On Monday, January 9, 2017 at 1:59:46 AM UTC-5, Phillip Helbig (undress to   
   reply) wrote:   
   > In article <85fba950-76d1-4b16-b774-4fd8f1b953ee@googlegroups.com>,   
   > toadastronomer@gmail.com writes:=20   
   >   
   > > If I were in a black hole the size of the observable   
   > > universe and it was not expanding but evaporating,   
   >   
   > It would be evaporating VERY slowly.   
   >   
   > > would my acceleration towards a singularity be easily   
   > > distinguishable from my being in an expanding space   
   > > filled homogeneously and isotropically with all this   
   > > stuff we see?   
   >   
   > Yes.  Inside a black hole, you are not at the singularity if you can=20   
   > still observe anything, hence you cannot observe isotropy, whereas you=20   
   > can in an expanding isotropic space.   
   >   
      
   Yes.  I am NOT at the singularity; I'm observing and all   
   is well.  I'm currently working on the basis that I may   
   be as far from the singularity in my future as I am from   
   the singularity in my past.  I believe I'm accelerating   
   into the future, but no instruments (that I can afford)   
   point in that direction.   
      
   My telescopes only point into the past; they indicate that   
   there is a singularity there, at a distance of order   
   fourteen Glyr.  I see no significant inhomogeneity or   
   anisotropy at the largest observable scales, so the presence   
   of that past singularity does not appear to preclude the   
   validity of the cosmological principle in this place.   
      
   Why should my future singularity disrupt this symmetry?   
      
      
   > > If there were a "firewall" at the inner horizon, would   
   > > it look like the CMB?   
   >   
   > No.   
   >   
   > Keep in mind that there is no consensus on whether firewalls even exist.   
      
   ok.  No firewall; but if there is, it would not look like   
   the CMB.   
      
   Cheers, mark   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)