From: seki.hajime01@gmail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, February 22, 2017 at 1:09:23 AM UTC+9, Rich L. wrote:   
   > I think this whole debate is missing that the wave and particle nature   
   > apply to two different aspects of propagation.  Emission and absorbtion   
   > ALWAYS occures in discrete lumps, like a particle.  However the way the   
   > "particle" gets from the emission event to the absorption event is   
   > distinctly wave-like.  Effects like diffraction proves this latter   
   > point.  There is no conflict if you recognize these two separate aspects   
   > of propagation.   
      
   I consider that the problem you stated above is to be basically   
   resolved by the model I presented in my 3rd posting on this topic.   
      
   In your posting following that of mine, you seem to have commented   
   based on a misconception.   
      
      
   Please note that, in my 3rd posting,   
   "a+b -> c(+d+=E2=80=A6)" should be changed to   
      
   [[Mod. note -- This post arrived in the moderation system with a garbled   
   non-ASCII character in the line above.  Alas, I have no idea what the   
   "=E2=80=A6" in that line above was supposed to be.  If you limit your   
   submissions to 7-bit ASCII, they're much more likely to arrive intact   
   and non-garbled.   
   -- jt]]   
      
   "a+b -> c (+d+...)".   
      
   Thank you.   
      
   SEKI   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)