   

   17186   

   Gary Harnagel to All   

   Re: Back to the drawing board   

   25 Dec 22 07:29:47   

   2k   

   17185   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The force of gravity   

   22 Dec 22 10:29:02   

   2k   

   17184   

   Thomas Koenig to Sylvia Else   

   Re: Cheating your way out of the Second    

   22 Dec 22 10:29:02   

   2,351b   

   17183   

   Stefan Ram to Sylvia Else   

   Re: Cheating your way out of the Second    

   21 Dec 22 23:21:48   

   1k   

   17182   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Rock Brentwood   

   Re: Cheating your way out of the Second    

   21 Dec 22 12:56:36   

   1k   

   17181   

   Sylvia Else to Rock Brentwood   

   Re: Cheating your way out of the Second    

   21 Dec 22 12:57:04   

   1,164b   

   17180   

   Thomas Koenig to Rock Brentwood   

   Re: Cheating your way out of the Second    

   21 Dec 22 12:56:53   

   1k   

   17179   

   Rock Brentwood to All   

   Cheating your way out of the Second Law    

   20 Dec 22 12:54:52   

   1,103b   

   17178   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The force of gravity   

   18 Dec 22 23:58:20   

   2k   

   17177   

   Douglas Goncz A.A.S. M.E.T. 1990 to All   

   Re: Negligible Warming--NOT!   

   11 Dec 22 11:43:30   

   3k   

   17176   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to .std.spaamtrap.com   

   Re: "Three billiard balls collide simult   

   08 Dec 22 23:23:43   

   1k   

   17175   

   Michael Moroney to All   

   Re: "Three billiard balls collide simult   

   07 Dec 22 13:36:56   

   1,384b   

   17174   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Carl K   

   Re: "Three billiard balls collide simult   

   29 Nov 22 23:19:00   

   1k   

   17173   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: F=ma   

   24 Nov 22 21:32:03   

   1,485b   

   17172   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: F=ma   

   26 Nov 22 13:05:52   

   1,485b   

   17171   

   mark horn to All   

   Life at equilibrium   

   21 Nov 22 15:41:58   

   1,485b   

   17170   

   mark horn to All   

   Re: Life at equilibrium   

   23 Nov 22 12:39:17   

   1k   

   17169   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to mark horn   

   Re: Life at equilibrium   

   22 Nov 22 08:23:09   

   1,168b   

   17168   

   Tom Roberts to Richard Livingston   

   Re: Neptune   

   18 Nov 22 18:14:08   

   1k   

   17167   

   Sylvia Else to Sylvia Else   

   Re: Tidal forces   

   18 Nov 22 08:28:19   

   1,319b   

   17166   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Tidal forces   

   18 Nov 22 08:28:19   

   1k   

   17165   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Tidal forces   

   17 Nov 22 18:21:02   

   1,323b   

   17164   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to All   

   Re: Neptune   

   17 Nov 22 21:54:43   

   2k   

   17163   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to Phillip Helbig   

   Re: Neptune   

   17 Nov 22 09:04:44   

   2k   

   17162   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Tidal forces   

   17 Nov 22 10:01:53   

   1,635b   

   17161   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Spring in free fall   

   15 Nov 22 12:17:21   

   1,635b   

   17160   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Neptune   

   15 Nov 22 12:17:21   

   1,635b   

   17159   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   13 Nov 22 10:10:04   

   1,635b   

   17158   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Two trolleys on the rail   

   13 Nov 22 10:10:34   

   2k   

   17157   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   07 Nov 22 10:57:05   

   1k   

   17156   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The center of gravity   

   07 Nov 22 10:55:03   

   2k   

   17155   

   Edward Prochak to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The center of gravity   

   07 Nov 22 08:14:59   

   2k   

   17154   

   xray4abc to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The center of gravity   

   04 Nov 22 08:23:14   

   2k   

   17153   

   xray4abc to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   03 Nov 22 08:39:33   

   2k   

   17152   

   Giorgio Pastore to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   02 Nov 22 07:08:28   

   3k   

   17151   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The center of gravity   

   02 Nov 22 08:03:38   

   2,938b   

   17150   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   02 Nov 22 08:04:48   

   2k   

   17149   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The center of gravity   

   01 Nov 22 22:33:27   

   2,468b   

   17148   

   Austin Fearnley to All   

   Re: Nobel price physics 2022.   

   01 Nov 22 12:04:25   

   2k   

   17147   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The center of gravity   

   01 Nov 22 08:32:39   

   3k   

   17146   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to sylvia@email.invalid   

   Re: Nobel price physics 2022.   

   31 Oct 22 17:08:31   

   3k   

   17145   

   xray4abc to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   01 Nov 22 00:44:13   

   2k   

   17144   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The center of gravity   

   01 Nov 22 00:46:21   

   2k   

   17143   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   31 Oct 22 18:02:46   

   3k   

   17142   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: The center of gravity   

   31 Oct 22 18:02:13   

   1k   

   17141   

   aristo dorticos to aristo dorticos   

   Re: Is this paper correct?   

   30 Oct 22 18:05:42   

   1,153b   

   17140   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The center of gravity   

   29 Oct 22 13:17:53   

   1,153b   

   17139   

   Stefan Ram to Austin Fearnley   

   Re: Nobel price physics 2022.   

   18 Oct 22 12:00:33   

   1,153b   

   17138   

   Austin Fearnley to All   

   Re: Nobel price physics 2022.   

   18 Oct 22 07:30:32   

   2k   

   17137   

   Richard Livingston to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Nobel price physics 2022.   

   17 Oct 22 15:20:27   

   2k   

   17136   

   Tom Roberts to Richard Livingston   

   Re: Nobel price physics 2022.   

   17 Oct 22 07:10:35   

   1k   

   17135   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color t to All   

   Re: The second principle and inertia   

   16 Oct 22 23:11:57   

   2k   

   17134   

   Julio Di Egidio to nicolaa...@pandora.be   

   Re: Nobel price physics 2022.   

   16 Oct 22 23:11:27   

   2,367b   

   17133   

   Richard Livingston to Austin Fearnley   

   Re: Nobel price physics 2022.   

   16 Oct 22 13:09:01   

   2k   

   17132   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The second principle and inertia   

   13 Oct 22 12:59:22   

   1,718b   

   17131   

   Austin Fearnley to All   

   Re: Nobel price physics 2022.   

   13 Oct 22 12:59:03   

   2k   

   17130   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The second principle and inertia   

   11 Oct 22 22:33:09   

   1,736b   

   17129   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The second principle and inertia   

   11 Oct 22 12:46:30   

   1,736b   

   17128   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The second principle and inertia   

   11 Oct 22 14:04:20   

   1,736b   

   17127   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The second principle and inertia   

   11 Oct 22 07:23:54   

   1,736b   

   17126   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The second principle and inertia   

   10 Oct 22 10:21:46   

   1,736b   

   17125   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The second principle and inertia   

   09 Oct 22 21:13:47   

   1,736b   

   17124   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The second principle and inertia   

   09 Oct 22 15:35:01   

   1,736b   

   17123   

   Richard Livingston to Rock Brentwood   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   07 Oct 22 17:08:41   

   1k   

   17122   

   Rock Brentwood to rich...   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   07 Oct 22 09:17:25   

   1,119b   

   17121   

   Rock Brentwood to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   07 Oct 22 09:16:55   

   3k   

   17120   

   Richard Livingston to Robert Komar   

   Re: Two bodies in remote space   

   03 Oct 22 21:20:04   

   2k   

   17119   

   Julio Di Egidio to All   

   Re: Hossenfelder on particle physics   

   03 Oct 22 21:19:34   

   1k   

   17118   

   Robert Komar to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Two bodies in remote space   

   02 Oct 22 12:51:00   

   1,310b   

   17117   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Two bodies in remote space   

   30 Sep 22 18:02:18   

   2k   

   17116   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Two bodies in remote space   

   30 Sep 22 10:29:32   

   1,738b   

   17115   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Two bodies in remote space   

   29 Sep 22 16:44:00   

   1,738b   

   17114   

   Julio Di Egidio to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Two bodies in remote space   

   29 Sep 22 12:28:58   

   1k   

   17113   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Two bodies in remote space   

   28 Sep 22 23:16:37   

   1,484b   

   17112   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   Angle bisection   

   24 Sep 22 13:11:14   

   2k   

   17111   

   mano4848 to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   22 Sep 22 08:18:17   

   2k   

   17110   

   Tom Roberts to Bruchpilot Aki   

   Re: Photons and the cosmic redshift   

   19 Sep 22 22:26:12   

   2k   

   17109   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   15 Sep 22 16:12:38   

   2k   

   17108   

   Stefan Ram to Bruchpilot Aki   

   Re: Photons and the cosmic redshift   

   14 Sep 22 11:51:11   

   1k   

   17107   

   Bruchpilot Aki to All   

   Photons and the cosmic redshift   

   14 Sep 22 06:19:53   

   1,333b   

   17106   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   13 Sep 22 12:03:36   

   2k   

   17105   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   12 Sep 22 12:36:11   

   2k   

   17104   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   12 Sep 22 12:30:42   

   1,977b   

   17103   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   12 Sep 22 17:02:04   

   3k   

   17102   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   11 Sep 22 16:38:28   

   2k   

   17101   

   Julio Di Egidio to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   10 Sep 22 09:39:21   

   2k   

   17100   

   Tom Roberts to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   10 Sep 22 08:51:43   

   1k   

   17099   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   09 Sep 22 13:30:53   

   3k   

   17098   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   09 Sep 22 13:30:00   

   3,343b   

   17097   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   09 Sep 22 08:19:15   

   4k   

   17096   

   Richard Livingston to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   08 Sep 22 15:37:07   

   2k   

   17095   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   08 Sep 22 15:35:59   

   2,064b   

   17094   

   Tom Roberts to Richard Livingston   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   08 Sep 22 09:13:23   

   2,064b   

   17093   

   Julio Di Egidio to richali...@gmail.com   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   08 Sep 22 09:13:22   

   4k   

   17092   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   07 Sep 22 20:41:17   

   1k   

   17091   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   07 Sep 22 20:43:50   

   2k   

   17090   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The Direction of geodesics   

   07 Sep 22 10:12:12   

   1k   

   17089   

   Richard Livingston to ju...@diegidio.name   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   07 Sep 22 12:35:46   

   3k   

   17088   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The Direction of geodesics   

   07 Sep 22 06:22:42   

   3,005b   

   17087   

   berk berk to All   

   AN_ADVANDED_MATHEMATICAL_SOLVER_APPLICAT   

   04 Sep 22 22:06:56   

   3,005b   

   17086   

   stargene to All   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   04 Sep 22 22:05:29   

   1k   

   17085   

   Julio Di Egidio to richali...@gmail.com   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   04 Sep 22 22:03:06   

   2k   

   17084   

   Richard Livingston to ju...@diegidio.name   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   04 Sep 22 10:54:24   

   3k   

   17083   

   Julio Di Egidio to Thomas Koenig   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   03 Sep 22 17:15:33   

   1k   

   17082   

   Thomas Koenig to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   03 Sep 22 14:50:00   

   1,408b   

   17081   

   Stefan Ram to Richard Livingston   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   03 Sep 22 14:49:30   

   2k   

   17080   

   Julio Di Egidio to richali...@gmail.com   

   Re: Conservation of Information in QM   

   02 Sep 22 23:34:42   

   2k   

   17079   

   Richard Livingston to All   

   Conservation of Information in QM   

   01 Sep 22 17:30:55   

   2,418b   

   17078   

   Julio Di Egidio to All   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Q_on_Mach=E2=80=94Einstein_Pri   

   30 Aug 22 23:33:06   

   2,418b   

   17077   

   Julio Di Egidio to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Relativity of simultaneity   

   03 Aug 22 22:48:56   

   2k   

   17076   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Relativity of simultaneity   

   03 Aug 22 14:44:22   

   2k   

   17075   

   Richard Livingston to Jen   

   Re: pressure variations   

   03 Aug 22 17:26:45   

   2k   

   17074   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Relativity of simultaneity   

   03 Aug 22 10:02:06   

   1k   

   17073   

   Uno Qualunque to All   

   pressure variations   

   03 Aug 22 06:29:30   

   1,315b   

   17072   

   J. J. Lodder to Richard Livingston   

   Re: Is there a universal time?   

   28 Jul 22 13:46:11   

   5k   

   17071   

   J. J. Lodder to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   25 Jul 22 10:06:52   

   4,644b   

   17070   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   25 Jul 22 07:01:17   

   4,644b   

   17069   

   Julio Di Egidio to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   25 Jul 22 06:44:51   

   2k   

   17068   

   Julio Di Egidio to Richard D. Saam   

   Re: Is there a universal time?   

   24 Jul 22 12:36:21   

   2k   

   17067   

   Thomas Koenig to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   23 Jul 22 09:49:16   

   2,069b   

   17066   

   Tom Roberts to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   23 Jul 22 09:49:15   

   1k   

   17065   

   Julio Di Egidio to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   22 Jul 22 17:39:54   

   2k   

   17064   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   21 Jul 22 11:17:22   

   2,128b   

   17063   

   Richard Livingston to Richard D. Saam   

   Re: Is there a universal time?   

   21 Jul 22 10:16:56   

   2k   

   17062   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   19 Jul 22 09:18:39   

   1k   

   17061   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   18 Jul 22 12:14:33   

   1,271b   

   17060   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   18 Jul 22 09:50:26   

   1,271b   

   17059   

   Julio Di Egidio to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   18 Jul 22 06:38:57   

   1k   

   17058   

   Tom Roberts to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   17 Jul 22 06:54:37   

   1k   

   17057   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   17 Jul 22 06:54:06   

   1,423b   

   17056   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   15 Jul 22 16:11:21   

   2k   

   17055   

   Julio Di Egidio to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   15 Jul 22 16:11:11   

   2k   

   17054   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   15 Jul 22 15:44:52   

   1k   

   17053   

   J. J. Lodder to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   14 Jul 22 14:58:42   

   3k   

   17052   

   J. J. Lodder to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Centripetal and centrifugal force   

   14 Jul 22 12:12:14   

   1k   

   17051   

   Julio Di Egidio to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   14 Jul 22 05:29:41   

   1k   

   17050   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton's bucket   

   13 Jul 22 20:13:24   

   1,287b   

   17049   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Newton's bucket   

   13 Jul 22 09:50:37   

   1,287b   

   17048   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Centripetal and centrifugal force   

   08 Jul 22 08:22:20   

   1,287b   

   17047   

   Richard Livingston to Sylvia Else   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   20 Jun 22 14:51:49   

   2k   

   17046   

   Sylvia Else to Richard Livingston   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   20 Jun 22 09:05:26   

   2k   

   17045   

   Richard Livingston to Sylvia Else   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   19 Jun 22 14:50:30   

   1k   

   17044   

   Sylvia Else to Richard Livingston   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   16 Jun 22 08:27:52   

   1,374b   

   17043   

   Tom Roberts to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   16 Jun 22 08:27:21   

   3k   

   17042   

   Richard Livingston to Tom Roberts   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   16 Jun 22 08:26:51   

   2k   

   17041   

   Julio Di Egidio to Tom Roberts   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   15 Jun 22 07:18:07   

   2k   

   17040   

   Richard Livingston to Sylvia Else   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   14 Jun 22 20:56:46   

   2k   

   17039   

   Tom Roberts to Richard Livingston   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   14 Jun 22 15:15:14   

   1k   

   17038   

   Richard Livingston to Chris Jacobs   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   13 Jun 22 08:43:10   

   1,041b   

   17037   

   Julio Di Egidio to Chris Jacobs   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   13 Jun 22 13:28:21   

   1k   

   17036   

   Sylvia Else to Chris Jacobs   

   Re: quantum teleportation and time rever   

   13 Jun 22 12:39:11   

   1k   

   17035   

   Chris Jacobs to All   

   quantum teleportation and time reversal   

   12 Jun 22 20:28:50   

   1,342b   

   17034   

   J. J. Lodder to Tom Roberts   

   Time in accelerated reference frames   

   08 Jun 22 21:51:11   

   3k   

   17033   

   J. J. Lodder to Luigi Fortunati   

   Can acceleration be measured with a watc   

   08 Jun 22 21:50:41   

   2k   

   17032   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Time in accelerated reference frames   

   01 Jun 22 18:33:47   

   1k   

   17031   

   J. J. Lodder to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Time in accelerated reference frames   

   31 May 22 10:48:48   

   1,513b   

   17030   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Time in accelerated reference frames   

   31 May 22 07:54:31   

   1,513b   

   17029   

   Richard Livingston to Lou   

   Re: Question on Energy of emr from a ran   

   30 May 22 11:41:10   

   1k   

   17028   

   Lou to All   

   Question on Energy of emr from a range o   

   30 May 22 10:06:42   

   1,446b   

   17027   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Can acceleration be measured with a    

   28 May 22 18:50:12   

   2k   

   17026   

   J. J. Lodder to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Can acceleration be measured with a    

   26 May 22 22:23:18   

   1k   

   17025   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Can acceleration be measured with a    

   26 May 22 17:47:45   

   3k   

   17024   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Can acceleration be measured with a    

   26 May 22 09:56:55   

   3,537b   

   17023   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Can acceleration be measured with a    

   24 May 22 16:05:03   

   3,537b   

   17022   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Can acceleration be measured with a watc   

   23 May 22 09:46:19   

   3,537b   

   17021   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Gravity acts on two masses   

   23 May 22 09:45:49   

   3,537b   

   17020   

   Tom Roberts to Lou   

   Re: Inertial frame   

   20 May 22 15:15:32   

   1k   

   17019   

   Lou to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Inertial frame   

   20 May 22 12:44:11   

   3k   

   17018   

   Rock Brentwood to All   

   Re: problems with arXiv   

   16 May 22 23:46:01   

   2k   

   17017   

   Rock Brentwood to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Inertial frame   

   16 May 22 23:45:31   

   5k   

   17016   

   Tom Roberts to Julio Di Egidio   

   Re: Inertial frame   

   15 May 22 11:10:42   

   2k   

   17015   

   Julio Di Egidio to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Inertial frame   

   08 May 22 17:38:46   

   1k   

   17014   

   Julio Di Egidio to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Inertial frame   

   08 May 22 14:21:21   

   2k   

   17013   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   08 May 22 07:41:36   

   2k   

   17012   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Inertial frame   

   08 May 22 07:41:36   

   1,586b   

   17011   

   Julio Di Egidio to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Inertial frame   

   07 May 22 13:00:52   

   1k   

   17010   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Inertial frame   

   07 May 22 10:38:37   

   1,214b   

   17009   

   amal banerjee to All   

   Looking for books on heterogeneous junct   

   07 May 22 09:18:19   

   1,214b   

   17008   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   06 May 22 17:22:08   

   2k   

   17007   

   Richard D. Saam to All   

   Superconductor Theory   

   05 May 22 21:05:51   

   1k   

   17006   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   05 May 22 21:05:20   

   3k   

   17005   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   05 May 22 07:26:49   

   2,589b   

   17004   

   Mike Fontenot to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   04 May 22 12:11:51   

   2,589b   

   17003   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   03 May 22 09:17:57   

   2,589b   

   17002   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   03 May 22 07:58:37   

   2,589b   

   17001   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   02 May 22 15:24:10   

   3k   

   17000   

   Richard Livingston to All   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   02 May 22 09:36:50   

   2,715b   

   16999   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   02 May 22 09:36:20   

   3k   

   16998   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   01 May 22 09:45:23   

   3,233b   

   16997   

   Luigi Fortunati to As Richard Livingston   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   29 Apr 22 00:59:24   

   3k   

   16996   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   28 Apr 22 07:05:51   

   1k   

   16995   

   mike jurney to All   

   Cosmic event horizon entropy to the entr   

   26 Apr 22 20:22:21   

   1,393b   

   16994   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   26 Apr 22 20:21:51   

   2k   

   16993   

   J. J. Lodder to Stefan Ram   

   Re: What is a force?   

   25 Apr 22 12:10:44   

   3k   

   16992   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   What is a force?   

   25 Apr 22 00:49:45   

   2k   

   16991   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   25 Apr 22 00:35:51   

   5k   

   16990   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   22 Apr 22 10:39:45   

   2k   

   16989   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   21 Apr 22 07:24:45   

   2,175b   

   16988   

   Stefan Ram to Richard Livingston   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   19 Apr 22 18:58:52   

   2k   

   16987   

   Richard Livingston to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Einstein's elevator   

   19 Apr 22 06:28:38   

   2k   

   16986   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Einstein's elevator   

   19 Apr 22 07:21:40   

   1,998b   

   16985   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   19 Apr 22 07:19:49   

   2k   

   16984   

   Mike Fontenot to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   18 Apr 22 14:17:57   

   2k   

   16983   

   Douglas Eagleson to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Neutrinos and "ultra-worldly particl   

   18 Apr 22 13:54:17   

   1k   

   16982   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   18 Apr 22 15:46:23   

   2k   

   16981   

   Mike Fontenot to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   17 Apr 22 08:03:00   

   1,719b   

   16980   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   15 Apr 22 23:57:20   

   2k   

   16979   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   15 Apr 22 23:57:11   

   3k   

   16978   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   15 Apr 22 16:06:21   

   2,935b   

   16977   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   14 Apr 22 21:25:45   

   3k   

   16976   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   14 Apr 22 21:25:30   

   3k   

   16975   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   14 Apr 22 13:32:50   

   3k   

   16974   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   12 Apr 22 11:28:54   

   5k   

   16973   

   Mike Fontenot to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   12 Apr 22 07:21:19   

   1k   

   16972   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   12 Apr 22 07:21:19   

   3k   

   16971   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   11 Apr 22 12:19:47   

   2k   

   16970   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   11 Apr 22 12:18:50   

   3k   

   16969   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   11 Apr 22 08:00:11   

   2k   

   16968   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   10 Apr 22 11:52:23   

   1k   

   16967   

   Mike Fontenot to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   08 Apr 22 19:03:52   

   5k   

   16966   

   Mike Fontenot to Richard Livingston   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   08 Apr 22 00:05:52   

   6k   

   16965   

   Richard Livingston to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   07 Apr 22 19:02:15   

   5,705b   

   16964   

   Mike Fontenot to Richard Livingston   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   06 Apr 22 21:04:05   

   5,705b   

   16963   

   Richard Livingston to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   06 Apr 22 11:22:40   

   3k   

   16962   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Neutrinos and "ultra-worldly particles"   

   06 Apr 22 11:21:20   

   3,426b   

   16961   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin (1/   

   05 Apr 22 20:54:03   

   7k   

   16960   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   05 Apr 22 20:53:33   

   2k   

   16959   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   03 Apr 22 22:15:19   

   2k   

   16958   

   Tom Roberts to Richard Livingston   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   03 Apr 22 22:15:19   

   4k   

   16957   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   03 Apr 22 22:15:18   

   1k   

   16956   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   03 Apr 22 18:13:48   

   1k   

   16955   

   Mike Fontenot to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   02 Apr 22 10:51:23   

   1,066b   

   16954   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   02 Apr 22 18:36:41   

   3k   

   16953   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   02 Apr 22 06:22:53   

   4k   

   16952   

   Tom Roberts to Richard Livingston   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   02 Apr 22 06:22:52   

   4k   

   16951   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   02 Apr 22 06:22:52   

   2k   

   16950   

   Mike Fontenot to Richard Livingston   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   29 Mar 22 11:19:15   

   3k   

   16949   

   Mike Fontenot to jtmpreno   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   28 Mar 22 10:37:26   

   3,011b   

   16948   

   Richard Livingston to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   28 Mar 22 10:36:55   

   3k   

   16947   

   jtmpreno to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   26 Mar 22 13:31:39   

   4k   

   16946   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   25 Mar 22 10:57:15   

   3k   

   16945   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   21 Mar 22 08:04:51   

   3,469b   

   16944   

   Eric Flesch to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   20 Mar 22 15:22:48   

   3,469b   

   16943   

   Richard Livingston to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   20 Mar 22 11:30:33   

   2k   

   16942   

   Stefan Ram to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   20 Mar 22 10:50:48   

   2,189b   

   16941   

   Richard Livingston to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   20 Mar 22 10:49:12   

   2k   

   16940   

   Mike Fontenot to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   20 Mar 22 10:44:29   

   1k   

   16939   

   Tom Roberts to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   19 Mar 22 11:27:34   

   2k   

   16938   

   Stefan Ram to Richard Livingston   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   18 Mar 22 14:27:16   

   3k   

   16937   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Richard Livingston   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   17 Mar 22 15:26:56   

   2k   

   16936   

   Mike Fontenot to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   17 Mar 22 15:26:10   

   1k   

   16935   

   Richard Livingston to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   17 Mar 22 15:14:51   

   3k   

   16934   

   Mike Fontenot to Richard Livingston   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   16 Mar 22 10:47:04   

   4k   

   16933   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   16 Mar 22 10:46:16   

   3,734b   

   16932   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   16 Mar 22 07:22:52   

   4k   

   16931   

   Mike Fontenot to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The braking of the traveler twin   

   15 Mar 22 18:57:00   

   4k   

   16930   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The braking of the traveler twin   

   14 Mar 22 12:08:08   

   3,748b   

   16929   

   Stefan Ram to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   12 Mar 22 01:12:28   

   2k   

   16928   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Fontenot   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   10 Mar 22 09:21:25   

   2k   

   16927   

   Mike Fontenot to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   10 Mar 22 09:01:07   

   1k   

   16926   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   07 Mar 22 13:09:25   

   2k   

   16925   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   07 Mar 22 12:54:41   

   2k   

   16924   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   05 Mar 22 13:12:51   

   1,544b   

   16923   

   Stefan Ram to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   04 Mar 22 13:53:18   

   1,544b   

   16922   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   04 Mar 22 13:04:32   

   2k   

   16921   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Gravity and free fall   

   04 Mar 22 09:12:00   

   3k   

   16920   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Gravity and free fall   

   04 Mar 22 08:16:58   

   2,610b   

   16919   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Stefan Ram   

   Re: problems with arXiv   

   18 Feb 22 13:26:16   

   4k   

   16918   

   Stefan Ram to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: problems with arXiv   

   18 Feb 22 08:52:21   

   3,983b   

   16917   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Stefan Ram   

   Re: problems with arXiv   

   16 Feb 22 23:42:39   

   3k   

   16916   

   Stefan Ram to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: problems with arXiv   

   16 Feb 22 09:16:13   

   2,656b   

   16915   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: Physics bitten by reverse Alan Sokal   

   08 Jan 22 00:29:02   

   3k   

   16914   

   J. J. Lodder to Rock Brentwood   

   Re: Physics bitten by reverse Alan Sokal   

   07 Jan 22 21:57:59   

   1k   

   16913   

   Jos Bergervoet to Rock Brentwood   

   Re: Physics bitten by reverse Alan Sokal   

   07 Jan 22 08:04:12   

   1,270b   

   16912   

   Rock Brentwood to Rock Brentwood   

   Re: Physics bitten by reverse Alan Sokal   

   05 Jan 22 09:31:39   

   3k   

   16911   

   Douglas Dana Edward^2 Parker-Goncz to All   

   Re: Enumerating the Unit Volumes and The   

   28 Nov 21 12:20:26   

   2,911b   

   16910   

   J. J. Lodder to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   15 Nov 21 12:19:50   

   3k   

   16909   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   12 Nov 21 14:34:31   

   2k   

   16908   

   stargene to All   

   String Theory's dictionary and the Shann   

   11 Nov 21 10:02:43   

   1,855b   

   16907   

   Tom Capizzi to DRLunsford   

   Re: Relativistic vs. Euclidean geometry    

   08 Nov 21 10:33:24   

   7k   

   16906   

   J. J. Lodder to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   23 Oct 21 22:03:05   

   2k   

   16905   

   J. J. Lodder to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   22 Oct 21 20:07:38   

   2k   

   16904   

   Sylvia Else to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: "Classical transport"   

   04 Oct 21 07:16:18   

   1,614b   

   16903   

   Gary Harnagel to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Breaking the light speed barrier (Ar   

   04 Oct 21 07:16:18   

   1k   

   16902   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   "Classical transport"   

   01 Oct 21 14:48:53   

   2k   

   16901   

   Jos Bergervoet to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   27 Sep 21 10:39:51   

   3k   

   16900   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   26 Sep 21 07:47:09   

   2k   

   16899   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   25 Sep 21 10:15:42   

   1k   

   16898   

   J. J. Lodder to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   25 Sep 21 09:03:57   

   2k   

   16897   

   Tom Roberts to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   25 Sep 21 07:16:38   

   2k   

   16896   

   Douglas Dana Edward^2 Parker-Goncz to All   

   Re: Enumerating the Unit Volumes and The   

   25 Sep 21 07:12:18   

   3k   

   16895   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   25 Sep 21 07:12:18   

   2k   

   16894   

   J. J. Lodder to Eric Flesch   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   25 Sep 21 07:12:17   

   2k   

   16893   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Flesch   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   22 Sep 21 06:52:48   

   3k   

   16892   

   Eric Flesch to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   22 Sep 21 08:57:12   

   2k   

   16891   

   stargene to All   

   Re: Lloyd & Ng on limits of physical mea   

   20 Sep 21 07:32:53   

   2k   

   16890   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   19 Sep 21 11:13:13   

   2k   

   16889   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   19 Sep 21 11:12:33   

   4k   

   16888   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   18 Sep 21 20:51:54   

   2k   

   16887   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   18 Sep 21 20:50:20   

   5k   

   16886   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to stargene   

   Re: Lloyd & Ng on limits of physical mea   

   17 Sep 21 08:57:03   

   2k   

   16885   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   16 Sep 21 21:16:51   

   3k   

   16884   

   J. J. Lodder to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   16 Sep 21 12:29:52   

   3k   

   16883   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   15 Sep 21 07:22:02   

   3k   

   16882   

   stargene to All   

   Lloyd & Ng on limits of physical measure   

   09 Sep 21 11:36:15   

   2k   

   16881   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: Tutorial #1, why you can't measure '   

   05 Sep 21 10:45:47   

   1k   

   16880   

   J. J. Lodder to Richard Livingston   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   03 Sep 21 14:06:17   

   3k   

   16879   

   Richard Livingston to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   01 Sep 21 20:27:37   

   1k   

   16878   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Tutorial #1, why you can't measure 'chan   

   01 Sep 21 20:27:07   

   5k   

   16877   

   J. J. Lodder to I'll try to   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   31 Aug 21 13:01:05   

   3k   

   16876   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   31 Aug 21 09:21:45   

   3k   

   16875   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   30 Aug 21 22:26:15   

   2k   

   16874   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   30 Aug 21 14:58:55   

   3k   

   16873   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Bergervoet   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   30 Aug 21 10:48:57   

   2k   

   16872   

   Jos Bergervoet to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   30 Aug 21 12:53:48   

   2k   

   16871   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   29 Aug 21 11:04:26   

   3k   

   16870   

   Tom Roberts to Eric Flesch   

   Re: Breaking the light speed barrier (Ar   

   16 Aug 21 12:14:44   

   1k   

   16869   

   J. J. Lodder to Tom Roberts   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   11 Aug 21 09:35:42   

   4k   

   16868   

   Jos Bergervoet to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   09 Aug 21 10:54:53   

   2k   

   16867   

   J. J. Lodder to Thomas Koenig   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   09 Aug 21 09:55:34   

   2k   

   16866   

   Thomas Koenig to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   07 Aug 21 09:08:02   

   1,546b   

   16865   

   M P to All   

   Chemistry Research Question: Comparing b   

   07 Aug 21 01:04:16   

   2k   

   16864   

   J. J. Lodder to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   06 Aug 21 20:11:10   

   3k   

   16863   

   J. J. Lodder to Tom Roberts   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   06 Aug 21 20:09:00   

   3k   

   16862   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   03 Aug 21 07:11:59   

   3k   

   16861   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   03 Aug 21 07:12:00   

   3k   

   16860   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   31 Jul 21 14:41:22   

   3k   

   16859   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Penrose and the singularity   

   29 Jul 21 09:54:55   

   2,991b   

   16858   

   Zurab Silagadze to Zurab Silagadze   

   Re: Breaking the light speed barrier (Ar   

   26 Jul 21 06:59:40   

   2,991b   

   16857   

   Gary Harnagel to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: QFT making leaky BH horizons?   

   24 Jul 21 09:23:52   

   3k   

   16856   

   Gary Harnagel to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: QFT making leaky BH horizons?   

   18 Jul 21 13:03:56   

   3k   

   16855   

   Jos Bergervoet to Hongyi Zhao   

   Re: About the partial differential symbo   

   13 Jul 21 08:49:05   

   2,746b   

   16854   

   Tom Roberts to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   13 Jul 21 08:48:31   

   2k   

   16853   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   13 Jul 21 08:48:31   

   1k   

   16852   

   Hongyi Zhao to All   

   About the partial differential symbol us   

   12 Jul 21 18:06:05   

   1,458b   

   16851   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   12 Jul 21 10:18:54   

   3k   

   16850   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   07 Jul 21 10:20:46   

   1k   

   16849   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   07 Jul 21 10:20:25   

   2k   

   16848   

   J. J. Lodder to Tom Roberts   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   07 Jul 21 10:20:17   

   2k   

   16847   

   J. J. Lodder to Thomas Koenig   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   07 Jul 21 09:32:22   

   2,466b   

   16846   

   J. J. Lodder to Tom Roberts   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   07 Jul 21 09:31:52   

   1k   

   16845   

   J. J. Lodder to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   07 Jul 21 08:12:24   

   3k   

   16844   

   asjcharles@gmail.com to All   

   =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IElzIGVsZWN0cm9uJ3Mg4oCcc3   

   06 Jul 21 07:34:09   

   2k   

   16843   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   05 Jul 21 11:45:29   

   3k   

   16842   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   05 Jul 21 11:44:14   

   2k   

   16841   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   05 Jul 21 11:37:17   

   2k   

   16840   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   05 Jul 21 11:36:59   

   5k   

   16839   

   Tom Roberts to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   05 Jul 21 11:36:42   

   1k   

   16838   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   05 Jul 21 11:36:02   

   1,340b   

   16837   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   05 Jul 21 11:49:09   

   3k   

   16836   

   Tom Roberts to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   30 Jun 21 20:37:20   

   2k   

   16835   

   Jos Bergervoet to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   29 Jun 21 11:49:51   

   2k   

   16834   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   29 Jun 21 14:51:44   

   3k   

   16833   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to israel socratus   

   Re: =?UTF-8?B?SXMgZWxlY3Ryb24ncyDigJxzcG   

   29 Jun 21 14:51:44   

   1k   

   16832   

   israel socratus to All   

   =?UTF-8?B?SXMgZWxlY3Ryb24ncyDigJxzcGlu4o   

   29 Jun 21 12:34:24   

   1,353b   

   16831   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   28 Jun 21 23:41:37   

   3k   

   16830   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   28 Jun 21 14:28:01   

   2k   

   16829   

   Tom Roberts to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   27 Jun 21 07:38:56   

   1k   

   16828   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to tkoenig@netcologne.de   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   26 Jun 21 15:57:35   

   1,378b   

   16827   

   Thomas Koenig to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   26 Jun 21 13:07:39   

   1,378b   

   16826   

   Thomas Koenig to Tom Roberts   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   22 Jun 21 07:14:13   

   1,378b   

   16825   

   Tom Roberts to mark horn   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   21 Jun 21 14:10:48   

   1,378b   

   16824   

   mark horn to Thomas Koenig   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   21 Jun 21 14:32:02   

   1,378b   

   16823   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: Does The Singularity Exist?   

   21 Jun 21 14:32:02   

   2k   

   16822   

   mark horn to mark horn   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   21 Jun 21 14:32:02   

   2k   

   16821   

   Thomas Koenig to mark horn   

   Re: relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   21 Jun 21 09:48:14   

   2,056b   

   16820   

   mark horn to All   

   relativistic gamma factor maximum   

   21 Jun 21 01:01:04   

   2k   

   16819   

   israel socratus to All   

   Does The Singularity Exist?   

   19 Jun 21 09:00:01   

   1k   

   16818   

   Ray Tomes to All   

   Re: Why is push gravity concept consider   

   11 Jun 21 07:13:07   

   2k   

   16817   

   Douglas Dana Edward^2 Parker-Goncz to All   

   Enumerating the Unit Volumes and Their S   

   06 Jun 21 14:22:04   

   3k   

   16816   

   Jos Bergervoet to stargene   

   Re: QFT making leaky BH horizons?   

   02 Jun 21 19:46:59   

   2k   

   16815   

   stargene to All   

   QFT making leaky BH horizons?   

   02 Jun 21 08:18:08   

   2,336b   

   16814   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Electromagnetic force and gravity fo   

   24 May 21 20:02:18   

   3k   

   16813   

   Rich L. to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Electromagnetic force and gravity fo   

   20 May 21 14:56:20   

   3k   

   16812   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Electromagnetic force and gravity force   

   18 May 21 14:06:37   

   2,612b   

   16811   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   natbib, \citet, numerical references: sp   

   16 May 21 14:10:17   

   2,612b   

   16810   

   p.kinsler@ic.ac.uk to Alex   

   Re: Difference between F=ma and F=m1*m2/   

   29 Apr 21 07:54:33   

   1k   

   16809   

   Alex to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Difference between F=ma and F=m1*m2/   

   19 Apr 21 19:35:21   

   2k   

   16808   

   Angelo to All   

   Magnetic energy storing - SMES   

   19 Apr 21 11:20:28   

   2,280b   

   16807   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Difference between F=ma and F=m1*m2/   

   10 Apr 21 11:45:50   

   2k   

   16806   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Difference between F=ma and F=m1*m2/d^2   

   10 Apr 21 09:40:11   

   1,973b   

   16805   

   jacobnavia to All   

   Re: How well do we know the value of G?   

   06 Apr 21 18:48:11   

   1k   

   16804   

   undress to reply to carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu   

   Re: How well do we know the value of G?   

   11 Mar 21 07:44:30   

   3k   

   16803   

   Steven Carlip to All   

   Re: How well do we know the value of G?   

   11 Mar 21 07:20:08   

   1k   

   16802   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   How well do we know the value of G?   

   10 Mar 21 10:09:17   

   1,357b   

   16801   

   Jos Bergervoet to George Hrabovsky   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   27 Feb 21 11:11:43   

   4k   

   16800   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   The European Physical Journal H and LaTe   

   26 Feb 21 14:11:36   

   3,833b   

   16799   

   George Hrabovsky to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   25 Feb 21 00:20:27   

   3k   

   16798   

   p.kinsler@ic.ac.uk to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   21 Feb 21 20:01:34   

   3,217b   

   16797   

   Jos Bergervoet to p.kinsler@ic.ac.uk   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   20 Feb 21 13:21:53   

   2k   

   16796   

   p.kinsler@ic.ac.uk to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   19 Feb 21 08:45:35   

   2,043b   

   16795   

   Jos Bergervoet to p.kinsler@ic.ac.uk   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   10 Feb 21 12:23:03   

   2k   

   16794   

   p.kinsler@ic.ac.uk to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   10 Feb 21 10:31:57   

   1k   

   16793   

   Lou to carlip..   

   Re: Why is push gravity concept consider   

   07 Feb 21 09:04:17   

   6k   

   16792   

   Douglas Eagleson to richali...@gmail.com   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   05 Feb 21 18:30:39   

   2k   

   16791   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   05 Feb 21 18:30:09   

   3k   

   16790   

   LouDeeCruz to carlip...@physics.ucdavis.edu   

   Re: Why is push gravity concept consider   

   05 Feb 21 13:55:26   

   4k   

   16789   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   02 Feb 21 10:07:34   

   2k   

   16788   

   Richard Livingston to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   31 Jan 21 15:42:44   

   2k   

   16787   

   Jos Bergervoet to Douglas Eagleson   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   29 Jan 21 13:32:25   

   5k   

   16786   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   29 Jan 21 18:38:41   

   1k   

   16785   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   29 Jan 21 16:08:22   

   2k   

   16784   

   Douglas Eagleson to All   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   27 Jan 21 15:24:22   

   3k   

   16783   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Lodder"   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   25 Jan 21 15:03:23   

   4k   

   16782   

   Douglas Eagleson to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   25 Jan 21 15:02:32   

   7k   

   16781   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   24 Jan 21 12:31:02   

   2k   

   16780   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Douglas Eagleson   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   23 Jan 21 17:50:06   

   2k   

   16779   

   Jos Bergervoet to Douglas Eagleson   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   18 Jan 21 21:34:32   

   4k   

   16778   

   Douglas Eagleson to All   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   18 Jan 21 18:16:13   

   2k   

   16777   

   Richard D. Saam to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   06 Jan 21 21:06:01   

   1,747b   

   16776   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Re: confirmation of undisputed results   

   04 Jan 21 20:19:28   

   2k   

   16775   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   confirmation of undisputed results   

   04 Jan 21 09:49:07   

   2,085b   

   16774   

   Alex to All   

   Re: Physics Today provides free access t   

   26 Dec 20 19:43:30   

   2,085b   

   16773   

   Jos Bergervoet to Gary Harnagel   

   Re: Neutrino Energy?   

   25 Dec 20 21:38:36   

   2,085b   

   16772   

   Jay R. Yablon to All   

   Published: QCD Theory of the Hadrons and   

   16 Dec 20 14:40:00   

   2,085b   

   16771   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: Does the bridge collapse under the w   

   16 Dec 20 08:15:16   

   2k   

   16770   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Does the bridge collapse under the w   

   14 Dec 20 21:08:13   

   2k   

   16769   

   Bruce Scott to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Does the bridge collapse under the w   

   12 Dec 20 18:13:37   

   1,583b   

   16768   

   Jos Bergervoet to Rock Brentwood   

   Re: Navier-Stokes questions..   

   28 Nov 20 11:35:03   

   3k   

   16767   

   Rock Brentwood to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Navier-Stokes questions..   

   22 Nov 20 21:08:12   

   2k   

   16766   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Does the bridge collapse under the weigh   

   13 Nov 20 20:02:51   

   1,824b   

   16765   

   Sylvia Else to rockbrentwood@gmail.com   

   Re: Calculating the gravity field of a q   

   13 Nov 20 19:45:22   

   1,824b   

   16764   

   George Hrabovsky to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Navier-Stokes questions..   

   10 Nov 20 12:09:54   

   2k   

   16763   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Navier-Stokes questions..   

   08 Nov 20 16:18:02   

   1k   

   16762   

   Tom Roberts to rockbrentwood@gmail.com   

   Re: Time-rate change in relatively movin   

   26 Oct 20 10:23:43   

   2k   

   16761   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All   

   Calculating the gravity field of a quant   

   22 Oct 20 07:10:32   

   2k   

   16760   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to PengKuan Em   

   Re: Time-rate change in relatively movin   

   21 Oct 20 21:23:12   

   7k   

   16759   

   stargene to All   

   What do ultrarelativistic particles add    

   10 Oct 20 10:47:53   

   4k   

   16758   

   Savin Beniwal to All   

   Re: Cosmological Principle-Homogenous an   

   10 Oct 20 10:14:42   

   2k   

   16757   

   Tom Roberts to PengKuan Em   

   Re: Time-rate change in relatively movin   

   08 Sep 20 19:51:53   

   1k   

   16756   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Time-rate change in relatively moving fr   

   05 Sep 20 08:36:22   

   7k   

   16755   

   lydiamariewilliamson@gmail.com to rockbr...@gmail.com   

   Re: And 8 pi or what? (was: 8 pi G over    

   20 Aug 20 20:26:49   

   3k   

   16754   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Savin Beniwal   

   And 8 pi or what? (was: 8 pi G over c^3    

   20 Aug 20 09:04:34   

   7k   

   16753   

   Rock Brentwood to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Acceleration compared to which refer   

   14 Aug 20 05:56:51   

   5k   

   16752   

   Savin Beniwal to rockbr...@gmail.com   

   Re: 8 pi G over c^3 or c^4 or what?   

   13 Aug 20 17:51:51   

   2k   

   16751   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All   

   8 pi G over c^3 or c^4 or what?   

   12 Aug 20 08:50:47   

   3k   

   16750   

   is sad to All   

   Re: Acceleration compared to which refer   

   30 Jul 20 10:13:22   

   3,235b   

   16749   

   J. J. Lodder to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Acceleration compared to which refer   

   28 Jul 20 12:31:51   

   3,235b   

   16748   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Acceleration compared to which reference   

   27 Jul 20 15:26:06   

   3,235b   

   16747   

   Jos Bergervoet to is sad   

   Re: Two real fields with bi-quadratic co   

   14 Jul 20 08:03:05   

   2k   

   16746   

   is sad to All   

   Re: Two real fields with bi-quadratic co   

   10 Jul 20 11:20:47   

   2,217b   

   16745   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Two real fields with bi-quadratic coupli   

   20 Jun 20 13:06:28   

   2,217b   

   16744   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Two real fields with bi-quadratic coupli   

   19 Jun 20 08:15:29   

   2,217b   

   16743   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Nicolaas Vroom   

   All Of The Kinematic Groups (was: SR ver   

   18 Jun 20 05:55:54   

   7k   

   16742   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to rockbr...@gmail.com   

   Re: The Wolfram Physics Project   

   17 Jun 20 21:49:21   

   6,737b   

   16741   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All   

   Is Maxwell-Lorentz theory (and Yang-Mill   

   11 Jun 20 08:39:39   

   5k   

   16740   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All   

   Re: The Wolfram Physics Project   

   11 Jun 20 08:39:09   

   5,429b   

   16739   

   Douglas Eagleson to All   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   02 Jun 20 23:17:53   

   5,429b   

   16738   

   Hendrik van Hees to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   30 May 20 14:38:15   

   5k   

   16737   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   30 May 20 14:17:44   

   7k   

   16736   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   28 May 20 11:13:59   

   6k   

   16735   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Hendrik van Hees   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   25 May 20 13:38:44   

   2k   

   16734   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   25 May 20 13:38:45   

   2k   

   16733   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   25 May 20 13:38:44   

   3k   

   16732   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to All   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   23 May 20 11:10:51   

   2k   

   16731   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   22 May 20 13:57:20   

   2k   

   16730   

   Hendrik van Hees to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   22 May 20 19:22:18   

   3k   

   16729   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   22 May 20 19:15:36   

   2k   

   16728   

   Torn Rumero DeBrak to All   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   22 May 20 06:34:50   

   1k   

   16727   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   22 May 20 06:33:38   

   1k   

   16726   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   22 May 20 06:33:38   

   1k   

   16725   

   Douglas Eagleson to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The twins paradox   

   22 May 20 06:33:38   

   1k   

   16724   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The twins paradox   

   21 May 20 07:36:20   

   1k   

   16723   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Nicolaas Vroom   

   SR versus Electrodynamics   

   15 May 20 14:06:42   

   3k   

   16722   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to hees@fias.uni-frankfurt.de   

   Re: [External] Re: upright Greek letters   

   03 May 20 07:04:03   

   2k   

   16721   

   Hendrik van Hees to All   

   [External] Re: upright Greek letters for   

   02 May 20 14:38:01   

   5k   

   16720   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to hees@fias.uni-frankfurt.de   

   Re: upright Greek letters for constants    

   26 Apr 20 15:07:03   

   4k   

   16719   

   Jos Bergervoet to Michael Cole   

   Re: Unbound states of the hydrogen atom   

   26 Apr 20 15:06:42   

   3,607b   

   16718   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Ned Latham   

   Re: Electric and magnetic fields.   

   26 Apr 20 15:06:14   

   3,607b   

   16717   

   Hendrik van Hees to All   

   Re: upright Greek letters for constants    

   26 Apr 20 09:39:55   

   3k   

   16716   

   Michael Cole to All   

   Unbound states of the hydrogen atom   

   26 Apr 20 09:25:29   

   3,307b   

   16715   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   upright Greek letters for constants as o   

   26 Apr 20 09:23:51   

   2k   

   16714   

   Ned Latham to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: The Prismatic Effect   

   25 Apr 20 12:50:40   

   3k   

   16713   

   Ned Latham to All   

   Electric and magnetic fields.   

   25 Apr 20 20:43:14   

   2,616b   

   16712   

   Jos Bergervoet to benj   

   Re: The Prismatic Effect   

   25 Apr 20 16:14:13   

   2k   

   16711   

   Ned Latham to Ned Latham   

   Re: The Prismatic Effect   

   25 Apr 20 13:23:21   

   2,484b   

   16710   

   benj to Ned Latham   

   Re: The Prismatic Effect   

   17 Apr 20 12:02:54   

   2,484b   

   16709   

   Thomas Koenig to All   

   The Wolfram Physics Project   

   16 Apr 20 08:54:52   

   2,484b   

   16708   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Ned Latham   

   Re: The Prismatic Effect   

   15 Apr 20 23:20:28   

   2,484b   

   16707   

   Ned Latham to All   

   The Prismatic Effect   

   15 Apr 20 08:49:59   

   2,484b   

   16706   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   01 Apr 20 22:38:59   

   1k   

   16705   

   Tom Roberts to Michael Moroney   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   01 Apr 20 07:36:27   

   4k   

   16704   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to raymond.yohros@gmail.com   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   31 Mar 20 09:14:19   

   1k   

   16703   

   raymond.yohros@gmail.com to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   30 Mar 20 22:40:10   

   2k   

   16702   

   Ned Latham to Michael Moroney   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   30 Mar 20 22:27:50   

   1k   

   16701   

   raymond.yohros@gmail.com to Michael Moroney   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   30 Mar 20 20:57:22   

   1,369b   

   16700   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to richali...@gmail.com   

   Re: Measurement of electron spin directi   

   29 Mar 20 14:42:34   

   6k   

   16699   

   Ned Latham to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   29 Mar 20 07:58:38   

   1k   

   16698   

   Tom Roberts to raymond.yohros@gmail.com   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   27 Mar 20 08:16:59   

   1,190b   

   16697   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   27 Mar 20 08:17:00   

   3k   

   16696   

   raymond.yohros@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   26 Mar 20 23:24:52   

   2k   

   16695   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Measurement of electron spin directi   

   26 Mar 20 23:23:40   

   2k   

   16694   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to raymond.yohros@gmail.com   

   Re: non spinning black holes   

   26 Mar 20 11:53:51   

   2,431b   

   16693   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to raymond.yohros@gmail.com   

   Re: Neutrino speed and mass   

   26 Mar 20 11:53:29   

   1k   

   16692   

   raymond.yohros@gmail.com to All   

   non spinning black holes   

   25 Mar 20 22:45:35   

   1,322b   

   16691   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to richali...@gmail.com   

   Re: Measurement of electron spin directi   

   25 Mar 20 14:13:40   

   5k   

   16690   

   Jos Bergervoet to jhg852456951753@gmail.com   

   Re: Wave functions in accelerated refere   

   25 Mar 20 10:56:52   

   5,297b   

   16689   

   jhg852456951753@gmail.com to All   

   Wave functions in accelerated reference    

   23 Mar 20 20:25:52   

   5,297b   

   16688   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Measurement of electron spin directi   

   23 Mar 20 20:25:21   

   2k   

   16687   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Measurement of electron spin directi   

   19 Mar 20 16:53:13   

   3k   

   16686   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Re: Measurement of electron spin directi   

   15 Mar 20 11:18:04   

   3k   

   16685   

   Sylvia Else to ben6993@hotmail.com   

   Re: Measurement of electron spin directi   

   15 Mar 20 11:18:04   

   1k   

   16684   

   Jos Bergervoet to ben6993@hotmail.com   

   Re: Measurement of electron spin directi   

   15 Mar 20 08:45:02   

   2k   

   16683   

   Ned Latham to Ned Latham   

   Re: Doppler shift and refraction   

   14 Mar 20 10:45:21   

   1,541b   

   16682   

   Ned Latham to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Doppler shift and refraction   

   14 Mar 20 15:20:53   

   1,541b   

   16681   

   Jos Bergervoet to Ned Latham   

   Re: Doppler shift and refraction   

   14 Mar 20 15:07:18   

   1,541b   

   16680   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Measurement of electron spin directi   

   14 Mar 20 15:06:25   

   1k   

   16679   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Measurement of electron spin direction,    

   13 Mar 20 23:17:47   

   1,340b   

   16678   

   Ned Latham to All   

   Doppler shift and refraction   

   12 Mar 20 17:04:06   

   1,340b   

   16677   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to jmreno   

   Re: Planck Distance and Planck Time   

   09 Mar 20 17:19:22   

   1,340b   

   16676   

   J. J. Lodder to jmreno   

   Re: Planck Distance and Planck Time   

   09 Mar 20 22:48:48   

   1,340b   

   16675   

   jmreno to All   

   Planck Distance and Planck Time   

   08 Mar 20 11:02:56   

   1,340b   

   16674   

   Jos Bergervoet to JTS   

   Re: Newton vs. the machine   

   01 Mar 20 17:46:23   

   1,340b   

   16673   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Tug of war and hanging body   

   22 Feb 20 06:58:20   

   2k   

   16672   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Tug of war and hanging body   

   20 Feb 20 19:06:17   

   1,666b   

   16671   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: Black hole ringdown shows hair?   

   01 Feb 20 22:37:43   

   1k   

   16670   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl   

   Re: Black hole ringdown shows hair?   

   01 Feb 20 13:49:27   

   1,401b   

   16669   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Black hole ringdown shows hair?   

   01 Feb 20 18:40:19   

   1,401b   

   16668   

   Jos Bergervoet to Majik Won   

   Re: The Feynman Path Integra from First    

   05 Jan 20 11:48:24   

   3k   

   16667   

   Majik Won to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: The Feynman Path Integra from First    

   01 Jan 20 09:49:46   

   1k   

   16666   

   Jos Bergervoet to Majik Won   

   Re: [External] Re: The Feynman Path Inte   

   01 Jan 20 12:11:54   

   5k   

   16665   

   Majik Won to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: [External] Re: The Feynman Path Inte   

   01 Jan 20 08:58:14   

   4k   

   16664   

   Majik Won to All   

   Re: The Feynman Path Integra from First    

   10 Dec 19 22:08:22   

   1k   

   16663   

   Tom Roberts to Thomas Koenig   

   Re: Electrostatic charging of liquids in   

   21 Nov 19 21:49:46   

   1,380b   

   16662   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Thomas Koenig   

   Re: Electrostatic charging of liquids in   

   21 Nov 19 10:43:19   

   1k   

   16661   

   Thomas Koenig to All   

   Electrostatic charging of liquids in flo   

   20 Nov 19 22:16:39   

   1k   

   16660   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is the centripetal force real and is   

   20 Nov 19 16:28:52   

   1k   

   16659   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Is the centripetal force real and is the   

   19 Nov 19 21:51:35   

   1,133b   

   16658   

   Nicolaas Vroom to richali...@gmail.com   

   Re: The rigid rod paradox with 8 clocks.   

   17 Nov 19 09:35:31   

   1,133b   

   16657   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The rigid rod paradox with 8 clocks.   

   14 Nov 19 20:51:24   

   1,133b   

   16656   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The rigid rod paradox with 8 clocks.   

   14 Nov 19 20:51:24   

   7k   

   16655   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Propagation of forces in a gravitati   

   11 Nov 19 20:43:02   

   6,750b   

   16654   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to All   

   Giant monopoles as dark matter?   

   09 Nov 19 12:21:55   

   6,750b   

   16653   

   Tom Roberts to richalivingston@gmail.com   

   Re: Testing relativity of simultaneity u   

   08 Nov 19 10:04:06   

   1k   

   16652   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to PengKuan Em   

   Re: Testing relativity of simultaneity u   

   06 Nov 19 21:13:18   

   2k   

   16651   

   Tom Roberts to PengKuan Em   

   Re: Testing relativity of simultaneity u   

   06 Nov 19 13:03:40   

   2k   

   16650   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Re: Testing relativity of simultaneity u   

   06 Nov 19 08:08:26   

   1k   

   16649   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to All   

   Propagation of forces in a gravitational   

   31 Oct 19 20:56:43   

   5k   

   16648   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to PengKuan Em   

   Re: Testing relativity of simultaneity u   

   31 Oct 19 20:56:12   

   3k   

   16647   

   From: "Jonathan Thornburg [remove - to All   

   this thread is now closed (was: Re: Can    

   12 Sep 19 15:00:57   

   1k   

   16646   

   JTS to All   

   Thermodynamics of photoluminescence   

   12 Sep 19 01:15:06   

   2k   

   16645   

   Lawrence Crowell to stargene   

   Re: Implications of QFT micro-fluctuatio   

   11 Sep 19 11:14:42   

   2k   

   16644   

   stargene to All   

   Implications of QFT micro-fluctuations i   

   11 Sep 19 05:50:52   

   2,518b   

   16643   

   jmariano to All   

   Re: Any newsgroups on nuclear physics?   

   09 Sep 19 15:23:59   

   2,518b   

   16642   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Re: Can the 2 ends of a ruler move in op   

   08 Sep 19 17:32:22   

   2k   

   16641   

   Tom Roberts to PengKuan Em   

   Re: Can the 2 ends of a ruler move in op   

   07 Sep 19 10:51:49   

   2k   

   16640   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Re: Can the 2 ends of a ruler move in op   

   07 Sep 19 08:15:37   

   1,779b   

   16639   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Can the 2 ends of a ruler move in opposi   

   03 Sep 19 23:12:10   

   1,779b   

   16638   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The twins and Einstein's train   

   03 Sep 19 11:17:45   

   1,779b   

   16637   

   =?UTF-8?B?VG9tbWkgSMO2eW7DpGzDpG5tY to All   

   Forces in the equilibrium states of mole   

   02 Sep 19 18:08:40   

   1k   

   16636   

   jmariano to richali...@gmail.com   

   Re: Any newsgroups on nuclear physics?   

   30 Aug 19 07:17:13   

   1k   

   16635   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The two postulates of SR.   

   29 Aug 19 20:02:25   

   1k   

   16634   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to jmariano   

   Re: Any newsgroups on nuclear physics?   

   29 Aug 19 14:41:38   

   1,391b   

   16633   

   jmariano to All   

   Any newsgroups on nuclear physics?   

   29 Aug 19 07:05:48   

   1,391b   

   16632   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The two postulates of SR.   

   27 Aug 19 06:37:10   

   3k   

   16631   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The two postulates of SR. (2/2)   

   25 Aug 19 08:03:58   

   3,355b   

   16630   

   Tom Roberts to Herbert Glazier   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   24 Aug 19 06:22:31   

   1k   

   16629   

   Gary Harnagel to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Coherent Beams   

   22 Aug 19 21:49:06   

   1,130b   

   16628   

   Tom Roberts to Douglas Eagleson   

   Re: Coherent Beams   

   22 Aug 19 07:31:43   

   2k   

   16627   

   Herbert Glazier to PengKuan Em   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   22 Aug 19 07:26:10   

   2k   

   16626   

   Eric Flesch to DGoncz@replikon.net   

   Re: 24-hour analog clock -- alternative    

   22 Aug 19 07:26:10   

   1,850b   

   16625   

   Douglas Eagleson to All   

   Coherent Beams   

   20 Aug 19 20:59:30   

   1,850b   

   16624   

   Douglas Dana Edward^2 Parker-Goncz to Eric Flesch   

   Re: 24-hour analog clock -- alternative    

   19 Aug 19 00:05:58   

   1,850b   

   16623   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The two postulates of SR.   

   14 Aug 19 12:40:45   

   1k   

   16622   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: [External] Re: How to test length co   

   13 Aug 19 21:36:03   

   3k   

   16621   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   The two postulates of SR.   

   08 Aug 19 06:39:42   

   4k   

   16620   

   Lawrence Crowell to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: [External] When Does an Observer Bec   

   07 Aug 19 01:03:33   

   3k   

   16619   

   Mike Fontenot to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: [External] When Does an Observer Bec   

   07 Aug 19 01:03:09   

   2,837b   

   16618   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   06 Aug 19 11:59:12   

   2k   

   16617   

   Stefan Ram to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: [External] When Does an Observer Bec   

   06 Aug 19 07:15:31   

   1k   

   16616   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   06 Aug 19 07:15:31   

   3k   

   16615   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   [External] When Does an Observer Become    

   04 Aug 19 16:59:09   

   2k   

   16614   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   04 Aug 19 10:17:57   

   1k   

   16613   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   04 Aug 19 10:17:57   

   3k   

   16612   

   Ken Seto to PengKuan Em   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   04 Aug 19 10:17:56   

   2k   

   16611   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   [External] Re: How to test length contra   

   03 Aug 19 14:16:11   

   2,042b   

   16610   

   Tom Roberts to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Unification of forces: the energy of   

   03 Aug 19 14:15:32   

   2,042b   

   16609   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   Why does one normalize states in quantum   

   02 Aug 19 13:06:56   

   2,042b   

   16608   

   Stefan Ram to All   

   Unification of forces: the energy of wha   

   01 Aug 19 12:37:37   

   2k   

   16607   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   01 Aug 19 12:34:30   

   3k   

   16606   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   01 Aug 19 12:33:03   

   1k   

   16605   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to All   

   Steven Weinberg in video on Einstein's b   

   31 Jul 19 11:02:33   

   1,437b   

   16604   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Sylvia Else   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   30 Jul 19 12:30:36   

   4k   

   16603   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   30 Jul 19 12:13:02   

   3,965b   

   16602   

   Sylvia Else to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   30 Jul 19 13:59:32   

   2k   

   16601   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   30 Jul 19 06:49:24   

   3k   

   16600   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   28 Jul 19 12:09:23   

   2k   

   16599   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Phillip Helbig   

   Re: [External] Re: How to test length co   

   28 Jul 19 10:21:01   

   4k   

   16598   

   Eric Flesch to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: [External] Re: How to test length co   

   27 Jul 19 08:19:44   

   1k   

   16597   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net   

   [External] Re: How to test length contra   

   26 Jul 19 08:57:08   

   3k   

   16596   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   25 Jul 19 15:16:32   

   3k   

   16595   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   22 Jul 19 23:41:06   

   2k   

   16594   

   Lawrence Crowell to All   

   Re: Cosmological Principle-Homogenous an   

   20 Jul 19 09:12:03   

   2k   

   16593   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Cosmological Principle-Homogenous an   

   18 Jul 19 01:25:56   

   3k   

   16592   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   16 Jul 19 16:50:43   

   2k   

   16591   

   Lawrence Crowell to Savin Beniwal   

   Re: Cosmological Principle-Homogenous an   

   16 Jul 19 16:49:39   

   2k   

   16590   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Savin Beniwal   

   Re: Cosmological Principle-Homogenous an   

   16 Jul 19 16:47:48   

   2k   

   16589   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   16 Jul 19 22:10:21   

   2k   

   16588   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   16 Jul 19 22:09:51   

   6k   

   16587   

   Savin Beniwal to All   

   Cosmological Principle-Homogenous and Is   

   15 Jul 19 05:53:11   

   5,739b   

   16586   

   Eric Flesch to Tom Roberts   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   14 Jul 19 20:49:13   

   5,739b   

   16585   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   14 Jul 19 17:56:11   

   7k   

   16584   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   13 Jul 19 17:53:25   

   1k   

   16583   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   12 Jul 19 23:11:05   

   4k   

   16582   

   ansiagorod@apspaps.org to All   

   [OT] Buying Feynman's lectures vol II   

   12 Jul 19 23:07:24   

   1k   

   16581   

   Hans Aberg to Eric Flesch   

   Re: 24-hour analog clock -- alternative    

   12 Jul 19 23:06:53   

   1,156b   

   16580   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to All   

   Moderator's Note: this thread is now clo   

   11 Jul 19 22:45:04   

   1k   

   16579   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   10 Jul 19 19:58:11   

   1,129b   

   16578   

   Tom Roberts to rockbrentwood@gmail.com   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   10 Jul 19 10:20:46   

   3k   

   16577   

   Ogtrop Snaijer to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   10 Jul 19 11:38:49   

   1k   

   16576   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   10 Jul 19 00:13:13   

   4k   

   16575   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   10 Jul 19 06:56:12   

   3k   

   16574   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   10 Jul 19 06:56:11   

   3k   

   16573   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   09 Jul 19 21:13:56   

   3k   

   16572   

   Nicolaas Vroom to PengKuan Em   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   09 Jul 19 21:13:26   

   2k   

   16571   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   09 Jul 19 19:01:36   

   3k   

   16570   

   J. J. Lodder to Eric Flesch   

   Re: 24-hour analog clock -- alternative    

   07 Jul 19 13:14:19   

   2k   

   16569   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   07 Jul 19 11:41:44   

   2k   

   16568   

   Stefan Ram to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   06 Jul 19 12:34:51   

   2,110b   

   16567   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   06 Jul 19 06:22:24   

   2,110b   

   16566   

   Lawrence Crowell to Sylvia Else   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   06 Jul 19 06:22:23   

   2k   

   16565   

   Nicolaas Vroom to PengKuan Em   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   05 Jul 19 23:48:32   

   3k   

   16564   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   05 Jul 19 23:48:02   

   2k   

   16563   

   Mike Fontenot to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   04 Jul 19 20:42:01   

   3k   

   16562   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   04 Jul 19 20:41:30   

   2,647b   

   16561   

   Tom Roberts to Eric Flesch   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   04 Jul 19 07:19:53   

   5k   

   16560   

   Tom Roberts to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   04 Jul 19 07:19:53   

   1k   

   16559   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   04 Jul 19 07:18:12   

   1k   

   16558   

   Oliver Jennrich to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   03 Jul 19 20:40:09   

   1,186b   

   16557   

   Oliver Jennrich to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   03 Jul 19 11:09:44   

   2k   

   16556   

   Mike Fontenot to All   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   03 Jul 19 09:22:23   

   7k   

   16555   

   Steven Carlip to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   03 Jul 19 08:50:44   

   1k   

   16554   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   03 Jul 19 07:18:48   

   1,467b   

   16553   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   02 Jul 19 12:36:49   

   1k   

   16552   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   02 Jul 19 12:36:14   

   1,185b   

   16551   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   02 Jul 19 09:08:51   

   2k   

   16550   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   02 Jul 19 08:48:02   

   1k   

   16549   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   02 Jul 19 08:47:31   

   1k   

   16548   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   02 Jul 19 08:47:01   

   1k   

   16547   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   01 Jul 19 21:26:43   

   1,386b   

   16546   

   Tom Roberts to PengKuan Em   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   01 Jul 19 11:44:00   

   1,386b   

   16545   

   kunz to PengKuan Em   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   30 Jun 19 11:06:04   

   1,386b   

   16544   

   Eric Flesch to PengKuan Em   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   30 Jun 19 07:53:29   

   2k   

   16543   

   Lawrence Crowell to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   30 Jun 19 07:53:29   

   2k   

   16542   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   29 Jun 19 19:41:21   

   1k   

   16541   

   Michael Cole to All   

   How to test length contraction by experi   

   28 Jun 19 00:08:03   

   1,361b   

   16540   

   Oliver Jennrich to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The gelatin sphere   

   28 Jun 19 00:07:43   

   2k   

   16539   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to Rock Brentwood   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   27 Jun 19 21:43:13   

   4k   

   16538   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The gelatin sphere   

   27 Jun 19 11:14:49   

   4,036b   

   16537   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   26 Jun 19 09:40:31   

   2k   

   16536   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Fontenot   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   26 Jun 19 07:21:42   

   1k   

   16535   

   =?UTF-8?B?VG9tbWkgSMO2eW7DpGzDpG5tY to All   

   Kinetic preconditioning   

   26 Jun 19 07:21:42   

   1,218b   

   16534   

   Stefan Ram to Sylvia Else   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   25 Jun 19 20:37:53   

   2k   

   16533   

   Mike Fontenot to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   25 Jun 19 20:37:13   

   1,954b   

   16532   

   Tom Roberts to Sylvia Else   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   25 Jun 19 07:33:18   

   2k   

   16531   

   Mike Fontenot to Mike Fontenot   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   25 Jun 19 07:33:18   

   1k   

   16530   

   Mike Fontenot to Sylvia Else   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   24 Jun 19 20:55:46   

   1k   

   16529   

   Sylvia Else to rockbrentwood@gmail.com   

   Re: The Twin Paradox: the role of accele   

   24 Jun 19 05:37:25   

   1k   

   16528   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   22 Jun 19 07:46:03   

   1,483b   

   16527   

   Stefan Ram to Sylvia Else   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   22 Jun 19 07:45:33   

   1k   

   16526   

   Sylvia Else to PengKuan Em   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   20 Jun 19 10:07:14   

   1k   

   16525   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   19 Jun 19 08:56:23   

   1,293b   

   16524   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to jos.bergervoet@nxp.com   

   Re: The Fatal Flaw of Many Worlds   

   19 Jun 19 08:55:18   

   3k   

   16523   

   Jos Bergervoet to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: The Fatal Flaw of Many Worlds   

   19 Jun 19 07:07:22   

   2k   

   16522   

   Jos Bergervoet to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The Fatal Flaw of Many Worlds   

   18 Jun 19 19:33:59   

   3k   

   16521   

   Stefan Ram to PengKuan Em   

   Re: How to test length contraction by ex   

   17 Jun 19 16:07:39   

   2k   

   16520   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   How to test length contraction by experi   

   17 Jun 19 20:31:42   

   2k   

   16519   

   Stefan Ram to Michael Cole   

   Re: The Fatal Flaw of Many Worlds   

   17 Jun 19 20:31:12   

   2k   

   16518   

   Lawrence Crowell to Michael Cole   

   Re: The Fatal Flaw of Many Worlds   

   17 Jun 19 00:52:26   

   2,141b   

   16517   

   Michael Cole to All   

   The Fatal Flaw of Many Worlds   

   16 Jun 19 16:41:35   

   2,141b   

   16516   

   Lawrence Crowell to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Stern-Gerlach question.   

   15 Jun 19 19:18:56   

   2k   

   16515   

   FrediFizzx to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Stern-Gerlach question.   

   15 Jun 19 19:18:39   

   1k   

   16514   

   roselivingston753@gmail.com to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Stern-Gerlach question.   

   15 Jun 19 19:18:20   

   2k   

   16513   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Stern-Gerlach question.   

   14 Jun 19 14:27:17   

   1,765b   

   16512   

   Jos Bergervoet to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: The Fatal Flaw of Many Worlds   

   12 Jun 19 07:17:01   

   1,765b   

   16511   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to rockbrentwood@gmail.com   

   Re: The Fatal Flaw of Many Worlds   

   12 Jun 19 07:08:16   

   1k   

   16510   

   J. J. Lodder to Michael Cole   

   Re: Orthogonal polynomials   

   07 Jun 19 09:02:55   

   1k   

   16509   

   Jos Bergervoet to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Series expansion   

   05 Jun 19 17:03:38   

   2k   

   16508   

   JTS to All   

   Re: Orthogonal polynomials   

   03 Jun 19 10:20:09   

   1k   

   16507   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Re: Series expansion   

   02 Jun 19 18:35:48   

   4k   

   16506   

   Michael Cole to All   

   Orthogonal polynomials   

   02 Jun 19 20:25:14   

   2k   

   16505   

   Stefan Ram to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: Ripping Apart the Multiverse and Ant   

   30 May 19 07:17:29   

   2k   

   16504   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Series expansion   

   28 May 19 07:25:17   

   1k   

   16503   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Ripping Apart the Multiverse and Ant   

   28 May 19 05:53:33   

   1,438b   

   16502   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to rockbrentwood@gmail.com   

   Re: Ripping Apart the Multiverse and Ant   

   27 May 19 10:45:21   

   5k   

   16501   

   mfreeman1943@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Series expansion   

   25 May 19 10:14:13   

   4,629b   

   16500   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to mitchrae3323@gmail.com   

   Re: Globular clusters orbiting what cent   

   05 May 19 13:59:52   

   1k   

   16499   

   mitchrae3323@gmail.com to All   

   Globular clusters orbiting what center?   

   05 May 19 07:53:04   

   1,127b   

   16498   

   p.kinsler@ic.ac.uk to All   

   Re: The second principle   

   02 May 19 07:20:38   

   1,127b   

   16497   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The second principle   

   02 May 19 07:20:37   

   2k   

   16496   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   02 May 19 07:20:37   

   4k   

   16495   

   Steven Carlip to p.kinsler@ic.ac.uk   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   01 May 19 19:24:04   

   2k   

   16494   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The second principle   

   01 May 19 16:22:28   

   1k   

   16493   

   augustin.coppey@gmail.com to All   

   Re: The second principle   

   01 May 19 12:01:18   

   1,273b   

   16492   

   p.kinsler@ic.ac.uk to Steven Carlip   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   01 May 19 10:25:27   

   1,273b   

   16491   

   Lawrence Crowell to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The second principle   

   01 May 19 07:14:18   

   1k   

   16490   

   Jonathan Thornburg to J.B. Wood   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   30 Apr 19 17:56:41   

   5k   

   16489   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The second principle   

   29 Apr 19 20:50:20   

   5,037b   

   16488   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The second principle   

   29 Apr 19 18:03:38   

   5,037b   

   16487   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   27 Apr 19 18:25:49   

   5,037b   

   16486   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   26 Apr 19 17:01:26   

   1k   

   16485   

   pellis to J.B. Wood   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   26 Apr 19 16:59:59   

   1k   

   16484   

   Steven Carlip to J.B. Wood   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   26 Apr 19 19:53:17   

   4k   

   16483   

   Stefan Ram to J.B. Wood   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   26 Apr 19 17:21:59   

   3,686b   

   16482   

   J.B. Wood to All   

   The "Force" of Gravity (Thanks)   

   26 Apr 19 15:15:11   

   3,686b   

   16481   

   J.B. Wood to pellis   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   25 Apr 19 22:49:22   

   1k   

   16480   

   J.B. Wood to Stefan Ram   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   25 Apr 19 22:48:51   

   1k   

   16479   

   pellis to J.B. Wood   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   24 Apr 19 14:38:35   

   2k   

   16478   

   J.B. Wood to pellis   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   24 Apr 19 10:53:10   

   1k   

   16477   

   pellis to J.B. Wood   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   24 Apr 19 09:31:58   

   1,421b   

   16476   

   Stefan Ram to J.B. Wood   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   24 Apr 19 06:51:35   

   1,421b   

   16475   

   J.B. Wood to Rich L.   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   22 Apr 19 21:48:46   

   2k   

   16474   

   Rich L. to J.B. Wood   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   20 Apr 19 14:25:03   

   3k   

   16473   

   J.B. Wood to Rich L.   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   19 Apr 19 21:57:45   

   2k   

   16472   

   Lawrence Crowell to J.B. Wood   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   19 Apr 19 16:34:21   

   1k   

   16471   

   Rich L. to J.B. Wood   

   Re: The "Force" of Gravity   

   18 Apr 19 10:48:52   

   2k   

   16470   

   J.B. Wood to All   

   The "Force" of Gravity   

   18 Apr 19 00:28:33   

   2,221b   

   16469   

   filmart@gmail.com to All   

   The recent BH parameters   

   17 Apr 19 07:22:44   

   2,221b   

   16468   

   Stefan Ram to Phillip Helbig   

   Re: Acceleration on the carousel   

   14 Apr 19 21:56:24   

   4k   

   16467   

   stargene to stargene   

   Re: Lambda^-1 as cosmic computational po   

   12 Apr 19 12:11:49   

   3k   

   16466   

   Stefan Ram to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Energy Conservation Question (1/4)   

   12 Apr 19 10:59:34   

   6k   

   16465   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to stargene   

   Re: Lambda^-1 as cosmic computational po   

   08 Apr 19 13:31:42   

   6,631b   

   16464   

   Stefan Ram to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Energy Conservation Question   

   08 Apr 19 07:09:33   

   2k   

   16463   

   Stefan Ram to J.B. Wood   

   Re: Energy Conservation Question   

   07 Apr 19 10:13:08   

   2,398b   

   16462   

   Rich L. to Sylvia Else   

   Re: Energy Conservation Question   

   07 Apr 19 10:13:07   

   2k   

   16461   

   Jos Bergervoet to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Energy Conservation Question   

   07 Apr 19 09:05:40   

   2k   

   16460   

   Stefan Ram to J.B. Wood   

   Re: Energy Conservation Question   

   07 Apr 19 07:54:56   

   2k   

   16459   

   Lawrence Crowell to rockbr...@gmail.com   

   Re: Schroedinger's Cat has no Physical R   

   06 Apr 19 13:38:33   

   2k   

   16458   

   Sylvia Else to J.B. Wood   

   Re: Energy Conservation Question   

   06 Apr 19 07:31:50   

   2k   

   16457   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Schroedinger's Cat has no Physical R   

   05 Apr 19 06:44:02   

   2k   

   16456   

   Douglas Eagleson to Jonathan Thornburg   

   Re: how to find smallest-area ellipsoid    

   04 Apr 19 05:49:07   

   1k   

   16455   

   Lawrence Crowell to rockbr...@gmail.com   

   Re: Schroedinger's Cat has no Physical R   

   03 Apr 19 22:51:18   

   3k   

   16454   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All   

   The physical relevance of macroscopic co   

   03 Apr 19 21:58:52   

   2,589b   

   16453   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Schroedinger's Cat has no Physical Relev   

   03 Apr 19 21:58:51   

   2k   

   16452   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Jonathan Thornburg   

   Re: how to find smallest-area ellipsoid    

   03 Apr 19 21:58:51   

   3k   

   16451   

   Thomas Koenig to Savin Beniwal   

   Re: If errors is higher than best fit va   

   30 Mar 19 11:47:01   

   2k   

   16450   

   Jos Bergervoet to Savin Beniwal   

   Re: If errors is higher than best fit va   

   30 Mar 19 11:46:46   

   1k   

   16449   

   Tom Roberts to Savin Beniwal   

   Re: If errors is higher than best fit va   

   29 Mar 19 22:09:11   

   2k   

   16448   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Acceleration on the carousel   

   28 Mar 19 13:05:47   

   2k   

   16447   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Acceleration on the carousel   

   28 Mar 19 07:38:10   

   2k   

   16446   

   Savin Beniwal to All   

   If errors is higher than best fit value?   

   27 Mar 19 11:10:27   

   1,679b   

   16445   

   Lawrence Crowell to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Preparation of electron spin directi   

   02 Mar 19 09:01:28   

   1,679b   

   16444   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Re: Preparation of electron spin directi   

   02 Mar 19 08:45:24   

   2k   

   16443   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Preparation of electron spin directi   

   01 Mar 19 09:09:31   

   3k   

   16442   

   Lawrence Crowell to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Preparation of electron spin directi   

   28 Feb 19 21:49:42   

   2k   

   16441   

   Jos Bergervoet to ben6993@hotmail.com   

   Re: Preparation of electron spin directi   

   28 Feb 19 21:49:30   

   2k   

   16440   

   Tom Roberts to ben6993@hotmail.com   

   Re: Preparation of electron spin directi   

   28 Feb 19 07:27:30   

   2,291b   

   16439   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Re: Preparation of electron spin directi   

   26 Feb 19 17:18:51   

   2,291b   

   16438   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Preparation of electron spin directions   

   26 Feb 19 19:30:36   

   1k   

   16437   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to toadast...@gmail.com   

   Re: gamma factor in special relativity   

   11 Feb 19 14:14:50   

   4k   

   16436   

   ma.atashi91@gmail.com to All   

   Re: AdS/CFT.   

   03 Feb 19 11:36:39   

   3,815b   

   16435   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Gary Harnagel   

   Re: physical status of something "comput   

   25 Jan 19 12:26:55   

   1k   

   16434   

   poraty6@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Corollary to the principles of dynam   

   24 Jan 19 10:53:15   

   2k   

   16433   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: physical status of something "comput   

   22 Jan 19 13:35:24   

   1k   

   16432   

   Lawrence Crowell to Gary Harnagel   

   Re: physical status of something "comput   

   22 Jan 19 08:23:39   

   3k   

   16431   

   Libor Striz to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re:Acceleration on the carousel   

   22 Jan 19 08:22:15   

   1k   

   16430   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Gary Harnagel   

   Re: physical status of something "comput   

   22 Jan 19 08:22:15   

   1k   

   16429   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Acceleration on the carousel   

   21 Jan 19 20:13:03   

   1,234b   

   16428   

   Gary Harnagel to All   

   Re: physical status of something "comput   

   20 Jan 19 07:20:29   

   1,234b   

   16427   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to Douglas Eagleson   

   Re: physical status of something "comput   

   17 Jan 19 16:53:34   

   2k   

   16426   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to por...@gmail.com   

   Re: Circular motion without centripetal    

   17 Jan 19 16:35:00   

   1k   

   16425   

   J. J. Lodder to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Circular motion without centripetal    

   15 Jan 19 20:03:12   

   1k   

   16424   

   Jos Bergervoet to poraty6@gmail.com   

   Re: Circular motion without centripetal    

   15 Jan 19 20:02:42   

   1k   

   16423   

   Douglas Eagleson to All   

   Re: physical status of something "comput   

   15 Jan 19 20:02:12   

   1k   

   16422   

   poraty6@gmail.com to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Circular motion without centripetal    

   15 Jan 19 08:48:05   

   2k   

   16421   

   Jos Bergervoet to Sylvia Else   

   Re: Circular motion without centripetal    

   14 Jan 19 21:11:32   

   1k   

   16420   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Circular motion without centripetal    

   14 Jan 19 13:11:43   

   1k   

   16419   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Circular motion without centripetal    

   14 Jan 19 08:26:28   

   2k   

   16418   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Circular motion without centripetal forc   

   13 Jan 19 22:23:43   

   1,905b   

   16417   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: physical status of something "comput   

   13 Jan 19 15:46:42   

   2k   

   16416   

   Lawrence Crowell to toadast...@gmail.com   

   Re: physical status of something "comput   

   12 Jan 19 23:59:13   

   1k   

   16415   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Corollary to the principles of dynam   

   12 Jan 19 11:21:44   

   1k   

   16414   

   Augustin Coppey to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Corollary to the principles of dynam   

   12 Jan 19 09:20:57   

   1k   

   16413   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Corollary to the principles of dynamics   

   11 Jan 19 23:50:34   

   1,327b   

   16412   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   physical status of something "computable   

   08 Jan 19 23:49:50   

   1,327b   

   16411   

   Sabbir Rahman to All   

   Spacetime branching in gravitational col   

   04 Jan 19 07:41:13   

   1k   

   16410   

   Darshan Beniwal to Robert L. Oldershaw   

   Re: suggest me name of cosmology society   

   03 Jan 19 08:02:54   

   1,265b   

   16409   

   Robert L. Oldershaw to Darshan Beniwal   

   Re: suggest me name of cosmology society   

   02 Jan 19 21:18:07   

   1,265b   

   16408   

   Darshan Beniwal to All   

   suggest me name of cosmology society   

   01 Jan 19 13:39:44   

   1,265b   

   16407   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   administrivia: email addresses and rejec   

   18 Dec 18 05:52:52   

   1,265b   

   16406   

   Lawrence Crowell to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   06 Dec 18 16:02:42   

   2k   

   16405   

   Jos Bergervoet to richalivingston@gmail.com   

   Re: Cesium 133   

   23 Nov 18 01:28:05   

   2k   

   16404   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Michael Cole   

   Re: Cesium 133   

   18 Nov 18 19:05:21   

   2,427b   

   16403   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Michael Cole   

   Re: Cesium 133   

   18 Nov 18 19:05:03   

   2k   

   16402   

   ian Gay to Michael Cole   

   Re: Cesium 133   

   18 Nov 18 19:03:52   

   2,105b   

   16401   

   Michael Cole to All   

   Cesium 133   

   17 Nov 18 16:50:08   

   2,105b   

   16400   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to bergervo@iae.nl   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   15 Nov 18 12:01:16   

   1k   

   16399   

   Jos Bergervoet to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   15 Nov 18 09:42:08   

   2k   

   16398   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   07 Nov 18 21:06:02   

   3k   

   16397   

   Sabbir Rahman to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   04 Nov 18 08:50:29   

   4k   

   16396   

   Sabbir Rahman to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   04 Nov 18 08:50:29   

   1k   

   16395   

   Lawrence Crowell to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   03 Nov 18 11:26:23   

   3k   

   16394   

   Sabbir Rahman to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   03 Nov 18 11:26:11   

   7k   

   16393   

   Sabbir Rahman to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   03 Nov 18 11:01:07   

   7k   

   16392   

   Tom Roberts to ben6993@hotmail.com   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   03 Nov 18 10:46:00   

   3k   

   16391   

   Jos Bergervoet to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   03 Nov 18 10:45:47   

   4k   

   16390   

   Sabbir Rahman to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   03 Nov 18 10:57:54   

   2k   

   16389   

   Lawrence Crowell to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   02 Nov 18 14:25:31   

   1k   

   16388   

   Libor Striz to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re:The rotor   

   02 Nov 18 06:25:00   

   1,266b   

   16387   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   02 Nov 18 06:24:00   

   1,266b   

   16386   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The rotor   

   01 Nov 18 22:22:25   

   1,266b   

   16385   

   Tom Roberts to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   01 Nov 18 22:21:55   

   4k   

   16384   

   Sabbir Rahman to All   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   01 Nov 18 14:23:25   

   4k   

   16383   

   Sabbir Rahman to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   01 Nov 18 13:53:27   

   3k   

   16382   

   Jos Bergervoet to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   01 Nov 18 08:30:01   

   2k   

   16381   

   Sabbir Rahman to All   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   30 Oct 18 23:05:03   

   7k   

   16380   

   Jos Bergervoet to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   28 Oct 18 17:32:13   

   3k   

   16379   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   28 Oct 18 17:31:43   

   2,789b   

   16378   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Phillip Helbig   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   27 Oct 18 09:59:23   

   5k   

   16377   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   23 Oct 18 16:20:14   

   2k   

   16376   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Phillip Helbig   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   20 Oct 18 13:22:15   

   5k   

   16375   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   20 Oct 18 15:02:32   

   2k   

   16374   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   16 Oct 18 11:28:41   

   3k   

   16373   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   16 Oct 18 13:47:04   

   3k   

   16372   

   Lawrence Crowell to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   15 Oct 18 23:58:51   

   4k   

   16371   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Phillip Helbig   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   15 Oct 18 20:56:09   

   2k   

   16370   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   13 Oct 18 17:53:11   

   2,074b   

   16369   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Quantum puzzle baffles physicists.   

   13 Oct 18 15:56:43   

   2k   

   16368   

   jnleonrd@gmail.com to All   

   Quantum gravity   

   12 Oct 18 23:00:40   

   1,688b   

   16367   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   09 Oct 18 19:14:37   

   3k   

   16366   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   09 Oct 18 09:35:03   

   2k   

   16365   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   08 Oct 18 10:37:13   

   1k   

   16364   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   02 Oct 18 06:35:34   

   2k   

   16363   

   Tom Roberts to richalivingston@gmail.com   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   02 Oct 18 07:35:05   

   4k   

   16362   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   30 Sep 18 07:15:19   

   4k   

   16361   

   Lawrence Crowell to jacque...@neuf.fr   

   Re: general relativity, comparison of th   

   29 Sep 18 18:41:02   

   2k   

   16360   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: general relativity, comparison of th   

   27 Sep 18 11:34:26   

   4k   

   16359   

   jacques.fric@neuf.fr to All   

   general relativity, comparison of the re   

   27 Sep 18 06:04:28   

   3,754b   

   16358   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   26 Sep 18 11:42:01   

   4k   

   16357   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   23 Sep 18 22:57:16   

   3k   

   16356   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The behaviour of a clock in a linear   

   18 Sep 18 21:11:08   

   2k   

   16355   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The cyclist   

   04 Sep 18 22:54:32   

   1,773b   

   16354   

   Pettersen,Roald to All   

   Re: The cyclist   

   04 Sep 18 22:54:02   

   2k   

   16353   

   Richard Isakson to All   

   Re: The cyclist   

   04 Sep 18 09:41:36   

   1,552b   

   16352   

   Pettersen,Roald to All   

   Re: The cyclist   

   03 Sep 18 18:39:53   

   1,552b   

   16351   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Isakson   

   Re: The cyclist   

   03 Sep 18 17:36:28   

   1,552b   

   16350   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The cyclist   

   03 Sep 18 06:01:34   

   2k   

   16349   

   Richard Isakson to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The cyclist   

   03 Sep 18 06:01:34   

   1,544b   

   16348   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to roald@nomail.invalid   

   Re: The cyclist   

   02 Sep 18 12:17:31   

   1k   

   16347   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: The cyclist   

   02 Sep 18 12:17:07   

   2k   

   16346   

   Pettersen,Roald to All   

   Re: The cyclist   

   02 Sep 18 15:05:11   

   1,705b   

   16345   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The cyclist   

   02 Sep 18 07:06:57   

   1,705b   

   16344   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   02 Sep 18 00:05:02   

   1k   

   16343   

   Lawrence Crowell to All   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   01 Sep 18 10:30:10   

   1k   

   16342   

   Lawrence Crowell to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   25 Aug 18 21:49:16   

   2k   

   16341   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   24 Aug 18 17:03:06   

   1k   

   16340   

   Gregor Scholten to Y Porat   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   19 Aug 18 10:04:42   

   4k   

   16339   

   Lawrence Crowell to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   18 Aug 18 21:52:09   

   2k   

   16338   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   18 Aug 18 21:51:06   

   2,480b   

   16337   

   Gregor Scholten to Y Porat   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   18 Aug 18 12:35:09   

   1k   

   16336   

   Gregor Scholten to Y Porat   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   18 Aug 18 12:07:22   

   7k   

   16335   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   18 Aug 18 08:00:05   

   6k   

   16334   

   Lawrence Crowell to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   18 Aug 18 08:41:16   

   3k   

   16333   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to ben6993@hotmail.com   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   17 Aug 18 00:07:33   

   2k   

   16332   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The sprinter   

   16 Aug 18 11:45:40   

   1k   

   16331   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Dark energy, dark matter and negativ   

   16 Aug 18 11:34:33   

   2k   

   16330   

   Y Porat to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   14 Aug 18 22:19:12   

   2k   

   16329   

   Y Porat to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   13 Aug 18 18:36:50   

   1k   

   16328   

   Gregor Scholten to Y Porat   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   13 Aug 18 18:34:06   

   1,263b   

   16327   

   Gregor Scholten to Y Porat   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   11 Aug 18 15:43:38   

   1,263b   

   16326   

   Y Porat to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   11 Aug 18 15:18:13   

   3k   

   16325   

   Lawrence Crowell to Y Porat   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   11 Aug 18 07:59:58   

   2k   

   16324   

   Y Porat to Y Porat   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   10 Aug 18 08:24:23   

   2,505b   

   16323   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to John Heath   

   Re: The weight in the elevator   

   07 Aug 18 10:13:28   

   2k   

   16322   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: The weight in the elevator   

   07 Aug 18 10:13:04   

   1,830b   

   16321   

   Y Porat to Y Porat   

   Re: Does 'dark matter' has different den   

   07 Aug 18 10:12:46   

   1,830b   

   16320   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The weight in the elevator   

   07 Aug 18 07:04:39   

   1,830b   

   16319   

   Y Porat to All   

   Does 'dark matter' has different densiti   

   07 Aug 18 07:04:39   

   1,830b   

   16318   

   John Heath to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The weight in the elevator   

   07 Aug 18 07:04:39   

   3k   

   16317   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The weight in the elevator   

   06 Aug 18 19:11:24   

   1k   

   16316   

   Tom Roberts to Sylvia Else   

   Re: The weight in the elevator   

   06 Aug 18 07:26:37   

   2k   

   16315   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The weight in the elevator   

   05 Aug 18 22:29:01   

   3k   

   16314   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The weight in the elevator   

   05 Aug 18 08:01:32   

   2k   

   16313   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The weight in the elevator   

   04 Aug 18 22:24:15   

   2,240b   

   16312   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: The weight in the elevator   

   04 Aug 18 22:24:04   

   2k   

   16311   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The weight in the elevator   

   05 Aug 18 01:28:04   

   1,924b   

   16310   

   ross.finlayson@gmail.com to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: Expanding universe   

   31 Jul 18 08:18:28   

   3k   

   16309   

   Bob to toadast...@gmail.com   

   Re: gamma factor in special relativity   

   29 Jul 18 23:28:11   

   3,278b   

   16308   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "net" force   

   29 Jul 18 23:27:39   

   3,278b   

   16307   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   gamma factor in special relativity   

   29 Jul 18 09:54:54   

   3,278b   

   16306   

   Lawrence Crowell to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "net" force   

   29 Jul 18 09:54:54   

   1k   

   16305   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The "net" force   

   28 Jul 18 16:24:36   

   1,291b   

   16304   

   Gregor Scholten to jmreno   

   Re: Expanding universe   

   28 Jul 18 13:42:19   

   3k   

   16303   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "net" force   

   28 Jul 18 13:42:19   

   1k   

   16302   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The "net" force   

   27 Jul 18 21:05:09   

   1,277b   

   16301   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: Expanding universe   

   24 Jul 18 14:30:31   

   3k   

   16300   

   jmreno to The guy on the Internet   

   Re: Expanding universe   

   23 Jul 18 22:59:48   

   2,671b   

   16299   

   Edward Prochak to The guy on the Internet   

   Re: Expanding universe   

   23 Jul 18 22:55:41   

   2,671b   

   16298   

   The guy on the Internet to All   

   Expanding universe   

   23 Jul 18 09:24:24   

   2,671b   

   16297   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   Re: The evanescent wave at the detector.   

   23 Jul 18 09:23:54   

   5k   

   16296   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to mt2.1.4-37743-1532045466@iron.astro   

   Moderator's Note: this thread is now clo   

   19 Jul 18 17:26:09   

   1k   

   16295   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to All   

   Moderator's Note: this thread is now clo   

   19 Jul 18 17:11:07   

   1k   

   16294   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   19 Jul 18 17:04:58   

   4k   

   16293   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The spring between the little trains   

   19 Jul 18 00:01:24   

   4,053b   

   16292   

   Lawrence Crowell to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: Metric tensor transformed into momen   

   17 Jul 18 13:00:48   

   2k   

   16291   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   17 Jul 18 12:55:27   

   5k   

   16290   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The spring between the little trains   

   17 Jul 18 12:35:08   

   4,884b   

   16289   

   mrios@ing.puc.cl to All   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   16 Jul 18 15:20:56   

   2k   

   16288   

   Edward Prochak to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: Higgs and Aether   

   15 Jul 18 22:44:09   

   3k   

   16287   

   Edward Prochak to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   15 Jul 18 22:43:28   

   3k   

   16286   

   Torn Rumero DeBrak to All   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   15 Jul 18 22:36:19   

   4k   

   16285   

   fnmfnm2@gmail.com to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: Metric tensor transformed into momen   

   15 Jul 18 22:35:55   

   4,163b   

   16284   

   fnmfnm2@gmail.com to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: Metric tensor transformed into momen   

   15 Jul 18 22:35:55   

   7k   

   16283   

   Michael Cole to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Higgs and Aether   

   15 Jul 18 22:32:58   

   2k   

   16282   

   Ed Lake to mr...@ing.puc.cl   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   15 Jul 18 22:30:38   

   4k   

   16281   

   Lawrence Crowell to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Higgs and Aether   

   15 Jul 18 18:23:48   

   3k   

   16280   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The spring between the little trains   

   15 Jul 18 18:22:04   

   2,561b   

   16279   

   mrios@ing.puc.cl to All   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   15 Jul 18 18:55:34   

   3k   

   16278   

   Steven Carlip to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   15 Jul 18 08:47:37   

   2,799b   

   16277   

   Ed Lake to mr...@ing.puc.cl   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   15 Jul 18 08:47:35   

   3k   

   16276   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: Completed Dirac-Klauza-Klein Paper,    

   15 Jul 18 08:47:32   

   1k   

   16275   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The spring between the little trains   

   14 Jul 18 22:18:26   

   1,231b   

   16274   

   mrios@ing.puc.cl to All   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   14 Jul 18 16:40:16   

   3k   

   16273   

   Ed Lake to mr...@ing.puc.cl   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   14 Jul 18 16:17:38   

   3k   

   16272   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   14 Jul 18 16:17:38   

   5k   

   16271   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The spring between the little trains   

   14 Jul 18 14:06:50   

   4,653b   

   16270   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   14 Jul 18 12:55:55   

   4,653b   

   16269   

   Edward Prochak to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The spring between the little trains   

   13 Jul 18 23:05:26   

   2k   

   16268   

   Gregor Scholten to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Higgs and Aether   

   13 Jul 18 18:34:21   

   3k   

   16267   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Higgs and Aether   

   13 Jul 18 18:34:11   

   3,162b   

   16266   

   Ed Lake to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   13 Jul 18 21:45:14   

   3k   

   16265   

   Michael Cole to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Higgs and Aether   

   13 Jul 18 21:45:13   

   2k   

   16264   

   mrios@ing.puc.cl to All   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   13 Jul 18 21:45:13   

   3k   

   16263   

   Gregor Scholten to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   13 Jul 18 13:41:51   

   6k   

   16262   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   13 Jul 18 13:41:51   

   6,395b   

   16261   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   13 Jul 18 13:41:51   

   6,395b   

   16260   

   Edward Prochak to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   12 Jul 18 22:10:45   

   5k   

   16259   

   Edward Prochak to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   12 Jul 18 22:10:01   

   2k   

   16258   

   Edward Prochak to All   

   Higgs and Aether   

   12 Jul 18 22:08:57   

   1,874b   

   16257   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   12 Jul 18 22:08:16   

   3k   

   16256   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   12 Jul 18 22:07:42   

   4k   

   16255   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The spring between the little trains   

   12 Jul 18 22:07:16   

   1k   

   16254   

   Ed Lake to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   11 Jul 18 18:31:32   

   4k   

   16253   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   11 Jul 18 17:57:16   

   5k   

   16252   

   Steven Carlip to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   11 Jul 18 20:08:16   

   3k   

   16251   

   Ed Lake to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   11 Jul 18 05:56:06   

   5k   

   16250   

   Edward Prochak to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   10 Jul 18 18:56:32   

   4k   

   16249   

   Edward Prochak to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   10 Jul 18 18:56:01   

   2k   

   16248   

   Gregor Scholten to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   10 Jul 18 14:22:15   

   1k   

   16247   

   Ed Lake to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   10 Jul 18 07:32:59   

   4k   

   16246   

   Edward Prochak to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   10 Jul 18 07:32:59   

   5k   

   16245   

   Tom Roberts to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   10 Jul 18 07:32:59   

   3k   

   16244   

   Tom Roberts to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   10 Jul 18 07:32:59   

   2k   

   16243   

   Edward Prochak to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   09 Jul 18 19:48:04   

   1k   

   16242   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   09 Jul 18 19:47:04   

   2k   

   16241   

   Thomas Koenig to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: A possible solution to the problem o   

   09 Jul 18 19:46:34   

   2,256b   

   16240   

   Ed Lake to All   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   09 Jul 18 19:46:03   

   1k   

   16239   

   Ed Lake to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   07 Jul 18 18:35:38   

   3k   

   16238   

   Ed Lake to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   07 Jul 18 18:33:52   

   7k   

   16237   

   Tom Roberts to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   07 Jul 18 00:38:30   

   3k   

   16236   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   The evanescent wave at the detector. Wha   

   06 Jul 18 14:34:52   

   5k   

   16235   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   06 Jul 18 14:34:52   

   4k   

   16234   

   Gregor Scholten to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   06 Jul 18 14:34:52   

   3k   

   16233   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The spring between the little trains   

   05 Jul 18 21:47:48   

   3,119b   

   16232   

   Edward Prochak to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   04 Jul 18 17:21:49   

   5k   

   16231   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net   

   Re: A possible solution to the problem o   

   04 Jul 18 17:21:32   

   2k   

   16230   

   Ed Lake to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   03 Jul 18 18:34:09   

   7k   

   16229   

   Ed Lake to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   03 Jul 18 18:34:09   

   5k   

   16228   

   Tom Roberts to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: A possible solution to the problem o   

   03 Jul 18 07:29:47   

   1k   

   16227   

   Tom Roberts to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   03 Jul 18 07:29:46   

   6k   

   16226   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   02 Jul 18 21:49:58   

   3k   

   16225   

   Edward Prochak to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   02 Jul 18 21:49:26   

   3k   

   16224   

   Michael Cole to All   

   Re: The gravitational attraction of an i   

   02 Jul 18 21:49:00   

   3,543b   

   16223   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to R. Yablon"   

   Re: A possible solution to the problem o   

   02 Jul 18 07:22:25   

   1k   

   16222   

   Jay R. Yablon to All   

   Re: A possible solution to the problem o   

   02 Jul 18 06:07:00   

   1,306b   

   16221   

   Ed Lake to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   01 Jul 18 20:52:37   

   5k   

   16220   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   01 Jul 18 18:39:19   

   3k   

   16219   

   Tom Roberts to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   01 Jul 18 15:28:58   

   3k   

   16218   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to R. Yablon"   

   Re: A possible solution to the problem o   

   01 Jul 18 12:07:35   

   2k   

   16217   

   Tom Roberts to John Heath   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   29 Jun 18 22:32:29   

   1k   

   16216   

   Ed Lake to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   29 Jun 18 22:32:28   

   3k   

   16215   

   John Heath to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   29 Jun 18 07:27:59   

   3k   

   16214   

   Tom Roberts to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   29 Jun 18 07:27:59   

   3k   

   16213   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   29 Jun 18 07:27:59   

   1k   

   16212   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   29 Jun 18 07:27:58   

   1,262b   

   16211   

   kunz to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: Completed Dirac-Klauza-Klein Paper,    

   28 Jun 18 21:54:55   

   1,262b   

   16210   

   Tom Roberts to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   26 Jun 18 12:13:12   

   2k   

   16209   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Ed Lake   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   24 Jun 18 15:12:33   

   2k   

   16208   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   24 Jun 18 15:12:32   

   3k   

   16207   

   Gregor Scholten to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   24 Jun 18 15:29:56   

   2k   

   16206   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to All   

   Re: Moderator's Note: thread is now clos   

   23 Jun 18 21:56:10   

   2k   

   16205   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to All   

   Moderator's Note: thread is now closed   

   23 Jun 18 21:37:38   

   1k   

   16204   

   Dirk Van de moortel to All   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   23 Jun 18 21:37:16   

   2k   

   16203   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   23 Jun 18 18:08:40   

   2k   

   16202   

   Gregor Scholten to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The tower of the twins   

   23 Jun 18 18:08:40   

   3k   

   16201   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The tower of the twins   

   23 Jun 18 11:46:04   

   3k   

   16200   

   Ed Lake to richali...@gmail.com   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   23 Jun 18 11:15:12   

   2k   

   16199   

   Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   21 Jun 18 07:11:41   

   2k   

   16198   

   Sabbir Rahman to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   20 Jun 18 16:42:30   

   5k   

   16197   

   Sabbir Rahman to Steven Carlip   

   Some questions regarding inertial, activ   

   20 Jun 18 05:37:27   

   5,183b   

   16196   

   Sabbir Rahman to Steven Carlip   

   Some questions regarding inertial, activ   

   20 Jun 18 05:37:27   

   7k   

   16195   

   Steven Carlip to Michael Cole   

   Re: The gravitational attraction of an i   

   19 Jun 18 07:34:46   

   2k   

   16194   

   Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   19 Jun 18 07:34:46   

   2k   

   16193   

   Michael Cole to All   

   The gravitational attraction of an infin   

   18 Jun 18 21:01:54   

   2,136b   

   16192   

   Sabbir Rahman to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   18 Jun 18 08:27:20   

   7k   

   16191   

   Sabbir Rahman to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   17 Jun 18 19:31:40   

   6,933b   

   16190   

   Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   17 Jun 18 19:31:33   

   7k   

   16189   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   How to? Detecting a detector in the act    

   17 Jun 18 13:10:34   

   6,866b   

   16188   

   Sabbir Rahman to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   16 Jun 18 18:38:48   

   7k   

   16187   

   John Heath to All   

   The gravitational attraction of an infin   

   16 Jun 18 18:38:17   

   6,757b   

   16186   

   Michael Cole to All   

   The gravitational attraction of an infin   

   15 Jun 18 22:06:39   

   6,757b   

   16185   

   Lawrence Crowell to Michael Cole   

   Re: The gravitational attraction of an i   

   15 Jun 18 13:54:29   

   2k   

   16184   

   Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   15 Jun 18 08:41:46   

   6k   

   16183   

   Sabbir Rahman to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   14 Jun 18 10:38:45   

   6k   

   16182   

   Michael Cole to All   

   The gravitational attraction of an infin   

   14 Jun 18 10:37:29   

   1k   

   16181   

   Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   14 Jun 18 07:25:57   

   1k   

   16180   

   Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   14 Jun 18 07:25:27   

   5k   

   16179   

   Jay R. Yablon to All   

   Re: New_Paper_for_comment: "Grounding_th   

   13 Jun 18 16:13:52   

   3k   

   16178   

   Sabbir Rahman to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   13 Jun 18 16:13:37   

   3k   

   16177   

   Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   13 Jun 18 01:09:40   

   7k   

   16176   

   Sabbir Rahman to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   12 Jun 18 21:08:42   

   7k   

   16175   

   Sabbir Rahman to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   12 Jun 18 11:59:27   

   4k   

   16174   

   Jonathan Thornburg to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   12 Jun 18 11:57:48   

   3k   

   16173   

   Jos Bergervoet to Jonathan Thornburg   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   12 Jun 18 11:57:10   

   2k   

   16172   

   Jonathan Thornburg to All   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   12 Jun 18 09:22:07   

   4k   

   16171   

   Sabbir Rahman to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   12 Jun 18 10:51:59   

   3k   

   16170   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to All   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   12 Jun 18 07:43:34   

   7k   

   16169   

   Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   12 Jun 18 07:43:34   

   7k   

   16168   

   Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   12 Jun 18 00:22:39   

   7k   

   16167   

   Sabbir Rahman to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   11 Jun 18 23:22:49   

   7k   

   16166   

   Lawrence Crowell to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   11 Jun 18 23:19:39   

   3k   

   16165   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Re: New_Paper_for_comment: "Grounding_th   

   11 Jun 18 23:16:25   

   3,514b   

   16164   

   Jay R. Yablon to All   

   Re: New_Paper_for_comment: "Grounding_th   

   11 Jun 18 23:16:09   

   3,514b   

   16163   

   Sabbir Rahman to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   11 Jun 18 14:32:43   

   3,514b   

   16162   

   Gregor Scholten to Sabbir Rahman   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   11 Jun 18 14:04:16   

   2k   

   16161   

   Hendrik van Hees to All   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   10 Jun 18 09:59:11   

   4k   

   16160   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Re: New_Paper_for_comment: "Grounding_th   

   10 Jun 18 07:36:23   

   3,621b   

   16159   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   Re: A question about spherical gravitati   

   10 Jun 18 07:36:23   

   2k   

   16158   

   Douglas Dana Goncz to All   

   Re: P.H. Comment on "Confocal vs Unifoca   

   09 Jun 18 09:37:53   

   2k   

   16157   

   intuitionist1@gmail.com to All   

   A question about spherical gravitational   

   07 Jun 18 17:45:28   

   7k   

   16156   

   d.oprisa@gmail.com to Jason   

   Re: Why symmetry groups, not symmetry gr   

   07 Jun 18 17:12:36   

   2k   

   16155   

   Lawrence Crowell to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: What effects on unitarity if BH Page   

   02 Jun 18 09:16:00   

   1,771b   

   16154   

   Lawrence Crowell to stargene   

   Re: What effects on unitarity if BH Page   

   27 May 18 19:57:45   

   2k   

   16153   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to stargene   

   Re: What effects on unitarity if BH Page   

   27 May 18 12:58:46   

   2k   

   16152   

   stargene to All   

   What effects on unitarity if BH Page Tim   

   27 May 18 10:38:37   

   1,931b   

   16151   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Re: New draft paper for comment: Relatio   

   24 May 18 06:29:24   

   1,931b   

   16150   

   Jos Bergervoet to Steven Carlip   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   20 May 18 15:40:37   

   7k   

   16149   

   Steven Carlip to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   18 May 18 07:17:59   

   4k   

   16148   

   Torn Rumero DeBrak to All   

   Re: Simplifying Einstein's Thought Exper   

   16 May 18 13:34:24   

   3,789b   

   16147   

   Ed Lake to All   

   Simplifying Einstein's Thought Experimen   

   15 May 18 20:12:04   

   3,789b   

   16146   

   Lawrence Crowell to Keith Stein   

   Re: Flat orbital velocity profiles of sp   

   15 May 18 07:34:56   

   3k   

   16145   

   Y Porat to Y Porat   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   15 May 18 00:11:00   

   2k   

   16144   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to keithstein111@gmail.com   

   Re: Flat orbital velocity profiles of sp   

   13 May 18 14:00:33   

   1k   

   16143   

   Keith Stein to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Flat orbital velocity profiles of sp   

   13 May 18 10:23:21   

   3k   

   16142   

   Gregor Scholten to All   

   Lorentz contraction of a rotated rod   

   12 May 18 22:22:35   

   2k   

   16141   

   Dan Riley to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   11 May 18 17:12:43   

   2,450b   

   16140   

   Jay R. Yablon to All   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   11 May 18 08:55:17   

   6k   

   16139   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to All   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   09 May 18 23:07:51   

   1k   

   16138   

   Jay R. Yablon to Steven Carlip   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation (   

   09 May 18 14:27:58   

   7k   

   16137   

   Jos Bergervoet to Steven Carlip   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   08 May 18 14:21:29   

   2k   

   16136   

   John Heath to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: Draft Paper for comment: Quantum The   

   08 May 18 14:21:29   

   1,966b   

   16135   

   Steven Carlip to All   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   06 May 18 22:33:16   

   2k   

   16134   

   Steven Carlip to SEKI   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   06 May 18 22:32:32   

   3k   

   16133   

   Steven Carlip to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   06 May 18 20:36:14   

   2k   

   16132   

   Keith Stein to All   

   Re: Flat orbital velocity profiles of sp   

   05 May 18 23:57:23   

   2k   

   16131   

   Lawrence Crowell to Keith Stein   

   Re: Flat orbital velocity profiles of sp   

   05 May 18 23:57:07   

   3k   

   16130   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   05 May 18 23:06:59   

   2k   

   16129   

   Hannu Poropudas to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: Draft Paper for comment: Quantum The   

   05 May 18 23:02:03   

   2k   

   16128   

   SEKI to Steven Carlip   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   05 May 18 15:50:20   

   2k   

   16127   

   Jay R. Yablon to All   

   A question about Hawking radiation   

   05 May 18 06:54:52   

   3k   

   16126   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Robert L. Oldershaw   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   04 May 18 07:59:18   

   1k   

   16125   

   Jos Bergervoet to Robert L. Oldershaw   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   04 May 18 07:59:17   

   1k   

   16124   

   Steven Carlip to SEKI   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   04 May 18 07:59:17   

   2k   

   16123   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Robert L. Oldershaw   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   03 May 18 23:10:09   

   1,643b   

   16122   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   Re: Flat orbital velocity profiles of sp   

   03 May 18 19:18:57   

   1,643b   

   16121   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to keithstein111@gmail.com   

   Re: Flat orbital velocity profiles of sp   

   03 May 18 07:03:57   

   1k   

   16120   

   Robert L. Oldershaw to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   03 May 18 07:52:17   

   1k   

   16119   

   SEKI to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   02 May 18 22:39:56   

   1k   

   16118   

   Keith Stein to All   

   Flat orbital velocity profiles of spiral   

   02 May 18 11:50:06   

   1,259b   

   16117   

   Jos Bergervoet to Robert L. Oldershaw   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   02 May 18 13:17:13   

   2k   

   16116   

   Jay R. Yablon to All   

   Re: Draft Paper for comment: Quantum The   

   02 May 18 13:16:34   

   1,755b   

   16115   

   Robert L. Oldershaw to SEKI   

   Re: A question about Hawking radiation   

   02 May 18 05:33:32   

   1,755b   

   16114   

   SEKI to All   

   A question about Hawking radiation   

   01 May 18 21:41:50   

   1,755b   

   16113   

   Lawrence Crowell to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: Draft Paper for comment: Quantum The   

   01 May 18 08:08:24   

   2k   

   16112   

   Libor P Striz to All   

   Re: The spring and the third principle   

   13 Apr 18 18:34:25   

   1,627b   

   16111   

   Libor Striz to All   

   Re: The spring and the third principle   

   13 Apr 18 12:33:31   

   2k   

   16110   

   Y Porat to Y Porat   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   13 Apr 18 12:33:13   

   2k   

   16109   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Plasma under Coulomb magnetic force   

   13 Apr 18 02:14:22   

   1,761b   

   16108   

   Augustin Coppey to All   

   Re: The spring and the third principle   

   13 Apr 18 02:11:08   

   1,761b   

   16107   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The spring and the third principle   

   12 Apr 18 17:46:45   

   2k   

   16106   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The spring and the third principle   

   12 Apr 18 08:03:39   

   1k   

   16105   

   Libor Striz to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re:The spring and the third principle   

   11 Apr 18 23:06:50   

   2k   

   16104   

   John Heath to All   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   11 Apr 18 23:06:31   

   1,650b   

   16103   

   Gary Harnagel to Libor Striz   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   11 Apr 18 23:03:37   

   1,650b   

   16102   

   Y Porat to Arindam Banerjee   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   11 Apr 18 23:03:27   

   1k   

   16101   

   Dan Riley to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   11 Apr 18 18:09:17   

   1k   

   16100   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The spring and the third principle   

   11 Apr 18 18:09:17   

   2k   

   16099   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The spring and the third principle   

   10 Apr 18 21:55:38   

   1,765b   

   16098   

   Thomas Koenig to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The tires on the asphalt   

   09 Apr 18 22:38:07   

   2k   

   16097   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   08 Apr 18 19:22:27   

   2,346b   

   16096   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   09 Apr 18 05:29:34   

   2,346b   

   16095   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   08 Apr 18 23:24:01   

   2,346b   

   16094   

   Libor Striz to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   08 Apr 18 21:01:16   

   2,346b   

   16093   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The tires on the asphalt   

   08 Apr 18 20:23:17   

   2k   

   16092   

   Libor Striz to Gary Harnagel   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   08 Apr 18 20:17:53   

   2,528b   

   16091   

   John Heath to Gary Harnagel   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   08 Apr 18 20:17:40   

   2k   

   16090   

   Jonathan Thornburg to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   08 Apr 18 20:13:55   

   5k   

   16089   

   John Heath to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   08 Apr 18 05:12:29   

   4k   

   16088   

   Edward Prochak to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   07 Apr 18 23:29:27   

   3k   

   16087   

   Gary Harnagel to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   07 Apr 18 23:26:13   

   1k   

   16086   

   Libor Striz to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   07 Apr 18 23:25:41   

   1,237b   

   16085   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The tires on the asphalt   

   07 Apr 18 23:24:36   

   1k   

   16084   

   John Heath to Gary Harnagel   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   05 Apr 18 07:20:07   

   1,053b   

   16083   

   Edward Prochak to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The tires on the asphalt   

   04 Apr 18 11:27:57   

   2k   

   16082   

   Lawrence Crowell to rockbr...@gmail.com   

   Re: Existence of CMB and early radiation   

   04 Apr 18 11:27:17   

   1k   

   16081   

   Thomas Koenig to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The tires on the asphalt   

   04 Apr 18 07:35:02   

   1k   

   16080   

   John Heath to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   04 Apr 18 07:35:03   

   4k   

   16079   

   Edward Prochak to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   03 Apr 18 14:02:31   

   3k   

   16078   

   Gary Harnagel to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   03 Apr 18 12:05:25   

   2,645b   

   16077   

   John Heath to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   03 Apr 18 10:50:24   

   6k   

   16076   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to lydiamarie...@gmail.com   

   Re: Existence of CMB and early radiation   

   03 Apr 18 07:13:28   

   4k   

   16075   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The tires on the asphalt   

   03 Apr 18 07:12:31   

   1k   

   16074   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Existence of CMB and early radiation   

   03 Apr 18 07:12:30   

   2k   

   16073   

   Mike Fontenot to Michael Cole   

   Re: Elementary Textbook Clarification   

   03 Apr 18 07:12:30   

   2k   

   16072   

   Edward Prochak to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   02 Apr 18 21:21:43   

   4k   

   16071   

   Michael Cole to All   

   Elementary Textbook Clarification   

   02 Apr 18 21:21:43   

   2k   

   16070   

   Lawrence Crowell to stargene   

   Re: Gravitation viz the CFT boundary?   

   01 Apr 18 16:44:46   

   1k   

   16069   

   Thomas Koenig to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The tires on the asphalt   

   31 Mar 18 12:57:29   

   1k   

   16068   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Elementary Textbook Clarification   

   30 Mar 18 23:40:04   

   1k   

   16067   

   Ifrit to J.B. Wood   

   Re: Elementary Textbook Clarification   

   30 Mar 18 23:39:17   

   1,248b   

   16066   

   stargene to All   

   Gravitation viz the CFT boundary?   

   30 Mar 18 07:01:31   

   1,248b   

   16065   

   Mike Fontenot to J.B. Wood   

   Re: Elementary Textbook Clarification   

   30 Mar 18 06:59:42   

   1k   

   16064   

   J.B. Wood to All   

   Elementary Textbook Clarification   

   29 Mar 18 10:20:20   

   1,419b   

   16063   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Coulomb magnetic force   

   29 Mar 18 07:30:48   

   1,419b   

   16062   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The tires on the asphalt   

   28 Mar 18 18:56:44   

   1,419b   

   16061   

   Lawrence Crowell to rockbr...@gmail.com   

   Re: Existence of CMB and early radiation   

   28 Mar 18 06:38:07   

   5k   

   16060   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Existence of CMB and early radiation   

   27 Mar 18 20:28:04   

   4k   

   16059   

   richard miller to lydiamarie...@gmail.com   

   Re: Existence of CMB and early radiation   

   24 Mar 18 00:52:09   

   4,250b   

   16058   

   John Heath to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   24 Mar 18 00:51:21   

   6k   

   16057   

   Lawrence Crowell to All   

   Re: Existence of CMB and early radiation   

   21 Mar 18 13:01:40   

   3k   

   16056   

   Edward Prochak to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   21 Mar 18 13:00:02   

   4k   

   16055   

   John Heath to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: the limits c   

   20 Mar 18 14:35:00   

   3k   

   16054   

   Lawrence Crowell to John Heath   

   Re: the limits c   

   20 Mar 18 13:14:24   

   2k   

   16053   

   lydiamariewilliamson@gmail.com to All   

   Existence of CMB and early radiation dom   

   20 Mar 18 13:09:36   

   7k   

   16052   

   John Heath to John Heath   

   Re: the limits c   

   19 Mar 18 10:58:50   

   2k   

   16051   

   SEKI to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   16 Mar 18 17:24:16   

   1k   

   16050   

   John Heath to R.T.   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   16 Mar 18 13:05:40   

   2k   

   16049   

   Giorgio Pastore to All   

   Re: new type of matter   

   11 Mar 18 16:52:08   

   2,295b   

   16048   

   John Heath to Edward Prochak   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   09 Mar 18 07:59:48   

   4k   

   16047   

   Edward Prochak to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   07 Mar 18 18:35:42   

   3k   

   16046   

   JTS to All   

   Re: new type of matter   

   06 Mar 18 20:50:23   

   2,882b   

   16045   

   Lawrence Crowell to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: page time and quantum error correcti   

   06 Mar 18 18:19:21   

   5k   

   16044   

   Sylvia Else to richalivingston@gmail.com   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   04 Mar 18 10:51:21   

   1k   

   16043   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: page time and quantum error correcti   

   04 Mar 18 09:50:33   

   3k   

   16042   

   Jos Bergervoet to richalivingston@gmail.com   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   03 Mar 18 12:26:54   

   4k   

   16041   

   Lawrence Crowell to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: page time and quantum error correcti   

   03 Mar 18 12:26:37   

   3k   

   16040   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   03 Mar 18 08:47:03   

   3k   

   16039   

   Jos Bergervoet to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: page time and quantum error correcti   

   01 Mar 18 06:23:22   

   2k   

   16038   

   SEKI to Tom Roberts   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   28 Feb 18 20:35:18   

   1k   

   16037   

   John Heath to All   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   28 Feb 18 21:32:20   

   2k   

   16036   

   Lawrence Crowell to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: page time and quantum error correcti   

   28 Feb 18 21:24:53   

   5k   

   16035   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   28 Feb 18 08:33:26   

   2k   

   16034   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Tom Roberts   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   27 Feb 18 18:12:11   

   1k   

   16033   

   Libor Striz to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   27 Feb 18 18:11:41   

   4k   

   16032   

   Jos Bergervoet to Tom Roberts   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   27 Feb 18 18:10:41   

   2k   

   16031   

   John Heath to All   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   26 Feb 18 19:32:18   

   3k   

   16030   

   Tom Roberts to richalivingston@gmail.com   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   27 Feb 18 04:58:42   

   3,238b   

   16029   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: page time and quantum error correcti   

   26 Feb 18 15:33:39   

   4k   

   16028   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   26 Feb 18 15:33:08   

   2k   

   16027   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   26 Feb 18 15:05:37   

   3k   

   16026   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: Fwd: Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bel   

   25 Feb 18 22:54:55   

   1k   

   16025   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   22 Feb 18 15:22:28   

   1,374b   

   16024   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Arindam Banerjee   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   20 Feb 18 09:19:11   

   1k   

   16023   

   Arindam Banerjee to John Heath   

   Re: Conservation of momentum   

   19 Feb 18 13:16:42   

   2k   

   16022   

   Arindam Banerjee to All   

   Re: The quaint concept of centrifugal an   

   18 Feb 18 12:41:55   

   2k   

   16021   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: The quaint concept of centrifugal an   

   18 Feb 18 08:40:25   

   2k   

   16020   

   banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com to banerjee...@gmail.com   

   Re: Newton's Principia Book III Proposit   

   18 Feb 18 00:41:56   

   2k   

   16019   

   =?UTF-8?B?TGlib3IgJ1BvdXRuaWsnIFN0x to All   

   Re: The quaint concept of centrifugal an   

   18 Feb 18 00:41:31   

   2k   

   16018   

   Jos bergervoet to Lawrence Crowell   

   Fwd: Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's    

   17 Feb 18 19:59:07   

   2k   

   16017   

   Lawrence Crowell to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: page time and quantum error correcti   

   17 Feb 18 19:58:36   

   2k   

   16016   

   Lawrence Crowell to Arindam Banerjee   

   Re: The quaint concept of centrifugal an   

   17 Feb 18 16:27:37   

   3k   

   16015   

   Lawrence Crowell to Kerry Soileau   

   Re: Electrically charged sphere in a vac   

   17 Feb 18 10:14:32   

   3,274b   

   16014   

   Arindam Banerjee to All   

   The quaint concept of centrifugal and ce   

   17 Feb 18 10:14:32   

   2k   

   16013   

   charly to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Electrically charged sphere in a vac   

   16 Feb 18 08:07:49   

   3k   

   16012   

   banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com to qri...@gmail.com   

   Re: Newton's Principia Book III Proposit   

   15 Feb 18 12:15:19   

   4k   

   16011   

   SEKI to Steven Carlip   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   15 Feb 18 12:56:31   

   2k   

   16010   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Re: page time and quantum error correcti   

   14 Feb 18 17:02:03   

   2k   

   16009   

   Lawrence Crowell to Steven Carlip   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   13 Feb 18 21:05:05   

   2k   

   16008   

   charly to Kerry Soileau   

   Re: Electrically charged sphere in a vac   

   13 Feb 18 21:05:06   

   1k   

   16007   

   Jos Bergervoet to charly   

   Re: Electrically charged sphere in a vac   

   13 Feb 18 20:57:09   

   1k   

   16006   

   John Heath to charly   

   Re: Electrically charged sphere in a vac   

   13 Feb 18 20:56:39   

   2k   

   16005   

   charly to Kerry Soileau   

   Re: Electrically charged sphere in a vac   

   13 Feb 18 16:36:30   

   1k   

   16004   

   Steven Carlip to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   12 Feb 18 06:52:35   

   1k   

   16003   

   SEKI to Mikko   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   11 Feb 18 11:42:29   

   1,167b   

   16002   

   Mikko to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   10 Feb 18 17:50:55   

   1,167b   

   16001   

   SEKI to Mikko   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   10 Feb 18 15:13:55   

   1,167b   

   16000   

   Mikko to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   09 Feb 18 12:55:54   

   1,167b   

   15999   

   SEKI to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   07 Feb 18 17:18:19   

   1k   

   15998   

   questionsphysics13@gmail.com to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Amplitude of coherent light from sta   

   07 Feb 18 13:50:02   

   2k   

   15997   

   questionsphysics13@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Amplitude of coherent light from sta   

   07 Feb 18 13:43:09   

   1,879b   

   15996   

   Lawrence Crowell to questions...@gmail.com   

   Re: Amplitude of coherent light from sta   

   07 Feb 18 13:38:11   

   2k   

   15995   

   Oliver Jennrich to questionsphysics13@gmail.com   

   Re: Amplitude of coherent light from sta   

   07 Feb 18 13:37:44   

   1k   

   15994   

   John Heath to All   

   Re: Amplitude of coherent light from sta   

   07 Feb 18 13:37:12   

   3k   

   15993   

   Jos Bergervoet to questionsphysics13@gmail.com   

   Re: Amplitude of coherent light from sta   

   06 Feb 18 23:14:32   

   2k   

   15992   

   questionsphysics13@gmail.com to All   

   Amplitude of coherent light from stars   

   05 Feb 18 18:30:37   

   1k   

   15991   

   John Heath to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   05 Feb 18 14:01:35   

   6k   

   15990   

   Jos Bergervoet to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   04 Feb 18 20:29:43   

   3k   

   15989   

   SEKI to Steven Carlip   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   04 Feb 18 19:00:36   

   1k   

   15988   

   Jos Bergervoet to Steven Carlip   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   04 Feb 18 16:17:55   

   3k   

   15987   

   Sylvia Else to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   04 Feb 18 16:17:43   

   3,572b   

   15986   

   SEKI to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   04 Feb 18 12:26:31   

   2k   

   15985   

   John Heath to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   04 Feb 18 12:25:34   

   1k   

   15984   

   Steven Carlip to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   04 Feb 18 08:11:30   

   3k   

   15983   

   SEKI to All   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   02 Feb 18 07:55:44   

   2,965b   

   15982   

   Jos Bergervoet to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   02 Feb 18 07:55:43   

   2k   

   15981   

   SEKI to John Heath   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   02 Feb 18 07:55:43   

   1,983b   

   15980   

   John Heath to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   01 Feb 18 10:53:58   

   3k   

   15979   

   SEKI to John Heath   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   30 Jan 18 21:43:19   

   1k   

   15978   

   Mikko to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   29 Jan 18 12:24:06   

   1,206b   

   15977   

   John Heath to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   29 Jan 18 10:58:55   

   3k   

   15976   

   Doug to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Avalanche proton-boron fusion   

   28 Jan 18 17:26:50   

   1k   

   15975   

   Jos Bergervoet to John Heath   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   26 Jan 18 16:52:06   

   1,530b   

   15974   

   Mikko to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   25 Jan 18 17:42:26   

   1k   

   15973   

   Michael Moroney to All   

   Forces and their mediating bosons   

   24 Jan 18 08:06:19   

   2k   

   15972   

   Robert L. Oldershaw to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   23 Jan 18 20:22:17   

   1,562b   

   15971   

   SEKI to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   23 Jan 18 20:21:47   

   1,562b   

   15970   

   Jos Bergervoet to Sylvia Else   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   23 Jan 18 15:51:38   

   3k   

   15969   

   Sylvia Else to SEKI   

   Re: A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequ   

   23 Jan 18 06:01:51   

   1k   

   15968   

   SEKI to All   

   A Hypothesis concerning Bell's Inequalit   

   22 Jan 18 21:56:13   

   1k   

   15967   

   Tom Roberts to augustin.coppey@gmail.com   

   Re: Question regarding uncertainty princ   

   21 Jan 18 22:58:36   

   3k   

   15966   

   =?UTF-8?B?TGlib3IgJ1BvdXRuaWsnIFN0x to All   

   Re: Question regarding uncertainty princ   

   21 Jan 18 15:50:37   

   2k   

   15965   

   qripet@gmail.com to All   

   Newton's Principia Book III Propositions   

   19 Jan 18 11:23:18   

   2k   

   15964   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   17 Jan 18 15:48:02   

   2k   

   15963   

   Lawrence Crowell to reply   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   16 Jan 18 22:11:58   

   1k   

   15962   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to Gary Harnagel   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   14 Jan 18 16:42:07   

   3k   

   15961   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   14 Jan 18 16:38:16   

   1k   

   15960   

   Gary Harnagel to All   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   14 Jan 18 16:19:36   

   1k   

   15959   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   14 Jan 18 14:15:48   

   3k   

   15958   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Harnagel   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   14 Jan 18 12:58:13   

   2k   

   15957   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   14 Jan 18 08:54:49   

   2k   

   15956   

   Lawrence Crowell to reply   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   13 Jan 18 19:42:16   

   2k   

   15955   

   Gary Harnagel to All   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   13 Jan 18 14:06:26   

   1k   

   15954   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Heath   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   13 Jan 18 07:56:35   

   1k   

   15953   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Robert L. Oldershaw   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   13 Jan 18 07:56:35   

   2k   

   15952   

   John Heath to Robert L. Oldershaw   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   12 Jan 18 17:54:55   

   2k   

   15951   

   Robert L. Oldershaw to John Heath   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   12 Jan 18 08:07:49   

   1k   

   15950   

   John Heath to All   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   11 Jan 18 20:43:01   

   1,319b   

   15949   

   Jos Bergervoet to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: page time and quantum error correcti   

   06 Jan 18 12:58:50   

   2k   

   15948   

   Lawrence Crowell to All   

   page time and quantum error correction   

   05 Jan 18 22:25:31   

   2k   

   15947   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The "apparent" acceleration   

   23 Dec 17 15:35:18   

   1,868b   

   15946   

   Robert L. Oldershaw to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Trouble For Dark Energy Hypothesis?   

   23 Dec 17 15:12:58   

   1k   

   15945   

   =?UTF-8?B?TGlib3IgJ1BvdXRuaWsnIFN0x to All   

   Re: The "apparent" acceleration   

   21 Dec 17 14:25:37   

   1k   

   15944   

   edprochak@gmail.com to Internetado   

   Re: In a first, Galileo's gravity experi   

   20 Dec 17 08:29:37   

   1,285b   

   15943   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "apparent" acceleration   

   20 Dec 17 08:29:36   

   2k   

   15942   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The "apparent" acceleration   

   19 Dec 17 20:11:07   

   1,876b   

   15941   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "apparent" acceleration   

   18 Dec 17 21:11:45   

   1k   

   15940   

   John Heath to Doug Goncz   

   Re: Resonant and Anitresonant Structural   

   17 Dec 17 14:24:22   

   2k   

   15939   

   Doug Goncz to All   

   Resonant and Anitresonant Structural and   

   17 Dec 17 13:33:18   

   3k   

   15938   

   John Heath to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "apparent" acceleration   

   17 Dec 17 13:33:18   

   2k   

   15937   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The "apparent" acceleration   

   15 Dec 17 22:19:28   

   1,717b   

   15936   

   Lawrence Crowell to Michael Cole   

   Re: Question about spin 1 particles   

   22 Nov 17 08:23:21   

   1,717b   

   15935   

   Michael Cole to All   

   Question about spin 1 particles   

   20 Nov 17 13:36:31   

   1,717b   

   15934   

   John Heath to Tom Roberts   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   20 Nov 17 13:36:06   

   3k   

   15933   

   Tom Roberts to richard isakson   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   20 Nov 17 20:49:50   

   1k   

   15932   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   20 Nov 17 20:49:19   

   2k   

   15931   

   =?UTF-8?B?TGlib3IgJ1BvdXRuaWsnIFN0x to All   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   20 Nov 17 20:48:49   

   1,543b   

   15930   

   Tom Roberts to John Heath   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   19 Nov 17 10:01:36   

   2k   

   15929   

   richard isakson to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   18 Nov 17 01:40:42   

   2k   

   15928   

   =?UTF-8?B?TGlib3IgJ1BvdXRuaWsnIFN0x to All   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   18 Nov 17 01:40:20   

   2k   

   15927   

   =?UTF-8?B?TGlib3IgJ1BvdXRuaWsnIFN0x to All   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   16 Nov 17 09:20:54   

   2k   

   15926   

   Stefan Ram to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   16 Nov 17 09:20:53   

   1k   

   15925   

   John Heath to millssc...@gmail.com   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   16 Nov 17 09:20:53   

   2k   

   15924   

   millsscientific@gmail.com to All   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   15 Nov 17 21:50:41   

   1k   

   15923   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   15 Nov 17 21:50:11   

   1,095b   

   15922   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   15 Nov 17 08:16:36   

   6k   

   15921   

   Douglas Eagleson to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   14 Nov 17 15:08:12   

   2k   

   15920   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   14 Nov 17 08:38:40   

   1,834b   

   15919   

   =?UTF-8?B?TGlib3IgJ1BvdXRuaWsnIFN0x to All   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   13 Nov 17 23:14:39   

   2k   

   15918   

   =?UTF-8?B?TGlib3IgJ1BvdXRuaWsnIFN0x to All   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   13 Nov 17 22:46:52   

   1k   

   15917   

   J.B. Wood to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   13 Nov 17 22:46:31   

   1k   

   15916   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   13 Nov 17 22:46:16   

   2k   

   15915   

   =?UTF-8?B?TGlib3IgJ1BvdXRuaWsnIFN0x to All   

   Re: The "apparent" forces   

   13 Nov 17 22:29:07   

   1k   

   15914   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The "apparent" forces   

   12 Nov 17 21:58:10   

   1,211b   

   15913   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Strength and acceleration   

   11 Nov 17 13:53:09   

   3k   

   15912   

   Ned Latham to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Strength and acceleration   

   10 Nov 17 16:15:58   

   1k   

   15911   

   Pierre Stowe to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Strength and acceleration   

   10 Nov 17 16:15:58   

   1k   

   15910   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Strength and acceleration   

   09 Nov 17 13:06:17   

   1,140b   

   15909   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: Strength and acceleration   

   05 Nov 17 15:47:31   

   1,140b   

   15908   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: The books GRAVITATION and Spacetime    

   27 Oct 17 07:13:00   

   3k   

   15907   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   25 Oct 17 07:33:28   

   1k   

   15906   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   Re: neutrinos vs compact objects   

   22 Oct 17 07:55:42   

   2k   

   15905   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to toadastronomer@gmail.com   

   Re: neutrinos vs compact objects   

   21 Oct 17 15:57:59   

   1,832b   

   15904   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to Tom Roberts   

   Re: neutrinos vs compact objects   

   21 Oct 17 06:29:38   

   3k   

   15903   

   Tom Roberts to toadastronomer@gmail.com   

   Re: neutrinos vs compact objects   

   17 Oct 17 09:25:33   

   2k   

   15902   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   neutrinos vs compact objects   

   16 Oct 17 12:45:22   

   2,158b   

   15901   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   Google Scholar Citations: need contact a   

   15 Oct 17 15:08:56   

   2,158b   

   15900   

   Tom Roberts to John Heath   

   Re: protons , anti protons and lithium   

   14 Oct 17 13:37:56   

   1k   

   15899   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   14 Oct 17 19:13:22   

   3k   

   15898   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to Gerry Quinn   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   13 Oct 17 06:14:42   

   2k   

   15897   

   John Heath to Tom Roberts   

   Re: protons , anti protons and lithium   

   12 Oct 17 17:55:55   

   2k   

   15896   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Meditations about the force   

   12 Oct 17 16:24:55   

   1k   

   15895   

   Tom Roberts to John Heath   

   Re: protons , anti protons and lithium   

   12 Oct 17 21:36:43   

   1k   

   15894   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Measure distances with perspective   

   12 Oct 17 13:23:57   

   1,508b   

   15893   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Measure distances with perspective   

   12 Oct 17 13:23:28   

   1,508b   

   15892   

   Nicolaas Vroom to lbjohn...@yahoo.com   

   Re: Twins and space station [repost]   

   11 Oct 17 16:36:21   

   2k   

   15891   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   neutrinos and gravitational waves   

   11 Oct 17 19:57:03   

   1,707b   

   15890   

   bibekphysics88@gmail.com to All   

   Nuclear physics   

   09 Oct 17 00:29:04   

   1,707b   

   15889   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   Re: cern neutrino beam from 100,000 ligh   

   09 Oct 17 00:03:50   

   1k   

   15888   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   09 Oct 17 00:02:25   

   3k   

   15887   

   Jens Schweikhardt to All   

   Re: cern neutrino beam from 100,000 ligh   

   08 Oct 17 23:55:10   

   2k   

   15886   

   Lawrence Crowell to toadast...@gmail.com   

   Re: cern neutrino beam from 100,000 ligh   

   08 Oct 17 23:53:37   

   1,581b   

   15885   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Measure distances with perspective   

   08 Oct 17 23:53:19   

   1,581b   

   15884   

   Torn Rumero DeBrak to All   

   Re: Measure distances with perspective   

   08 Oct 17 23:53:03   

   1,581b   

   15883   

   lbjohnson1949@yahoo.com to All   

   Re: Twins and space station [repost]   

   08 Oct 17 23:52:25   

   1k   

   15882   

   Tom Roberts to Gerry Quinn   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   07 Oct 17 07:59:17   

   1,049b   

   15881   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Measure distances with perspective   

   06 Oct 17 17:26:51   

   1,049b   

   15880   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   cern neutrino beam from 100,000 light ye   

   06 Oct 17 07:15:48   

   1,049b   

   15879   

   Ned Latham to Sylvia Else   

   Re: Problem   

   06 Oct 17 07:15:48   

   1k   

   15878   

   Douglas Eagleson to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   05 Oct 17 16:40:10   

   4k   

   15877   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Problem   

   05 Oct 17 00:26:54   

   3,647b   

   15876   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Twins and space station [repost]   

   05 Oct 17 00:12:54   

   3k   

   15875   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Problem   

   03 Oct 17 20:52:56   

   2,725b   

   15874   

   J.B. Wood to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   03 Oct 17 20:52:26   

   1k   

   15873   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   03 Oct 17 15:30:38   

   3k   

   15872   

   John Heath to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: the limits c   

   02 Oct 17 18:36:44   

   2k   

   15871   

   Lawrence Crowell to John Heath   

   Re: the limits c   

   02 Oct 17 01:26:19   

   1,567b   

   15870   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   01 Oct 17 17:20:29   

   4k   

   15869   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Problem   

   01 Oct 17 17:19:58   

   3,598b   

   15868   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   30 Sep 17 19:34:07   

   2k   

   15867   

   Tom Roberts to J.B. Wood   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   30 Sep 17 19:33:37   

   1k   

   15866   

   Jos Bergervoet to John Heath   

   Re: the limits c   

   30 Sep 17 11:10:27   

   1,493b   

   15865   

   Tom Roberts to John Heath   

   Re: the limits c   

   30 Sep 17 11:10:00   

   2k   

   15864   

   John Heath to All   

   the limits c   

   29 Sep 17 13:20:58   

   2,074b   

   15863   

   J.B. Wood to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   27 Sep 17 10:02:45   

   2,074b   

   15862   

   Torn Rumero DeBrak to All   

   Re: Is my calculation correct?   

   29 Sep 17 06:52:04   

   2,074b   

   15861   

   Douglas Eagleson to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is my calculation correct?   

   29 Sep 17 06:52:03   

   1k   

   15860   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   29 Sep 17 06:52:03   

   2k   

   15859   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Is my calculation correct?   

   28 Sep 17 22:21:21   

   2,219b   

   15858   

   J.B. Wood to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   28 Sep 17 22:15:54   

   1k   

   15857   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Is my calculation correct?   

   28 Sep 17 22:15:37   

   1k   

   15856   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Is my calculation correct?   

   26 Sep 17 23:01:01   

   1,401b   

   15855   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein -- both at the s   

   25 Sep 17 22:00:42   

   1k   

   15854   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   25 Sep 17 21:59:56   

   1,084b   

   15853   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   25 Sep 17 05:35:03   

   1k   

   15852   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   24 Sep 17 16:59:48   

   1,444b   

   15851   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   24 Sep 17 13:56:49   

   1k   

   15850   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Gerry Quinn   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   24 Sep 17 13:56:31   

   2k   

   15849   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   24 Sep 17 08:49:24   

   3k   

   15848   

   Nicolaas Vroom to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   23 Sep 17 12:56:27   

   3k   

   15847   

   Poutnik to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   23 Sep 17 12:55:57   

   1k   

   15846   

   Poutnik to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   23 Sep 17 12:55:27   

   1,282b   

   15845   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Twins and space station (1/2)   

   23 Sep 17 12:54:57   

   7k   

   15844   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   23 Sep 17 12:54:27   

   3k   

   15843   

   Lawrence Crowell to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   22 Sep 17 22:13:04   

   3k   

   15842   

   Gary Harnagel to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   22 Sep 17 22:10:47   

   5k   

   15841   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   22 Sep 17 22:10:30   

   1k   

   15840   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   22 Sep 17 22:09:52   

   1k   

   15839   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein -- both at the s   

   22 Sep 17 06:43:20   

   2k   

   15838   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   22 Sep 17 06:42:49   

   1,971b   

   15837   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   22 Sep 17 06:42:19   

   4k   

   15836   

   Poutnik to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   22 Sep 17 06:41:19   

   4,486b   

   15835   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   21 Sep 17 13:53:32   

   1k   

   15834   

   Poutnik to All   

   Re: Newton vs. Einstein   

   21 Sep 17 06:58:38   

   1,460b   

   15833   

   Tom Roberts to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The same angle measured by two space   

   21 Sep 17 06:58:38   

   1k   

   15832   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Newton vs. Einstein   

   20 Sep 17 23:30:34   

   1,162b   

   15831   

   Douglas Eagleson to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The same angle measured by two space   

   20 Sep 17 23:26:19   

   1k   

   15830   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The same angle measured by two spaceship   

   20 Sep 17 10:53:58   

   1,238b   

   15829   

   Steven Carlip to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: Hydrogen paradox (1/2)   

   14 Sep 17 10:44:45   

   7k   

   15828   

   John Heath to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: How many bowling pins fall down?   

   14 Sep 17 07:49:42   

   2k   

   15827   

   Gregor Scholten to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Hydrogen paradox (2/2)   

   14 Sep 17 07:32:31   

   1,616b   

   15826   

   Gregor Scholten to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Hydrogen paradox (1/2)   

   14 Sep 17 07:32:31   

   7k   

   15825   

   Gregor Scholten to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: How many bowling pins fall down?   

   13 Sep 17 17:01:13   

   4k   

   15824   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   How many bowling pins fall down?   

   12 Sep 17 22:43:55   

   1k   

   15823   

   Lawrence Crowell to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Hydrogen paradox   

   12 Sep 17 22:42:53   

   2k   

   15822   

   Jos Bergervoet to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: Hydrogen paradox   

   09 Sep 17 07:10:43   

   4k   

   15821   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   08 Sep 17 12:36:18   

   1k   

   15820   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   06 Sep 17 15:32:30   

   4k   

   15819   

   Gary Harnagel to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Twins and space station (1/2)   

   06 Sep 17 10:57:59   

   7k   

   15818   

   millsscientific@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Looking for opinions on passage on m   

   05 Sep 17 23:06:22   

   2k   

   15817   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Gary Harnagel   

   Re: Twins and space station (2/2)   

   05 Sep 17 22:55:33   

   1,929b   

   15816   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The clock at the mirror   

   03 Sep 17 10:05:11   

   2k   

   15815   

   Gary Harnagel to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   03 Sep 17 14:31:14   

   2k   

   15814   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The clock at the mirror   

   03 Sep 17 14:31:14   

   2,116b   

   15813   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Quarkless QCD glueball decay   

   02 Sep 17 18:16:47   

   3k   

   15812   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: The clock at the mirror   

   02 Sep 17 10:15:52   

   3k   

   15811   

   Gregor Scholten to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Hydrogen paradox   

   02 Sep 17 10:15:25   

   2k   

   15810   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   02 Sep 17 14:33:48   

   4k   

   15809   

   Gregor Scholten to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The clock at the mirror   

   02 Sep 17 10:54:33   

   2k   

   15808   

   Lawrence Crowell to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Gravitational lensing of gravitons b   

   31 Aug 17 07:31:22   

   2k   

   15807   

   Lawrence Crowell to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Quarkless QCD glueball decay   

   31 Aug 17 07:31:22   

   2k   

   15806   

   richalivingston@gmail.com to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The clock at the mirror   

   30 Aug 17 23:48:09   

   2k   

   15805   

   Sylvia Else to Luigi Fortunati   

   Re: The clock at the mirror   

   29 Aug 17 12:26:38   

   1,923b   

   15804   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   The clock at the mirror   

   29 Aug 17 07:21:35   

   1k   

   15803   

   Tom Roberts to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Gravitational lensing of gravitons b   

   29 Aug 17 07:21:34   

   1k   

   15802   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   29 Aug 17 07:21:35   

   2k   

   15801   

   omnilobe@gmail.com to Ralph Frost   

   Re: Spectral line changes?   

   29 Aug 17 07:21:35   

   2,365b   

   15800   

   Ralph Frost to All   

   Spectral line changes?   

   28 Aug 17 11:30:10   

   2,365b   

   15799   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Quarkless QCD glueball decay   

   25 Aug 17 09:35:45   

   2k   

   15798   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Quarkless QCD glueball decay   

   24 Aug 17 23:39:37   

   1k   

   15797   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Meditations about the force   

   23 Aug 17 22:28:56   

   3k   

   15796   

   Douglas Eagleson to All   

   Radon Testing Using Alpha Track Sensors    

   23 Aug 17 19:24:59   

   2k   

   15795   

   John Heath to omni...@gmail.com   

   Re: Announcing Periodic Table of the Sha   

   23 Aug 17 19:24:48   

   2,507b   

   15794   

   Richard D. Saam to Tom Roberts   

   Re: A return to "faster than wind"   

   21 Aug 17 23:47:48   

   2k   

   15793   

   J. J. Lodder to All   

   Re: A return to "faster than wind"   

   21 Aug 17 23:47:21   

   1k   

   15792   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: Gravitational lensing of gravitons b   

   21 Aug 17 23:44:57   

   2k   

   15791   

   Lawrence Crowell to stargene   

   Re: Gravitational lensing of gravitons b   

   21 Aug 17 23:44:31   

   1k   

   15790   

   Lawrence Crowell to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Quarkless QCD glueball decay   

   21 Aug 17 23:44:03   

   4k   

   15789   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Re: Meditations about the force   

   19 Aug 17 23:37:00   

   4k   

   15788   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Hydrogen paradox   

   19 Aug 17 00:44:39   

   1k   

   15787   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: Quarkless QCD glueball decay   

   19 Aug 17 00:42:12   

   1k   

   15786   

   stargene to All   

   Gravitational lensing of gravitons by a    

   19 Aug 17 06:56:12   

   1k   

   15785   

   Richard D. Saam to Sylvia Else   

   Re: A return to "faster than wind"   

   18 Aug 17 06:42:26   

   2k   

   15784   

   Tom Roberts to Richard D. Saam   

   Re: A return to "faster than wind"   

   18 Aug 17 06:42:25   

   1,820b   

   15783   

   John Heath to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   16 Aug 17 22:45:50   

   4k   

   15782   

   Luigi Fortunati to All   

   Meditations about the force   

   15 Aug 17 11:14:21   

   2k   

   15781   

   Tom Roberts to John Heath   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   15 Aug 17 11:08:42   

   1k   

   15780   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Quarkless QCD glueball decay   

   14 Aug 17 10:57:10   

   1,156b   

   15779   

   Sylvia Else to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: Lift in free fall   

   11 Aug 17 07:22:06   

   1,156b   

   15778   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Lift in free fall   

   10 Aug 17 12:01:30   

   1k   

   15777   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Switch from one reference to another   

   10 Aug 17 11:13:53   

   1,532b   

   15776   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Switch from one reference to another   

   10 Aug 17 00:33:50   

   1k   

   15775   

   Jos Bergervoet to fortunati.luigi@gmail.com   

   Re: Switch from one reference to another   

   10 Aug 17 00:33:08   

   4k   

   15774   

   John Heath to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   08 Aug 17 22:55:48   

   2k   

   15773   

   fortunati.luigi@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Switch from one reference to another   

   08 Aug 17 17:54:03   

   3k   

   15772   

   Tom Roberts to John Heath   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   08 Aug 17 13:37:23   

   1k   

   15771   

   Jos Bergervoet to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: Switch from one reference to another   

   08 Aug 17 11:43:18   

   2k   

   15770   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Switch from one reference to another   

   08 Aug 17 00:36:17   

   1,886b   

   15769   

   John Heath to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   08 Aug 17 00:35:43   

   2k   

   15768   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   08 Aug 17 00:35:03   

   4k   

   15767   

   Gary Harnagel to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   08 Aug 17 00:32:42   

   2k   

   15766   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   07 Aug 17 07:52:32   

   1,798b   

   15765   

   John Heath to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: A calculation (perhaps) impossible   

   07 Aug 17 07:52:32   

   4k   

   15764   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   06 Aug 17 10:26:33   

   1k   

   15763   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   06 Aug 17 10:20:53   

   1,532b   

   15762   

   Tom Roberts to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   06 Aug 17 10:20:38   

   2k   

   15761   

   Sylvia Else to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   06 Aug 17 12:37:54   

   1k   

   15760   

   Gary Harnagel to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   06 Aug 17 12:19:01   

   1,075b   

   15759   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   06 Aug 17 10:13:15   

   1k   

   15758   

   Sylvia Else to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   05 Aug 17 16:03:28   

   2k   

   15757   

   John Heath to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   05 Aug 17 16:03:27   

   2k   

   15756   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   05 Aug 17 08:53:43   

   2k   

   15755   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Twins and space station   

   05 Aug 17 06:36:25   

   2k   

   15754   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: A calculation (perhaps) impossible   

   04 Aug 17 06:47:53   

   3k   

   15753   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: A calculation (perhaps) impossible   

   03 Aug 17 06:54:12   

   2k   

   15752   

   millsscientific@gmail.com to ju...@diegidio.name   

   Re: Looking for opinions on passage on m   

   02 Aug 17 13:29:18   

   4k   

   15751   

   J. J. Lodder to Thomas Koenig   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   01 Aug 17 15:14:24   

   2k   

   15750   

   J. J. Lodder to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   01 Aug 17 12:22:50   

   2k   

   15749   

   J. J. Lodder to Thomas Koenig   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   01 Aug 17 12:22:50   

   2k   

   15748   

   julio@diegidio.name to Douglas Eagleson   

   Re: Looking for opinions on passage on m   

   01 Aug 17 08:53:50   

   2k   

   15747   

   Thomas Koenig to jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   01 Aug 17 07:23:34   

   2,271b   

   15746   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   01 Aug 17 07:21:44   

   7k   

   15745   

   Douglas Eagleson to ju...@diegidio.name   

   Re: Looking for opinions on passage on m   

   01 Aug 17 07:21:43   

   2k   

   15744   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: A calculation (perhaps) impossible   

   01 Aug 17 07:21:43   

   1k   

   15743   

   Tom Roberts to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   31 Jul 17 15:16:48   

   1k   

   15742   

   Jos Bergervoet to Thomas Koenig   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   31 Jul 17 13:10:55   

   2k   

   15741   

   julio@diegidio.name to greysky   

   Re: Looking for opinions on passage on m   

   31 Jul 17 11:51:46   

   1,800b   

   15740   

   greysky to All   

   Looking for opinions on passage on motio   

   31 Jul 17 11:35:21   

   2k   

   15739   

   Thomas Koenig to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   31 Jul 17 11:35:21   

   1k   

   15738   

   Douglas Eagleson to Sylvia Else   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   30 Jul 17 12:10:36   

   3k   

   15737   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: A calculation (perhaps) impossible   

   30 Jul 17 12:09:50   

   3k   

   15736   

   Jos Bergervoet to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: A calculation (perhaps) impossible   

   30 Jul 17 07:00:51   

   2k   

   15735   

   Sylvia Else to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: A calculation (perhaps) impossible   

   30 Jul 17 12:44:55   

   1k   

   15734   

   Jos Bergervoet to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: A calculation (perhaps) impossible   

   30 Jul 17 07:00:12   

   2k   

   15733   

   Sylvia Else to Ernard Hevalier   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   30 Jul 17 07:00:11   

   2,192b   

   15732   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   A calculation (perhaps) impossible   

   29 Jul 17 11:10:30   

   2,192b   

   15731   

   Ernard Hevalier to Sylvia Else   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   29 Jul 17 11:10:29   

   2,192b   

   15730   

   Sylvia Else to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   25 Jul 17 07:11:39   

   2k   

   15729   

   Ralph Frost to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   25 Jul 17 07:06:56   

   4k   

   15728   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   25 Jul 17 07:06:56   

   1k   

   15727   

   Lawrence Crowell to artrott...@gmail.com   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_normal_matter=2C_dark_ma   

   25 Jul 17 07:06:56   

   3k   

   15726   

   Sylvia Else to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   24 Jul 17 08:27:39   

   1k   

   15725   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   How to see a bound state in classical fi   

   24 Jul 17 08:26:13   

   2k   

   15724   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   24 Jul 17 07:35:57   

   1,635b   

   15723   

   Thomas Cuny to artrott...@gmail.com   

   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_normal_matter=2C_dark_ma   

   23 Jul 17 21:41:41   

   1,635b   

   15722   

   J. J. Lodder to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   23 Jul 17 21:41:32   

   2k   

   15721   

   Jos Bergervoet to Sylvia Else   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   23 Jul 17 21:41:22   

   5k   

   15720   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   23 Jul 17 21:41:06   

   2k   

   15719   

   Douglas Eagleson to michael....@gmail.com   

   Re: Born-Oppenheimer force   

   23 Jul 17 16:04:42   

   1k   

   15718   

   michael.r.sabino@gmail.com to All   

   Born-Oppenheimer force   

   23 Jul 17 07:01:50   

   1,342b   

   15717   

   J. J. Lodder to rockbrentwood@gmail.com   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   23 Jul 17 07:01:49   

   3k   

   15716   

   Sylvia Else to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   22 Jul 17 22:19:57   

   1k   

   15715   

   J. J. Lodder to rockbrentwood@gmail.com   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   22 Jul 17 17:30:51   

   4k   

   15714   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   22 Jul 17 15:20:15   

   2k   

   15713   

   Tom Roberts to rockbrentwood@gmail.com   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   22 Jul 17 16:00:20   

   1,545b   

   15712   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to rockbr...@gmail.com   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   21 Jul 17 20:29:09   

   3k   

   15711   

   Sylvia Else to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: The universe of the traveling twin   

   21 Jul 17 20:27:54   

   2k   

   15710   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Mental Experiment   

   21 Jul 17 05:43:33   

   1,927b   

   15709   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   The universe of the traveling twin   

   21 Jul 17 05:43:33   

   1,927b   

   15708   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Mental Experiment   

   19 Jul 17 09:07:30   

   2k   

   15707   

   Sylvia Else to LuigiFortunati   

   Re: Mental Experiment   

   19 Jul 17 01:13:32   

   1k   

   15706   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to J. J. Lodder   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   19 Jul 17 01:13:08   

   4k   

   15705   

   Ralph Frost to Edgar L. Owen   

   Re: Are north and south magnetic fields    

   18 Jul 17 12:08:05   

   3k   

   15704   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Re: Mental Experiment   

   18 Jul 17 12:01:33   

   1k   

   15703   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: Mental Experiment   

   18 Jul 17 12:01:06   

   1,099b   

   15702   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: Are north and south magnetic fields    

   18 Jul 17 15:14:37   

   5k   

   15701   

   LuigiFortunati to All   

   Mental Experiment   

   15 Jul 17 16:54:19   

   4,996b   

   15700   

   J. J. Lodder to Thomas Koenig   

   Re: Mathematics of physical units and di   

   15 Jul 17 16:53:57   

   2k   

   15699   

   Edgar L. Owen to Ralph Frost   

   Re: Are north and south magnetic fields    

   14 Jul 17 12:11:12   

   2k   

   15698   

   John Heath to John Heath   

   Re: Are north and south magnetic fields    

   12 Jul 17 07:25:33   

   4k   

   15697   

   J.B. Wood to Ralph Frost   

   Re: Are north and south magnetic fields    

   11 Jul 17 11:24:00   

   2k   

   15696   

   Lawrence Crowell to Ralph Frost   

   Re: Are north and south magnetic fields    

   11 Jul 17 11:23:59   

   2k   

   15695   

   Ralph Frost to John Heath   

   Re: Are north and south magnetic fields    

   10 Jul 17 22:57:31   

   1k   

   15694   

   John Heath to Ralph Frost   

   Re: Are north and south magnetic fields    

   10 Jul 17 12:02:56   

   3k   

   15693   

   Thomas Koenig to All   

   Mathematics of physical units and dimens   

   10 Jul 17 11:58:45   

   1k   

   15692   

   Ralph Frost to All   

   Are north and south magnetic fields meas   

   09 Jul 17 05:14:11   

   2k   

   15691   

   Lawrence Crowell to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   07 Jul 17 07:29:19   

   6k   

   15690   

   Jos Bergervoet to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   06 Jul 17 07:12:17   

   6k   

   15689   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Re: Continuous rotation of a circular co   

   05 Jul 17 17:21:42   

   6,173b   

   15688   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to John Heath   

   Re: Newtonian physics and the speed of l   

   04 Jul 17 06:21:26   

   4k   

   15687   

   darmstrong@saddleback.edu to All   

   Mechanical Universe VHS series (v.1-52)   

   01 Jul 17 15:53:14   

   4,048b   

   15686   

   Lawrence Crowell to James Goetz   

   Re: Assuming general relativity, quantum   

   01 Jul 17 09:36:54   

   4,048b   

   15685   

   James Goetz to All   

   Re: Assuming general relativity, quantum   

   29 Jun 17 00:05:36   

   4,048b   

   15684   

   Lawrence Crowell to James Goetz   

   Re: Assuming general relativity, quantum   

   28 Jun 17 09:44:07   

   1k   

   15683   

   Sylvia Else to James Goetz   

   Re: Assuming general relativity, quantum   

   28 Jun 17 11:17:58   

   1,197b   

   15682   

   James Goetz to James Goetz   

   Re: Assuming general relativity, quantum   

   28 Jun 17 00:35:13   

   1,197b   

   15681   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Continuous rotation of a circular coil e   

   26 Jun 17 22:29:34   

   1,197b   

   15680   

   James Goetz to All   

   Assuming general relativity, quantum gra   

   26 Jun 17 22:25:00   

   1,197b   

   15679   

   Lawrence Crowell to Tom Roberts   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   26 Jun 17 22:24:22   

   2k   

   15678   

   Hendrik van Hees to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   26 Jun 17 22:24:02   

   1,571b   

   15677   

   Lawrence Crowell to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   26 Jun 17 22:23:39   

   6k   

   15676   

   Tom Roberts to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   26 Jun 17 14:18:12   

   1k   

   15675   

   Lawrence Crowell to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   25 Jun 17 07:26:51   

   1,333b   

   15674   

   Gregor Scholten to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   24 Jun 17 20:15:03   

   1,333b   

   15673   

   Jos Bergervoet to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   21 Jun 17 21:54:44   

   3k   

   15672   

   Lawrence Crowell to Gerry Quinn   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   20 Jun 17 06:20:46   

   4k   

   15671   

   Lawrence Crowell to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   19 Jun 17 20:54:00   

   3k   

   15670   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   19 Jun 17 08:18:59   

   3k   

   15669   

   Gregor Scholten to James Goetz   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   18 Jun 17 21:13:44   

   2k   

   15668   

   Lawrence Crowell to James Goetz   

   Re: What is the ratio of gluons to baryo   

   18 Jun 17 16:40:29   

   1k   

   15667   

   James Goetz to All   

   What is the ratio of gluons to baryons?   

   18 Jun 17 13:17:09   

   1,215b   

   15666   

   Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to All   

   want to donate American Journal of Physi   

   16 Jun 17 00:17:41   

   1,215b   

   15665   

   Lawrence Crowell to Gerry Quinn   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   16 Jun 17 00:13:16   

   3k   

   15664   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   15 Jun 17 10:14:46   

   2k   

   15663   

   John Heath to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: Noodle heads and bean counters   

   15 Jun 17 10:14:32   

   2k   

   15662   

   John Heath to Jay R. Yablon   

   Re: Noodle heads and bean counters   

   15 Jun 17 10:09:52   

   4k   

   15661   

   artrotterdamart@gmail.com to All   

   normal matter, dark matter and doesn’t   

   15 Jun 17 13:14:41   

   2k   

   15660   

   Lawrence Crowell to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   12 Jun 17 07:28:04   

   2k   

   15659   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to '''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   11 Jun 17 20:47:19   

   2k   

   15658   

   Gregor Scholten to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   11 Jun 17 06:51:12   

   2k   

   15657   

   Richard D. Saam to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   10 Jun 17 17:25:25   

   1k   

   15656   

   Martin Brown to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   10 Jun 17 06:54:03   

   1k   

   15655   

   Jay R. Yablon to John Heath   

   Re: Noodle heads and bean counters   

   09 Jun 17 13:45:17   

   2k   

   15654   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   08 Jun 17 20:26:05   

   1,640b   

   15653   

   Martin Brown to jacobnavia   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   08 Jun 17 15:07:11   

   3k   

   15652   

   Richard D. Saam to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   08 Jun 17 15:07:11   

   2,567b   

   15651   

   John Heath to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Noodle heads and bean counters   

   07 Jun 17 10:27:37   

   2,567b   

   15650   

   Gregor Scholten to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   07 Jun 17 07:08:18   

   3k   

   15649   

   Tom Roberts to John Heath   

   Re: Noodle heads and bean counters   

   05 Jun 17 11:15:49   

   2,896b   

   15648   

   Steven Carlip to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   04 Jun 17 07:47:56   

   3k   

   15647   

   John Heath to All   

   Noodle heads and bean counters   

   04 Jun 17 07:47:26   

   3k   

   15646   

   Poutnik to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   03 Jun 17 07:07:28   

   1k   

   15645   

   jacobnavia to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   02 Jun 17 21:43:29   

   1,445b   

   15644   

   Martin Brown to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   02 Jun 17 12:47:56   

   3k   

   15643   

   Tom Roberts to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   02 Jun 17 12:47:55   

   2k   

   15642   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   02 Jun 17 11:30:50   

   3k   

   15641   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Gerry Quinn   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   02 Jun 17 11:07:20   

   1k   

   15640   

   Poutnik to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   02 Jun 17 07:16:22   

   1,374b   

   15639   

   jacobnavia to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   02 Jun 17 07:04:11   

   1k   

   15638   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   02 Jun 17 06:20:16   

   2k   

   15637   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Gerry Quinn   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   01 Jun 17 21:36:57   

   1k   

   15636   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   01 Jun 17 21:24:15   

   2k   

   15635   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   30 May 17 18:55:17   

   2,063b   

   15634   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   30 May 17 12:47:58   

   1k   

   15633   

   Eric Flesch to All   

   Re: entropy and gravitation   

   30 May 17 11:30:09   

   1,444b   

   15632   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to All   

   entropy and gravitation   

   30 May 17 05:55:16   

   1k   

   15631   

   Gregor Scholten to John Heath   

   Re: Newtonian physics and the speed of l   

   29 May 17 00:55:45   

   2k   

   15630   

   Lawrence Crowell to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   29 May 17 00:55:26   

   5k   

   15629   

   Gregor Scholten to Lawrence Crowell   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   27 May 17 09:52:09   

   2k   

   15628   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: Newtonian physics and the speed of l   

   27 May 17 09:51:38   

   2k   

   15627   

   Gary Harnagel to John Heath   

   Re: Newtonian physics and the speed of l   

   26 May 17 11:52:57   

   2k   

   15626   

   John Heath to All   

   Newtonian physics and the speed of light   

   26 May 17 07:23:50   

   1k   

   15625   

   Lawrence Crowell to matmzc%ho...@gtempaccount.com   

   Re: Photon spin   

   25 May 17 14:50:19   

   1k   

   15624   

   thisislbk@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Photon spin   

   25 May 17 12:12:10   

   1,323b   

   15623   

   Lawrence Crowell to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   24 May 17 21:37:33   

   5k   

   15622   

   Gregor Scholten to Ned Latham   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   21 May 17 12:46:56   

   4k   

   15621   

   Lawrence Crowell to Ned Latham   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   16 May 17 06:21:10   

   2k   

   15620   

   Ned Latham to Gregor Scholten   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   15 May 17 11:43:53   

   2k   

   15619   

   Gregor Scholten to Ned Latham   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   15 May 17 01:11:59   

   2k   

   15618   

   PengKuan Em to All   

   Length-contraction-magnetic-force betwee   

   04 May 17 07:22:00   

   2,283b   

   15617   

   Gregor Scholten to stargene   

   Re: Does all Hawking radiation require a   

   25 Apr 17 22:35:55   

   3k   

   15616   

   Gregor Scholten to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Is the "uncertainty principle" a law   

   17 Apr 17 17:04:38   

   2,830b   

   15615   

   novasp9@gmail.com to SEKI   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   15 Apr 17 23:59:38   

   2,830b   

   15614   

   Lawrence Crowell to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Does gravity travel at the speed of    

   13 Apr 17 12:56:15   

   1k   

   15613   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Does gravity travel at the speed of    

   12 Apr 17 20:55:36   

   3k   

   15612   

   Lawrence Crowell to James Goetz   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   07 Apr 17 13:01:14   

   3k   

   15611   

   James Goetz to Douglas Eagleson   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   05 Apr 17 07:26:20   

   2k   

   15610   

   James Goetz to All   

   Requesting feedback for my summary of qu   

   02 Apr 17 15:18:01   

   3k   

   15609   

   James Goetz to All   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   02 Apr 17 15:26:58   

   2,894b   

   15608   

   Douglas Eagleson to James Goetz   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   02 Apr 17 13:20:24   

   1k   

   15607   

   James Goetz to Ned Latham   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   02 Apr 17 06:58:50   

   5k   

   15606   

   James Goetz to Ned Latham   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   01 Apr 17 06:52:57   

   3k   

   15605   

   Tom Roberts to Stefan Ram   

   Re: Does gravity travel at the speed of    

   31 Mar 17 14:33:05   

   2k   

   15604   

   Ned Latham to James Goetz   

   Re: How long will star formation endure    

   28 Mar 17 13:56:03   

   1k   

   15603   

   Rich L. to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Does gravity travel at the speed of    

   28 Mar 17 13:53:59   

   2k   

   15602   

   Stefan Ram to Tom Roberts   

   Re: Does gravity travel at the speed of    

   27 Mar 17 07:08:58   

   1k   

   15601   

   James Goetz to All   

   How long will star formation endure befo   

   27 Mar 17 00:42:26   

   1k   

   15600   

   Tom Roberts to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Does gravity travel at the speed of    

   23 Mar 17 00:42:36   

   2k   

   15599   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to Saam"   

   Re: Does gravity travel at the speed of    

   18 Mar 17 18:34:56   

   2k   

   15598   

   Tom Roberts to Richard D. Saam   

   Re: Does gravity travel at the speed of    

   18 Mar 17 09:23:46   

   3k   

   15597   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Roland Franzius   

   Re: Is the "uncertainty principle" a law   

   14 Mar 17 12:20:17   

   1k   

   15596   

   Jos Bergervoet to Roland Franzius   

   Re: Is the "uncertainty principle" a law   

   14 Mar 17 12:19:47   

   1k   

   15595   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: Is the "uncertainty principle" a law   

   13 Mar 17 00:42:01   

   3k   

   15594   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: gravity   

   11 Mar 17 15:01:52   

   5k   

   15593   

   edprochak@gmail.com to pora...@gmail.com   

   Re: gravity   

   10 Mar 17 21:24:55   

   2k   

   15592   

   poraty350@gmail.com to pora...@gmail.com   

   Re: gravity   

   09 Mar 17 13:04:31   

   2k   

   15591   

   John Heath to Rich L.   

   Re: How to measure a Lorentz contraction   

   09 Mar 17 13:03:33   

   7k   

   15590   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: How to measure a Lorentz contraction   

   09 Mar 17 10:39:07   

   7k   

   15589   

   John Heath to Roland Franzius   

   Re: How to measure a Lorentz contraction   

   08 Mar 17 08:09:19   

   6k   

   15588   

   Jos Bergervoet to Rich L.   

   Re: How to measure a Lorentz contraction   

   07 Mar 17 05:48:36   

   1k   

   15587   

   John Heath to Roland Franzius   

   Re: How to measure a Lorentz contraction   

   05 Mar 17 19:44:33   

   6k   

   15586   

   Rich L. to All   

   Re: How to measure a Lorentz contraction   

   05 Mar 17 17:49:02   

   1k   

   15585   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: How to measure a Lorentz contraction   

   05 Mar 17 02:55:53   

   4k   

   15584   

   Lawrence Crowell to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Is the "uncertainty principle" a law   

   05 Mar 17 02:52:55   

   1k   

   15583   

   Rich L. to John Heath   

   Re: How to measure a Lorentz contraction   

   04 Mar 17 07:25:12   

   4k   

   15582   

   Rich L. to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem   

   04 Mar 17 07:25:12   

   4,512b   

   15581   

   John Heath to All   

   Re: How to measure a Lorentz contraction   

   03 Mar 17 09:04:52   

   4,512b   

   15580   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: Does all Hawking radiation require a   

   02 Mar 17 18:24:29   

   7k   

   15579   

   Jos Bergervoet to John Heath   

   Re: How to measure a Lorentz contraction   

   02 Mar 17 18:24:29   

   2k   

   15578   

   rockbrentwood@gmail.com to stargene   

   Re: Does all Hawking radiation require a   

   01 Mar 17 21:40:05   

   6k   

   15577   

   John Heath to All   

   How to measure a Lorentz contraction vol   

   28 Feb 17 08:02:29   

   3k   

   15576   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem   

   28 Feb 17 08:02:29   

   2k   

   15575   

   SEKI to Ned Latham   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   26 Feb 17 22:32:05   

   2,530b   

   15574   

   Ned Latham to SEKI   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   25 Feb 17 23:50:11   

   1k   

   15573   

   Nicolaas Vroom to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem   

   25 Feb 17 23:47:55   

   1k   

   15572   

   Steven Carlip to stargene   

   Re: Does all Hawking radiation require a   

   25 Feb 17 16:36:41   

   1k   

   15571   

   Jos Bergervoet to toadastronomer@gmail.com   

   Re: Does all Hawking radiation require a   

   25 Feb 17 13:46:58   

   2k   

   15570   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   Re: Does all Hawking radiation require a   

   25 Feb 17 07:53:14   

   1k   

   15569   

   SEKI to Ned Latham   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   23 Feb 17 19:59:24   

   1k   

   15568   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to stargene   

   Re: Does all Hawking radiation require a   

   22 Feb 17 16:05:59   

   2k   

   15567   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to All   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem   

   22 Feb 17 15:32:05   

   2k   

   15566   

   Ned Latham to Rich L.   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   22 Feb 17 15:14:08   

   3k   

   15565   

   SEKI to Rich L.   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   22 Feb 17 15:13:39   

   1k   

   15564   

   stargene to All   

   Does all Hawking radiation require an ev   

   22 Feb 17 15:08:04   

   2k   

   15563   

   Douglas Eagleson to matmzc%ho...@gtempaccount.com   

   Re: Photon spin   

   22 Feb 17 15:06:11   

   1k   

   15562   

   Rich L. to Ned Latham   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   21 Feb 17 16:09:21   

   2k   

   15561   

   Ned Latham to SEKI   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   21 Feb 17 08:24:00   

   1,618b   

   15560   

   John Heath to matmzc%ho...@gtempaccount.com   

   Re: Photon spin   

   21 Feb 17 08:24:00   

   1k   

   15559   

   John Heath to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Centripetal force in Special Relativ   

   21 Feb 17 08:23:59   

   5k   

   15558   

   matmzc%hofstra.edu@gtempaccount.com to All   

   Photon spin   

   18 Feb 17 15:32:19   

   4,932b   

   15557   

   Jos Bergervoet to John Heath   

   Re: Centripetal force in Special Relativ   

   15 Feb 17 08:44:35   

   4k   

   15556   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to Gerry Quinn   

   Re: If I were in a black hole the size o   

   14 Feb 17 21:20:47   

   4k   

   15555   

   Gerry Quinn to All   

   Re: If I were in a black hole the size o   

   14 Feb 17 16:13:53   

   2k   

   15554   

   hooch21@gmail.com to All   

   Can we use the units of Planks Constant    

   14 Feb 17 16:13:53   

   1k   

   15553   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to John Heath   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem   

   13 Feb 17 21:28:48   

   2k   

   15552   

   John Heath to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Centripetal force in Special Relativ   

   12 Feb 17 16:27:06   

   6k   

   15551   

   John Heath to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem (   

   12 Feb 17 16:26:36   

   5,824b   

   15550   

   John Heath to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem (   

   12 Feb 17 16:26:36   

   7k   

   15549   

   SEKI to Rich L.   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   09 Feb 17 12:22:16   

   2k   

   15548   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem   

   08 Feb 17 13:32:23   

   5k   

   15547   

   Rich L. to SEKI   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   08 Feb 17 10:52:40   

   2k   

   15546   

   poraty350@gmail.com to fil...@gmail.com   

   Re: gravity   

   08 Feb 17 10:51:59   

   2k   

   15545   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to lawrence...@jeffersonchristianacade   

   Re: If I were in a black hole the size o   

   06 Feb 17 01:00:00   

   4k   

   15544   

   Nicolaas Vroom to SEKI   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   06 Feb 17 00:58:05   

   1k   

   15543   

   Jos Bergervoet to ben6993@hotmail.com   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem   

   06 Feb 17 00:57:42   

   3k   

   15542   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to ben...@hotmail.com   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem   

   04 Feb 17 11:43:00   

   2k   

   15541   

   ben6993@hotmail.com to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Two questions about Bell's theorem   

   03 Feb 17 17:24:39   

   2,491b   

   15540   

   lawrence.crowell@jeffersonchristian to toadast...@gmail.com   

   Re: If I were in a black hole the size o   

   03 Feb 17 17:24:11   

   1k   

   15539   

   SEKI to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   03 Feb 17 17:23:36   

   2k   

   15538   

   Ned Latham to ewugkg   

   Re: Light needs a surface   

   29 Jan 17 07:51:54   

   1,683b   

   15537   

   Jos Bergervoet to Nicolaas Vroom   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   27 Jan 17 13:15:18   

   5k   

   15536   

   Ned Latham to All   

   Re: Light needs a surface   

   27 Jan 17 13:14:24   

   4,741b   

   15535   

   Larisa Kull to Gary Harnagel   

   Re: Light needs a surface   

   27 Jan 17 13:14:01   

   4,741b   

   15534   

   Nicolaas Vroom to Rich L.   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   27 Jan 17 10:35:28   

   3k   

   15533   

   edprochak@gmail.com to ewu...@gmail.com   

   Re: Light needs a surface   

   26 Jan 17 14:53:42   

   1k   

   15532   

   ewugkg@gmail.com to All   

   Light needs a surface   

   24 Jan 17 21:14:13   

   1,051b   

   15531   

   James Goetz to All   

   Does the Copenhagen interpretation rejec   

   21 Jan 17 20:45:16   

   1,051b   

   15530   

   Jos Bergervoet to Roland Franzius   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   17 Jan 17 21:23:11   

   7k   

   15529   

   filmart@gmail.com to Nagaraju Palagani   

   Re: gravity   

   16 Jan 17 23:03:42   

   1k   

   15528   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to toadast...@gmail.com   

   Re: If I were in a black hole the size o   

   16 Jan 17 16:43:52   

   1k   

   15527   

   millsscientific@gmail.com to Nagaraju Palagani   

   Re: gravity   

   15 Jan 17 18:10:32   

   1k   

   15526   

   SEKI to All   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   11 Jan 17 06:34:05   

   1,225b   

   15525   

   Nagaraju Palagani to All   

   gravity   

   10 Jan 17 20:46:10   

   1,225b   

   15524   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   Re: If I were in a black hole the size o   

   10 Jan 17 20:29:37   

   2k   

   15523   

   tommi.hoynalanmaa@gmail.com to All   

   DFT computations of single electron syst   

   10 Jan 17 21:32:22   

   1,786b   

   15522   

   Roland Franzius to All   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   10 Jan 17 21:31:52   

   7k   

   15521   

   Rich L. to Jos Bergervoet   

   Re: Why only one? (Bohm's particle)   

   09 Jan 17 22:21:38   

   6,779b   

   15520   

   Phillip Helbig (undress to reply to toadastronomer@gmail.com   

   Re: If I were in a black hole the size o   

   09 Jan 17 06:59:44   

   6,779b   

   15519   

   toadastronomer@gmail.com to All   

   If I were in a black hole the size of th   

   08 Jan 17 22:14:07   

   6,779b   

   15518   

   Jos Bergervoet to All   

   Why only one? (Bohm's particle)   

   08 Jan 17 22:14:07   

   2k   

   15517   

   Jos Bergervoet to Roland Franzius   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   08 Jan 17 11:07:27   

   7k   

   15516   

   Jos Bergervoet to SEKI   

   Re: Can We Believe in Modern Quantum The   

   08 Jan 17 10:27:58   

   4k   


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca