From: nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz   
      
   SEKI wrote:   
      
   ----snip----   
      
   > Considering single particle (quantum) interference in a double slit   
      
   The result *looks like* the result of wave interference. Given our   
   certain knowledge that not all is as it seems, concluding that the   
   pattern IS a wave interference pattern is invalid.   
      
   Given that large particle versions of the experiment also produce the   
   same patter, that conclusion is not merely invalid, it is incorrect.   
      
   You should discard it.   
      
   > experiment, we can't deny the fact that a quantum is more of a wave   
   > than anything.   
      
   It is not known as a fact. It is a postulate. And based as it is on   
   an invalid and incorrect conclusion, it is worthless.   
      
   ----snip----   
      
   Ned   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)