Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.physics.research    |    Current physics research. (Moderated)    |    17,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,570 of 17,516    |
|    toadastronomer@gmail.com to All    |
|    Re: Does all Hawking radiation require a    |
|    25 Feb 17 07:53:14    |
      Gene -              Just a quick follow-up;       Naively I would imagine that in advance of the formation of the       event horizon at r_s, escape velocity v_e < c, so separation and       escape would be in no small part a function of the relative       momenta of the particle pair at the time of creation. Given the       proximity to this surface, as you specify it, the escaping particle       would need to be endowed with a quite substantial momentum       and be oriented on an appropriately outward pointing trajectory       in order to get free, while the partner (presumably slightly closer       to the surface and oriented differently) would likely get trapped.              I don't see any obvious way for there to be sufficient separation       of the pair to allow for escape/in-fall, except, as suggested in SH's       blog post, that the pair creation be located at some significant       distance from the collapsing mass. I don't know what rule(s) would       allow a (massive) particle to be spontaneously created with sufficient       velocity to do the trick.              Cheers,       mark              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca