Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,528 of 17,516    |
|    toadastronomer@gmail.com to toadast...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: If I were in a black hole the size o    |
|    16 Jan 17 16:43:52    |
      On Sunday, January 8, 2017 at 5:14:09 PM UTC-5, toadast...@gmail.com wrote:       > 170108       [redundant text snipped]       . . .                     170115              In attempt to clarify, not belabor a point that might       just be keeping up with wrong;              a certain need to complete some all-subsuming symmetry       appears, which prompts a sighting of the future as a       dark sector we know to be there. Each of us would       nominally have a personal light-cone wobbling into this       void of interactions-to-be, like the torch of a climber       setting out from camp V in the night, on a bid for a       mountain summit, somewhere.              A singularity in the most distant future would seem a       logical necessity if this place is VERY slowly       accelerating in its evaporation, one day to grow hot       and tiny and dense and, at a glance, a mirror image of       what is already described in the past. A big bang!              Naively, I believe it would be very difficult to clearly       distinguish as an observer, whether I am in an expanding       universe, or accelerating into the future within an       evaporating black hole; a space-time conceivably of order       10^29 times greater in size than what we can see, in the       past.              Cheers,       mj horn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca