Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,568 of 17,516    |
|    toadastronomer@gmail.com to stargene    |
|    Re: Does all Hawking radiation require a    |
|    22 Feb 17 16:05:59    |
      On Wednesday, February 22, 2017 at 3:08:07 PM UTC-5, stargene wrote:       > I need some help.       > In reviewing the Hawking radiation process on several websites, a       > naive question occurred to me. I imagine the answer is no, but I       > must ask anyway:       >       > I imagine a huge collapsing mass -- say a neutron star, reaching its       > maximum possible mass, passing its tipping point, and on its way,       > with a fraction of a second, to becoming a black hole. Let's pretend       > it has no spin.       >       > During this tiny interval of time, I can imagine its surface/boundary       > approaching its final surface, defined by its Schwarzschild radius       > r_s. And its gravitational field potential, at some r > r_s, attaining ultra       > relativistic values -- say - .9999999999 c^2. Ie: No event horizon has       > yet been formed, and r is roughly ~10^-7 m outward from the inevitable       > r_s.       >       > This immense grav'l field, at r, should display a strong Unruh effect,       > in an accelerating frame, -- I assume with its own spectrum of virtual       > particles.       >       > My naive question then is: Could one member of such a virtual pair       > then still become relatively isolated from its partner, if it momentarily       > travels toward M, feeling a much higher potential, while its partner       > moves slightly outward from M, into a lower potential.       >       > Could the local field potential differences, in the neighborhood of r,       > then mediate a non-zero chance of the latter member escaping and       > becoming real at infinity?       >       > Ie: A sort of proto-Hawking radiation?       >       > Or does any and all chance of some of the Unruh field of particles       > becoming real require the prior existence of the actual even horizon?       >       > Thanks,       > Gene              Hi gene -              Sabine Hossenfelder's blog always a good source for top-flight help       on such matters. This post from 2015 should provide some insight(s):              http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2015/12/hawking-radiation-is-no       -produced-at.html              cheers,       mark jonathan horn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca